Many countries have spent vast sum of money on armament for the sake of self defense. Some people think they should spend on helping the poverty and other disadvantages rather than on weapons. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many years has gone by since World War II, we now live in a relatively peaceful environment and strive to develop a stronger economy. By contrast, developed and developing countries are spending a staggering amount of money on national defense. While such policy might appears to be an awful waste to some countries, particularly developing ones like China and India, it has deeper reasons for doing so.
It is wise to strengthen the national defense because a strong army entails a number of benefits for a nation. If not for other reason, peace and security top all other objectives for a country in all its endeavors. We have seen cases in which super powers took control or even invaded other sovereignties for economic or military interests. From history, China also learned its lesson in a very bitter way when its land was raged and trampled by foreign troops. So China has stepped up spending and efforts in national defense in order not to repeat such tragedy.
Money put in military research and development could also boost many hi-tech technologies. A good example could be found in the application of nuclear energy technology. Originally designed for war purposes, nuclear energy now provides a high percentage source of power in many countries, contributing to the preservation of natural resources such as coal and oil. Nuclear energy has benefits because it is both cost-effective and environmental friendly.
Economic growth is among other benefits spurred by military development. A wide range of military products is spawn from national defense investment. Demand for uniform, weapon, food and other commodities creates a huge market for the local and international businesses, which in turn increase demand for the labor market. It has been estimated that if the military spending is cut by 20 percent, millions of workers would lose their jobs and the country would suffer economically as well.
In conclusion, spending in national defense is critical in the peace keeping for a country and it also brings numerous benefits such as encouraging technology development and supporting economic growth.
拉美国家的城市交通:还是骑车吧
各国创意火锅大比拼
历史中东:新月沃土,富饶不再
普京式"平衡",玩转俄罗斯
感受西班牙奔牛节——要狂欢不要命的节日
美国文化习俗精粹 第2期:Customer Service 美式顾客服务
美国文化习俗精粹 第3期:Driving 美国人的开车习惯
美国文化习俗精粹 第10期:Friendship 美式友谊
轻松绕开英语文化陷阱
海国百态:非洲人民的钱不好赚
和科学教说拜拜:那些脱离该教会的明星们
一位备受人争议的美国画家,两场品鉴其作品的英国画展
美国文化习俗精粹 第13期:山姆大叔到底是谁?
美国文化习俗精粹 第9期:Love of American Style美式爱情
圣诞节平安夜 Christmas Eve
节日≠假日:你要在圣诞节那天工作吗?
中西方文化一瞥:和英国人交流需步步惊心”
岛国闲事:安倍劫老济少
美国文化习俗精粹 第1期:Hospitality美式待客之道
美国文化习俗精粹 第7期:Pets 美国宠物
研究验证:英国人沉稳保守 美国人乐观浪漫
美国人大爱而其他世界不感冒的12件事
美国文化习俗精粹 第4期:Music 美国人的音乐爱好
当"中华福爷爷"遇上"圣诞老人"
美国文化习俗精粹 第14期:美国的州名从何而来
致命鸡尾酒: 泰国的表里不一
叙利亚之旅: 梦般繁华,存于梦中,战火既起,昨日已逝
为什么西方认为13不吉利
缤纷曼哈顿: 纽约之美 不在规划
传奇摇滚乐队之最 Top Ten Most Amazing Rock Bands of All Time
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |