PYONGYANG, Dec. 16 -- A research institute under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) issued a statement Sunday night criticizing the United States for imposing sanctions against DPRK officials.
The statement was issued by the policy research director of the Institute for American Studies of the Foreign Ministry, and released by DPKR's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) without giving the name of the director.
The statement said the top leaders of the DPRK and the United States committed themselves to improving the DPRK-U.S. relations at the historic DPRK-U.S. summit held in Singapore in June, and currently the bilateral relations are advancing along the firm will of the two leaders to follow through their joint statement issued then.
However, it added, over the past six months, the U.S. State Department and the Treasury Department have carried out eight rounds of sanctions against DPRK companies, individuals and ships as well as other third countries through false pretexts.
"Recently, the U.S. is resorting to an anti-DPRK human rights plot in such a way that it carries a deliberate provocation by adding high-ranking government officials of the DPRK" to its unilateral sanctions list, while taking issue with a non-existent "human rights issue," the statement pointed out.
Washington announced on Dec. 10 that it would impose sanctions against three DPRK officials for serious human rights abuses and censorship, and DPRK's statement on Sunday seems to be a semi-official response to the U.S. decision.
"Far from the statements of the (U.S.) president, the State Department is instead bent on bringing DPRK-U.S. relations back to the status of last year which was marked by exchanges of fire. I cannot help but throw doubt on the ulterior motive of the State Department," KCNA quoted the director as saying, adding that the sanctions against the DPRK "would not work."
The director also stressed that if the high-ranking politicians within the U.S. administration wished to "drive us into giving up nuclear weapons by way of increasing anti-DPRK sanctions and pressure," it would be a miscalculation, and "will block the path to denuclearization on the Korean peninsula forever."
雅思写作素材:入乡随俗or多元文化
雅思大作文范文:博物馆的作用(共5篇)
雅思写作范文:小孩子该学习竞争or合作?(二)
雅思写作范文:城乡差距的原因及解决(四)
浅析雅思写作备考中的多样性
20句雅思写作模板中心句
雅思写作范文:电脑替代老师?(十二)
雅思写作范文:小孩子该学习竞争or合作?(四)
雅思大作文范文:电脑VS老师
雅思议论文写作需要避免的6大忌
雅思大作文模板:吃动物残忍吗?
雅思议论文写作真题重现:在家工作的问题
雅思写作范文:nature or nurture?(四)
18条雅思小作文的高分技巧
雅思写作范文:城乡差距的原因及解决(三)
雅思写作范文:小孩子该学习竞争or合作?(五)
雅思写作范文:小孩子该学习竞争or合作?(七)
雅思写作范文:政府是否应该控制网络不良信息?(三)
雅思写作范文:博物馆的作用(四)
雅思大作文范文:城乡差距的原因及解决(共8篇)
雅思写作范文:政府是否应该控制网络不良信息?(二)
7个细节突破雅思写作高分
雅思写作范文:nature or nurture?(十一)
雅思写作范文:学校应提供理论教育or实践教育?(三)
雅思大作文参考:国际旅游带来文化冲突?
雅思写作范文:博物馆的作用(五)
雅思小作文写作的五大误解
突破雅思写作高分瓶颈的三误区
突破雅思写作高分的三大要点
雅思写作范文:电脑代替博物馆?(中英)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |