BEIJING, July 26 -- In the wake of a series of violent incidents initiated by radical protestors in Hong Kong, some politicians in the United States and Britain did not miss the chance of meddling in China's internal affairs, using their usual front as the champion of freedom and democracy.
What those radical protestors did was a trail of escalating violence. They first stormed and damaged the Legislative Council Complex in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), surrounded the police headquarters, attacked police officers and illegally stored dangerous goods and a large number of offensive weapons, and then on Sunday evening besieged and stormed the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the HKSAR, defacing the national emblem and painting insulting words on the wall.
They trampled on the rule of law in Hong Kong, openly challenged the authority of the central government and crossed the bottom line of the "one country, two systems" principle.
Their shocking acts not only harmed the interest and wellbeing of Hong Kong people but also hurt the feelings of all Chinese including 7 million Hong Kong compatriots.
It is the lawful duty of any government to denounce violence, crack down upon crimes and safeguard the rule of law, which should have given no cause for criticism.
Just as Hong Kong's society called for a curb on violence, and the government and police of the HKSAR took necessary and lawful measures to maintain the social order, some U.S. and British politicians took turns to "comment" on the situation.
Totally disregarding the facts, they "urged" the HKSAR government to respect freedom of speech and assembly and even "warned" the HKSAR government not to use the damages caused by the protests as what they called "an excuse for suppression."
One can not help but wonder if Capitol Hill or the Palace of Westminster were besieged and ransacked, would the two governments just sit by, would the rights of democracy and freedom be exercised with violence and would the overt challenge to the Constitution and trampling on the law be allowed.
It seems that some politicians of the two longstanding Western powers have an ingrained habit of applying double standards.
The HKSAR is a special administrative region of the People's Republic of China, and its affairs are outright internal affairs of China.
The government and the people of China will not allow any foreign government, organization or individual to interfere in Hong Kong affairs.
Some politicians of the United States and Britain had better get rid of their double standards, stop sending the wrong messages regarding the violent and unlawful acts, end smearing of the "one country, two systems" principle and keep their hands off Hong Kong.
09PETS二级考试精品阅读文章02
09PETS二级考试精品阅读文章03
PETS一级备考辅导
公共英语等级考试写作的练习技巧
考研英语写作之环境保护类范文1
公共英语考场技巧:巧答题得高分
新东方PETS2阅读应试指南(3)
09PETS二级考试精品阅读文章01
考研英语写作之环境保护类范文2
PETS学习方法之词汇记忆攻略
PETS阅读高分突破兼语法学习
考研英语写作常用句型
公共英语四级考试翻译解题技巧总结
2012年下半年PETS等级考试应试指导
考研英语作文预测及范文(4)
考研写作常用短语须知
记忆PETS考试英语单词的五大秘诀
公共英语等级考试阅读解题技巧
考研英语作文闪光词汇分享
PETS阅读技巧:树立大阅读观念
考研英语作文预测及范文(1)
公共英语三级考试成绩快速提高方法指点
考研英语写作指导及方法
PETS考试各题型注意事项
轻松学语法应对公共英语考试
公共英语四级考试翻译解题技巧总结
PETS阅读各种题型详解 (1)
PETS2阅读命题规律和应试
PETS二级考试听力理解题型解析
2012年PETS三级词汇记忆:比较记忆法
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |