Animals were friends or foes of humanity at different stages of the human history. In modern times, experiments upon animals have been a breeding ground for spirited debate. Some animal rights activists argue that we should ban animal experiments altogether because subjecting animals to experimentation is unwarranted on moral grounds, whereas some other people contend that the advancement of science necessitates animal testing. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view.
Granted, mounting empirical evidence suggests that many animal experiments are performed callously without any heed to the discomfort or pain that laboratory mammals endure. For one thing, improper confinement of test animals such as locking them up in cramped cages is inhumane; and this, in turn, can severely disrupt natural biological functions of the test animal. For another, the effects of vaccination or vivisection conducted on live mammals can be chilling. In extreme cases, they constitute sheer torture of animals.
Nevertheless, from a more pragmatic standpoint, evidence abounds that animal subjects are still an indispensable part of scientific research at this phase of human development. In the first place, drug experimentation on live mammals is, indisputably, far more effectual than experimentation on bacteria or on other lower species in determining drug safety. Medical history informs that drugs that can potentially exert grave side effects on homo sapiens must be tested by pharmaceutical companies on live mammals first to ascertain their toxicity. In the second place, in the realm of space research, live animals are still practical alternatives on a flight not considered to be sufficiently safe for human astronauts. And I would be hard-pressed to imagine the scenario that human lives should be put at stake when the objective of a space mission is merely to identify living creatures reaction to outer space experience. Lastly, lab research about the behavioral tendencies of chimpanzees, gorillas or other members of the primate group is also a worthy endeavor, in light of the fact that it generates outcomes consistently advancing anthropological and genetic sciences.
To conclude, I concede that experiments upon animals may induce suffering to the test animals. However, it is generally arguable that there are no practical alternatives to this methodology at the current stage of scientific development. On balance , I am convinced that what we should do is to allow animals testing to be continued but at the same time use techniques such as analgesic, anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs to minimize the pain of the test animal.
粉丝打造“乔治王子”仿真娃娃
脸书上获赞10万的大眼宝宝:心都萌化了!
外媒揭秘:新iPhone将会有哪些改变?
中国互联网巨擘加紧争夺O2O市场
2015上半年网络流行语双语版出炉啦!
外媒:智能手机屏幕调暗真能省电吗?
关于人类头发的四大惊人事实
中国祭出的托市新招未能奏效
再买就剁手 男性冲动购物比女性花费多
大众工厂机器人杀人是工业事故
《纽约时报》详解:希腊经济危机始末
中美高科技公司角逐印度市场
罗琳爆料 弗农姨夫为啥讨厌哈利波特
德国文化 德国红灯亮了28年
比伯新爱好:中式拔火罐
就业难?淘宝“卖”毕业生,1000元可拍!
准新娘真会玩:厕纸婚纱风潮来袭
"做自己喜欢的事情"真的是一个好的建议吗?
白金汉宫翻修耗资1.5亿英镑,英女王或搬家
债务危机中的希腊旅游攻略
美国最高院也举起彩虹旗
《花千骨》英文片花逆袭:玛丽苏台词合集
史上最强汽车防盗法 你绝对想不到
漂亮女人最好命?颜值能干扰公平意识
印巴将加入“上合组织”
教育部严禁“有偿补课”
Uber继续在印度大举扩张
来一瓶“希腊退欧”酒可好?
韩国的创意经济
中美减排计划令人期待全球协议
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |