Unrealistic? Researchers found that the number of very close friends people have is going down, despite Facebook and what popular sitcoms might say
In this age of Facebook and Twitter, we are all supposed to have hundreds of friends.
But in fact most of us have just two people we would consider to be close friends – down from an average of three 25 years ago, a study claims.
Researchers say this is no cause for concern. Instead, they claim that while some of us may be getting ‘more vulnerable’, many are simply becoming more adept at deciding who they can trust to be a close confidant.
The figure contrasts sharply with the race among the young to collect as many ‘friends’ as possible on social networking sites to prove their popularity.
According to Facebook the average user has 130 friends, but many of these are chance acquaintances or people they will never meet in real life.
But according to Matthew Brashears from the University of Cornwell, although this shrinking social network 'makes us potentially more vulnerable, we’re not as socially isolated as scholars had feared'.
For his study, Mr Brashears used data from a nationally representative experiment.
More than 2,000 adults ages 18 and older were surveyed from the nationally representative Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences (TESS) programme.
Mr Brashears found that 'modern discussion networks have decreased in size, which is consistent with other researchers' findings, but that social isolation has not become more prevalent'.
When asked to list the names of people they had discussed 'important matters' with over the previous six months, about 48 percent of participants listed one name, 18 percent listed two, and roughly 29 percent listed more than two names for these close friends.
On average, participants had 2.03 confidantes. And just over four percent of participants didn't list any names.
Female participants and those who were educated were the least likely to report no names on their confidante list.
(Read by Emily Cheng. Emily Cheng is a journalist at the China Daily Website.)
双语资讯
(Agencies)
在这个Facebook和Twitter盛行的时代,按理说我们每人都应该有数百位朋友。
然而有研究称,事实上我们中的大多数人只有两个亲密的朋友,而25年前人均好友数量为3个。
研究人员认为并不需要为此担心。他们指出,尽管我们当中有一部分人可能会变得“更脆弱”,但很多人只是更善于判定自己能够信任的知己密友罢了。
这一数据和年轻人为了证明自己的人气争相在社交网站上加尽可能多的“好友”形成了强烈对比。
Facebook的数据显示,平均每位用户有130名“好友”,但这些“好友”中的许多人都是偶然认识的人,或根本不会在现实生活中遇见的人。
康威尔大学的马修•布莱希尔斯说,尽管缩小的好友圈子“可能会让我们更脆弱,但我们并不像学者们所担心的那样孤立”。
在他的研究中,布莱希尔斯采用了一项有全国代表性的实验的数据。
这一具有全国代表性的“社会科学项目分时实验”调查了2000多名年龄在18岁及以上的成人。
布莱希尔斯发现,“现代人进行实质讨论的圈子缩小了,这和其他研究人员的发现是一致的,但是并没有更多人因此变得孤立。”
当研究人员让参与者列出在过去六个月内和他们一起讨论“重要事情”的人时,约有48%的参与者列出一个名字,18%的人列出两个名字,约有29%的人在密友这一项列出两个以上的名字。
平均来看,参与者拥有2.03个知心好友。只有稍过4%的参与者没有列出任何名字。
女性参与者和那些受过教育的参与者在密友这一项没有列出任何名字的可能性最低。
相关阅读
研究:女性有四个“闺蜜”最理想
研究:找到一位恋人将失去两位好友
研究:社交网站有利真实社交
社交网络现代沟 年轻人好友以千计
社交网站和电邮正威胁英国家庭生活
科学家:社交网站培育出“自恋的一代”
Vocabulary:
adept at: 善于
confidant: 知己;密友
time-sharing: 分时
田纳西州少年因身穿沙基裤 被捕入狱
“我不敢”用英语怎么说?
派对上的“无聊谈话”
中国绿发会向大众提起“环境公益诉讼”
上合组织总理会三大关键词
美国中产阶级崩溃:五成美国人生活贫困或在贫困边缘
奥巴马一家的圣诞之旅“太烧钱”遭批
美麦当劳250人“接力买单”传温暖
淑女都这么说英语!
奥巴马发表反恐全国讲话 誓言摧毁伊斯兰国
全球变暖:地球自转慢了 每天的日子长了
2016年经济工作要点出炉
《唐顿》大小姐生日之际为病逝未婚夫准备葬礼
上海试收“雾霾费”
习近平:深入实施“创新驱动发展战略”
普京奇特的“枪手步态”与克格勃武器训练有关
IMDb选出年度十佳电影:你看了几部?
特朗普:美国政界“新偏执狂”现象的写照
“巴黎协定”终获通过
那些流传甚广的假名人名言
首例“数码囤积狂”确诊 每天花五小时整理照片
“不爽猫”电子蜡像现身杜莎夫人蜡像馆
撒切尔夫人离开唐宁街演讲
害怕外出的“社交恐惧症”
2015年的流行语和它们的英文翻译~
身边老板是否患有“错爱综合症”
现代淑女的26个标准
美语版《唐顿庄园》你看过没?
韩国在华发行“熊猫债券”
世界哪个国家看电视时间最多?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |