Many countries have spent vast sum of money on armament for the sake of self defense. Some people think they should spend on helping the poverty and other disadvantages rather than on weapons. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many years has gone by since World War II, we now live in a relatively peaceful environment and strive to develop a stronger economy. By contrast, developed and developing countries are spending a staggering amount of money on national defense. While such policy might appears to be an awful waste to some countries, particularly developing ones like China and India, it has deeper reasons for doing so.
It is wise to strengthen the national defense because a strong army entails a number of benefits for a nation. If not for other reason, peace and security top all other objectives for a country in all its endeavors. We have seen cases in which super powers took control or even invaded other sovereignties for economic or military interests. From history, China also learned its lesson in a very bitter way when its land was raged and trampled by foreign troops. So China has stepped up spending and efforts in national defense in order not to repeat such tragedy.
Money put in military research and development could also boost many hi-tech technologies. A good example could be found in the application of nuclear energy technology. Originally designed for war purposes, nuclear energy now provides a high percentage source of power in many countries, contributing to the preservation of natural resources such as coal and oil. Nuclear energy has benefits because it is both cost-effective and environmental friendly.
Economic growth is among other benefits spurred by military development. A wide range of military products is spawn from national defense investment. Demand for uniform, weapon, food and other commodities creates a huge market for the local and international businesses, which in turn increase demand for the labor market. It has been estimated that if the military spending is cut by 20 percent, millions of workers would lose their jobs and the country would suffer economically as well.
In conclusion, spending in national defense is critical in the peace keeping for a country and it also brings numerous benefits such as encouraging technology development and supporting economic growth.
国际英语资讯:Lebanese police officer killed, 142 injured in anti-govt protests after Beiruts deadly b
国际英语资讯:17 confirmed dead in plane crash-landing in south India
快乐的节日——六一儿童节
矫枉过正?美国“抵制文化”盛行,名人怕说错话纷纷噤声
快乐的节日
洛杉矶对付大型聚会有新招:断水断电
国内英语资讯:China launches TV program for CPCs 100th founding anniversary
国际英语资讯:U.S. political suppression of non-American firms doomed to boomerang: China
国内英语资讯:Spotlight: Various sectors in Hong Kong condemn so-called U.S. sanctions
我的好朋友
国内英语资讯:Poverty-alleviation relocation basically completed in China
矫枉过正?美国“抵制文化”盛行,名人怕说错话纷纷噤声
快乐的一天
我喜欢的小英雄
我的朋友宋淑琦
国内英语资讯:Interview: China confident of meeting 2020 fiscal targets
国内英语资讯:DPP criticized over obstructing mainland students return to Taiwan for study
国际英语资讯:Palestine says takes issue of Israeli field executions against Palestinians to ICC
我学包饺子
国际英语资讯:Germany introduces mandatory COVID-19 tests for travelers from high-risk areas
国际英语资讯:France reports biggest daily spike of coronavirus cases since end of April
国内英语资讯:China committed to protecting marine resources: spokesperson
国内英语资讯:China urges U.S. to stop arms sales to Taiwan
游记
可爱的蚕宝宝
国内英语资讯:Draft amendments to better adapt Chinas top legislature to supervisory reform
国际英语资讯:ASEAN foreign ministers release statement on blocs 53rd anniversary
国际英语资讯:Death toll rises to 154 in Beirut explosions
The time of day? 钟表时刻
国际英语资讯:Lebanons Tripoli port ready to temporarily replace Port of Beirut after deadly blasts
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |