WASHINGTON, July 13 -- Seventeen U.S. states and the District of Columbia sued the administration of President Donald Trump on Monday to reject the federal government's recent rule stripping foreign students of their visas if the institution they are enrolled in only offers online teaching this fall due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Led by the Massachusetts attorney general's office, the lawsuit came exactly one week after the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) released guidelines vowing to invalidate foreign students' F-1 and M-1 visas if the educational institution they are enrolled in switches to online-only courses, possibly depriving them of their legal status of stay in the United States.
"The Trump Administration didn't even attempt to explain the basis for this senseless rule, which forces schools to choose between keeping their international students enrolled and protecting the health and safety of their campuses," Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey said in a statement.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Boston, sought an injunction to stop the entire rule from going into effect, accusing the federal government of engaging in a "cruel, abrupt, and unlawful action to expel international students amidst the pandemic that has wrought death and disruption across the United States."
Joining Healey in the lawsuit are the attorneys general from Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.
The lawsuit alleged that the administration's "actions are arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion because they reverse previous guidance without explanation, input, or rationale," adding that the new guidelines violated "the Administrative Procedure Act - and fail to consider the need to protect public health and safety amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic."
"The lawsuit includes a request for immediate preliminary relief blocking the rule from going into effect while the case is litigated, and the attorneys general have requested a hearing as soon as possible," the Massachusetts attorney general's office said in a press release.
Announced on July 6, the ICE's controversial order said that international students who are only offered online courses in the upcoming semester "must depart the country or take other measures, such as transferring to a school with in-person instruction to remain in lawful status."
Those who violate the rules "may face immigration consequences including, but not limited to, the initiation of removal proceedings," the ICE said.
While the U.S. government typically requires international students to take most classes in person, the ICE offered flexibility in March, allowing the students to take online courses throughout the duration of the coronavirus pandemic.
Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology filed a lawsuit, also in the U.S. District Court in Boston, on Wednesday seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to bar the federal government from enforcing its new order.
"(The) ICE's action proceeded without any indication of having considered the health of students, faculty, university staff, or communities ... or the absence of other options for universities to provide their curricula to many of their international students," the lawsuit by the two prestigious universities read.
The U.S. District Court in Boston will hold a hearing on the Harvard and MIT case Tuesday.
In a show of solidarity, 59 colleges, based in 24 states and Washington, D.C., filed an amicus brief in court on Sunday backing Harvard and MIT's legal action. The schools include Georgetown, Princeton, Stanford and Yale, among others.
"A fundamental principle of administrative law is that the government must provide a reasoned explanation for its actions and consider all important aspects of a problem before imposing burdens on regulated parties," the brief stated. "The July 6 Directive fails this basic requirement."
"The emergency persists," the universities said, referring to the coronavirus pandemic, "yet the government's policy has suddenly and drastically changed, throwing (schools') preparations into disarray and causing significant harm and turmoil."
GRE写作中常见的修辞手法
GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例13
GRE写作中文特色词汇翻译
GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例10
GRE写作高分经验谈:怎样给作文列出提纲
新GRE写作技巧详解
GRE数学复习冲刺对策
GRE出国考试写作:GRE作文范例1
GRE作文入门和进阶二
GRE作文入门和进阶二十六
GRE作文入门和进阶八
GRE作文备考资料3
GRE作文备考资料4
GRE英语作文笔记(一)
提升GRE写作的经典句型
GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例6
GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例16
浅析GRE作文雷同现象:培养独立思考能力
GRE写作必看精粹核心句型
名师透析新GRE写作
GRE作文备考资料2
新GRE写作模版总结
Issue写作详解(二)
新GRE写作优秀范文:多媒体教育
GRE英语作文笔记(二)
GRE作文入门和进阶十
GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例5
GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例14
新GRE写作优秀范文:权威问题
GRE出国考试写作:GRE出国考试作文范例2
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |