Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
雅思阅读考试复习指南(3)
雅思阅读文章(英式小村庄)解析及答案
雅思阅读中的8个常见关系词
雅思阅读高频词汇-a
雅思考试的雅思阅读五大题型解析及趋势
雅思阅读文章(金星凌日)解析及答案
雅思阅读考试复习指南(2)
实例讲解雅思阅读单选题答题技巧
量体裁衣 定制雅思阅读写作备考方案
雅思阅读观点题解析方法指导
雅思阅读练习:药物研究失败的因素
雅思阅读考试有哪些注意事项?
应对雅思阅读文章中的陌生词汇的方法
剖析雅思阅读文章结构:自然科学篇
雅思阅读各题型的解题技巧:其他题型
雅思阅读的题型要求和解题步骤
雅思阅读文章(竹子)解析及答案
雅思阅读考试的四个做题步骤
雅思阅读材料:奥巴马给女儿的信
盘点雅思阅读题目的10个特点
备考指导:雅思阅读实用技巧
了解雅思阅读中的定位词
雅思阅读考试复习指南(1)
雅思阅读文章(苏联劳动时间的变化)解析及答案
雅思阅读各题型的解题技巧:简答题
雅思阅读对雅思写作思路的借鉴意义
雅思阅读题型介绍及做题顺序
雅思阅读12字真言:攻心为上 战略为辅 逐个击破
雅思阅读实战训练模拟试题(二)
雅思阅读实用临场技巧
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |