SAN FRANCISCO, June 12 -- A three-judge panel of a federal appeals court ruled Monday against reinstalling U.S. President Donald Trump's travel ban.
The motions panel of the U.S. Courts for the 9th Circuit presented its decision in 86 pages of written opinion, stating at the end that "The Government's motion for a stay (of the travel ban) pending appeal is DENIED as moot."
The travel ban, the second of the kind, was blocked on March 15 by U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in response to a suit by the state of Hawaii.
The panel heard on May 15 in Seattle, Washington state, Acting U.S. Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall on behalf of the Trump administration and Neal Katyal, an attorney representing the state of Hawaii, argue about whether the nationwide temporary restraining order (TRO) imposed by Judge Watson should be lifted and the travel ban as part of a presidential executive order reimposed.
"The district court did not abuse its discretion in entering a nationwide preliminary injunction," the judges wrote in their opinion.
The second travel ban, signed by Trump on March 6 as part of his executive order, bars nationals of Libya, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the United States for 90 days; and suspends the entry of all refugees.
It was the second time the 9th Circuit Court heard and ruled against the same president's travel ban.
On Feb. 9, another panel of three judges ruled in San Francisco, Northern California, against reinstating the travel ban signed on Jan. 27 by Trump as part of an executive order.
The president subsequently issued the revised order, taking Iraq off the list of seven Muslim-majority countries.
In initiating the legal challenge against the second travel ban on March 9, Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin noted that the new order, compared with the initial ban, "nothing of substance has changed: there is the same blanket ban on entry from Muslim-majority countries."
On their part, the three judges sitting on the motions panel of the appellate court said "the President's authority is subject to certain statutory and constitutional restraints. We conclude that the President, in issuing the Executive Order, exceeded the scope of the authority delegated to him by Congress."
2014年辽宁本溪中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年黑龙江鸡西中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年辽宁丹东中考英语真题试题答案
2014年辽宁鞍山中考英语真题试题答案
2014年辽宁盘锦中考英语真题试题答案
2014年黑龙江大庆中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年黑龙江牡丹江中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年江苏常州中考英语真题试题答案
2014年黑龙江黑河中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年江苏南通中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年江苏徐州中考英语真题试题答案
2014年江苏南通中考英语真题试题答案
2014年辽宁抚顺中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年黑龙江大庆中考英语真题试题答案
2014年辽宁沈阳中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年吉林中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年黑龙江齐齐哈尔中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年辽宁鞍山中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年辽宁营口中考英语真题试题答案
2014年黑龙江齐齐哈尔中考英语真题试题答案
2014年辽宁大连中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年辽宁锦州中考英语真题试题答案
2014年吉林长春中考英语真题试题答案
2014年辽宁铁岭中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年辽宁大连中考英语真题试题答案
2014年湖北天门中考英语真题试题答案
2014年湖北天门中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年辽宁锦州中考英语真题试题及答案
2014年辽宁抚顺中考英语真题试题答案
2014年黑龙江黑河中考英语真题试题答案
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |