Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful . However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions .
高中英语语法 一致现象不可忽视
高中三年级英语单词教案unit11
高三英语教案 不可缺少的副词
高中三年级英语单词教案unit08
高三英语教案 不可错位的形容词排序
高中三年级英语单词教案unit03
高三英语教案 结构分析亦奏效
高三英语教案 区别微妙的情态动词
高中三年级英语单词教案unit09
高中三年级英语单词教案unit16
高三英语教案 错综复杂的从属连词
高三英语教案 多变的省略句
高中三年级英语单词教案unit13
高三英语教案 有章可循的主旨大意题
高中三年级英语单词教案unit02
高中英语语法 虚拟语气
高中三年级英语单词教案unit07
高三英语教案 语篇情景考虑要周全
高中三年级英语单词教案unit14
高中三年级英语单词教案unit15
高中英语语法句子倒装重在看其结构
高中三年级英语单词教案unit10
高中三年级英语单词教案unit05
高三英语教案 独立主格结构
高三英语教案 比较等级的比较对象及范围
高三英语教案 冠词的非前位用法
高三英语教案 语境下的时态须慎重
高中英语书面表达 句子衔接加连词
高中三年级英语单词教案unit06
高中三年级英语单词教案unit12
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |