URUMQI, July 28 -- A group of Chinese experts have criticized the United States for adopting double standards on counterterrorism and deradicalization and using Xinjiang-related issues as a tool to interfere in China's domestic affairs.
The experts, who specialize in studies in the fields of human rights, international relations and anti-terrorism, made the remarks at a seminar held recently in Urumqi, capital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
Wang Yu, an associate researcher with the Institute of Chinese Borderland Studies, said China's anti-terror measures implemented in Xinjiang in recent years have provided a new solution to the global fight against terrorism.
For some time China's Xinjiang has seen frequent incidents of terrorist attacks, but over the past nearly three years, there have been no such incidents in the region, Wang noted.
Gu Liyan, a researcher with the Xinjiang Academy of Social Sciences, accused the United States of using human rights issues to erode public trust in governments of some other countries and create social conflict and unrest there, so as to attain its global hegemony.
"Whatever measures or policies China implements on counterterrorism and deradicalization will never accord with the so-called human rights standards of the U.S.," she said.
Li Wei, a researcher with the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations, said education and training centers were established in Xinjiang in order to prevent trainees from falling victim to terrorism and extremism.
China's measures on deradicalization offer a successful case study to the international community and have won widespread recognition and acclaim, said Li.
Shu Hongshui, an anti-terror expert at Northwest University of Political Science and Law, said the U.S. adoption of double standards on counterterrorism and deradicalization is intended to curb China's development.
The propaganda warfare waged by the United States and some other Western countries against China on Xinjiang-related issues is unable to conceal their strategic anxiety and predicament, Shu said.
2015职称英语理工类考试阅读理解文章及练习Snowflakes:文章
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解练习(5)
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解备考必备复习资料(3)
2015年职称英语理工类考试阅读判断经典练习题(1)
2015年职称英语理工类阅读判断习题及答案(1)
2014年职称英语卫生类考试教材阅读理解文章及练习(15)
2015职称英语理工类考试阅读理解文章及练习Valuing :文章
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解备考必备复习资料(2)
2015职称英语理工类考试阅读理解文章及练习Hacking:文章
网校名师么教授09年职称英语押中题目之理工类A级阅读理解
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解备考必备复习资料(7)
2015职称英语理工类考试阅读理解文章及练习Plant Gas:练习
2015职称英语考试理工类阅读理解练习(2)
2014年职称英语(理工类)阅读理解中英文背诵模板(18)
2015职称英语理工类考试阅读理解文章及练习Plant Gas:文章
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解备考必备复习资料(1)
2014年职称英语考试理工类A完型填空原文
2015年职称英语卫生类B级阅读理解习题练习(4)
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解备考必备复习资料(9)
2015职称英语考试理工类阅读理解练习(5)
2015职称英语理工类考试阅读理解文章及练习Plant Gas:译文
2014年职称英语卫生类考试教材阅读理解文章及练习(14)
2015年职称英语理工类阅读判断习题附答案(1)
2015年职称英语理工类考试阅读判断经典练习题(3)
2015年职称英语考试卫生类阅读理解练习题(6)
2015年职称英语考试卫生类阅读理解练习题(9)
2015职称英语考试理工类阅读理解练习(4)
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解练习(6)
2015职称英语考试理工类阅读理解练习(1)
2015年职称英语卫生类阅读理解练习(2)
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |