Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful . However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions .
你信么? 人这辈子亲密朋友只有5个!
减肥后体重反弹 那不是你的错
创业前先想明白这七个问题吧
为什么不能把钱包放在后口袋
孩子会长多高? 简单公式帮你预测
中国最高法院公开审理乔丹商标争议行政纠纷案
儿科医生:为了孩子的语言发展 请父母远离手机!
美国小店推环保披萨:可以连盒一起吃
体坛英语资讯:Serbias head coach: Good start but a long way ahead
体坛英语资讯:Atletico top as Barca and Reals poor starts continue
宜家耐克:这些大牌的英文名连老外都会读错
郑州“女性专用公交”引争议
6种素养让你的老板“坐稳江山”
体坛英语资讯:Flamengo beat Palmeiras to remain top of Brazils Serie A
婚外情泛滥 私人侦探生意忙!
不吃早餐比连吃两顿早餐更易增重!
关于睡眠的10大误解和迷思
应届毕业生应该如何追求幸福
惹毛老板的5个方法,you can you up!
“标签自拍”运动揭露快时尚内幕
迪拜乞丐富得流油 月入47万元人民币!
调查:北京房租负担排名全球第一
24条都中?说明你20岁的身体里住了个老灵魂!
一个人过生日是什么感觉
苹果新专利:再不怕英文自动修正闹笑话了
“为食物垃圾买单” 韩国在行动
体坛英语资讯:Quintana in red as 20-year-old Pogacar wins epic 9th stage of Vuelta
印度3D斑马线提醒减速慢行
苹果发布13年来最差季报iphone销量首次下跌
特朗普还是希拉里 数据告诉你
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |