Should criminals be sent to a jail or let them do something else as punishment instead of sending into a jail? Why and give your reasons.
There has long been controversy concerning the objectives of the justice system. Sending criminals to a prison seems to be a justified punishment for damages inflicted to victims or society. But currently an increasing number of people goes with the option that criminals should be given appropriate amount of community services as a substitute of correction measures.
Traditionally courts sentence law violators to serve a period of time in a prison or, under some circumstances, a correction institution if the offenders are minors or the charges are not serious. Criminals, after serving their time, are discharged back to the street. Ironically many of them end up becoming victims of the law itself. For example, a forty years old man served 10 years in prison for intentional injury. Released from jail, he found himself having great trouble in making a living because he lacked new skills and knowledge for work. No place wanted him for fear of possible future wrongdoings because of his criminal record. In many cases, ex-criminals become outcasts of community and are forced to commit other crimes for revenge or other reasons.
On the contrary, criminals could be changed into contributing members of the society again if given a second chance. In such cases, they perform public services under supervision making a meager but honest living. This not only cuts the expenses of keeping them in jails such as food, cloth, and numerous other costs, but also warns would-be law offenders the consequences for illegal actions. This is particularly effective for minor criminals who stand a greater chance of achieving the corrective aims.
But it is no easy job to draw a fine line between those who should be given a lighter punishment and those who should be more heavily published due the nature of law under complex circumstances. Nevertheless, we should encourage more effective ways of law enforcement to protect law-abiding citizens and, at the same time, deter and punish violators at any level so that criminals would not take advantage of lighter punishments.
To sum up, either sending criminals to a prison or giving them community work as another form of punishment has merits for different reasons. But we need to be clear of the goals of law and choose more effective ways of law enforcement.
儿童节遇端午 民俗专家讲述端午带娃去哪
父母为孩子“跑官”揭示家庭教育四大弊病
不让宝宝当熊孩子 家长画“漫画家规”
2014北京幼升小面试题:身体素质
幼升小孩子需要注意哪些安全事项?
孩子"幼升小" 家长错误观念大盘点
幼小衔接必读:培养孩子良好学习和生活习惯
家长必读:幸福与否问问孩子
幼小衔接必读:激发孩子对小学的向往之情
2014如何做好幼小衔接?
幼儿园学生被要求写诗写日记 家长抱怨作业难
家长该如何准备幼小衔接
北京市小学教育资源严重短缺 适龄儿童预估不足
北京3-6岁儿童免费“涂氟”
幼小衔接新节奏:提前学 孩子才能跟得上
习惯培养:上小学的孩子午睡习惯要改掉
如何为幼升小孩子创设良好的学习与生活环境?
如何走出盲目幼升小择校“怪圈”?
如何创造条件来培养孩子的自信心
如何帮助孩子做好幼升小前的习惯养成
各类小学相比较 家长们如何择校
2014北京幼升小面试题:学习自立
普通家庭幼升小择校必看的三个问题
四大方法教会孩子第二语言
怎样才是正确的幼小衔接?
2014北京幼升小面试试题精选
小学和幼儿园有哪些不同?
幼儿园等级评定利弊何在?
四成孩子幼小衔接不顺利 能力培养更主要
2014年幼升小海淀区五证暂住证时间调整
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |