BEIJING, April 18 -- U.S. President Donald Trump has since his election campaign been criticizing China for what he said were Beijing's "unfair trade practices," and the recent build-up to what could become a China-U.S. trade war suggests the president is determined to act.
However, a breakdown of facts will show that Washington's excuses for escalating its trade tensions with China do not hold water.
CASUAL DECISION TO IMPOSE TARIFFS ON CHINA
Before explaining how the algorithms by which the United States has come to the conclusion that its trade deficit with China amounts to over 375 billion U.S. dollars are apparently questionable, let's see just how casual Trump's decision, as of now, to impose tariffs on a total of 150 billion dollars worth of Chinese goods is.
"China has been asked to develop a plan for the year of a One Billion Dollar reduction in their massive Trade Deficit with the United States. Our relationship with China has been a very good one, and we look forward to seeing what ideas they come back with. We must act soon!" Trump wrote in a March 7 tweet.
Reports suggesting the number was severely inflated by the Trump administration itself came shortly after the president fired off the tweet.
The Wall Street Journal reported on March 8 that the administration requested that China shave 100 billion dollars off the deficit, citing sources familiar with the matter as saying the request was made by U.S. officials to their Chinese interlocutors a week before.
If a lack of intra-administration communication was not the reason for the obvious discrepancy between Trump and administration officials' assertions, then it seems we can rightly assume that the proposed tally of tariffs was nothing but to add the math up.
BIASED ALGORITHMS IN DETERMINING DEFICIT
Now come the algorithms. The United States calculates trade deficits and surpluses based on where a product is finished instead of on value added, a method that renders its unilaterally-concluded China deficit number unconvincing.
In an opinion piece published on April 2 on the Foreign Affairs magazine's website, Philip Levy wrote: "Since China is the latest stage in the (global value) chain, a finished product can appear to have come from China, even if Chinese value-added is relatively small."
Levy, who tried in his article to justify U.S. acceptance of China's accession into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 as one and the only right decision, pinpointed the exact symptom of Washington's ill-devised calculations.
Indeed, a lot of products with the "made in China" labels oftentimes turn out to be assembled in China using imported parts.
Take Apple's electronic devices for example. According to statistics dating back as early as 2010, 58.5 percent of iPhone's profits went to the Apple company, whereas China's labor cost only constituted 1.8 percent of inputs.
While profits gained by Apple from the iPad slipped to 30 percent in the same year, the percentage of China's labor cost stood at 2 percent, pretty much the same as that of the iPhone and still in stark contrast with Apple's gains.
It is crystal clear that it is the American company -- and subsequently the U.S. economy -- that has harvested most of the profits, not the Chinese assemblers.
Yet, the Apple products, along with many other Chinese-finished commodities, are considered by the Trump administration to be items by which Beijing has taken advantage of Washington.
Moreover, the structure of China-U.S. trade matters as well.
China sells mainly daily necessities to the United States that usually have low profit margins, while the United States sells things like aircraft and automobiles to China, ones that undeniably have more added values.
Trump is so vehemently concerned about bilateral trade balance. If he decides to abandon the cliche of national security concerns and sell high-end equipment to China, he would have overturned the deficit "conundrum" with a flip of the hand.
In fact, Beijing, judging from both the complementary nature of the bilateral trade structure and a win-win point of view, has on multiple occasions urged Washington to loosen its grip on exports that the latter worries comprise "sensitive technologies."
Unfortunately, though, China's efforts have so far been to no avail.
UNFAIR BLAME ON CHINA FOR DECLINE OF MANUFACTURING
Last but not least, as far as the decline of the U.S. manufacturing sector is concerned, there is little the United States can righteously complain about China.
During his presidential campaign, Trump spared no effort to blame China for harming the U.S. manufacturing sector.
Although bringing home American manufacturers was a key pledge in Trump's protectionist "Make America Strong Again" slogan, statistics once again suggests that the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs is more of a domestic issue than something caused by such external reasons as the China factor.
In the same Foreign Affairs article, Levy said the share of manufacturing employment in total U.S. nonfarm payrolls -- the primary indicator used to assess U.S. job creation -- fell from 12 percent in December 2001 to 8.5 percent in December 2017.
He called the decline, which came in the wake of China's accession into the WTO, "a drop of just over 29 percent ... that actually represents a slowing of a preexisting trend."
Levy said the share of labor in U.S. manufacturing fell by more than 33 percent between 1985 and 2001, the 16 years leading up to China's WTO membership. That backed up his conclusion that China, if anything, had actually played a much lesser role in the downward trend.
Turning the calendar back by a further 16-year time, the author said "we can see the same trend in the United States: a 31 percent drop from an initial 25.9 percent in 1969."
"That occurred during a period in which China was largely isolated from the global economy and it therefore cannot be held responsible," Levy said.
国际英语资讯:Canada to host World Circular Economy Forum 2020
美国一女子一边吃麦当劳一边减肥90斤,惊呆了
优衣库高能新app:街上看见好衣服?拍照就能搜
国际英语资讯:Iraqi PM holds session to discuss resignation
金鸡获奖影片看完了?这些新年贺岁电影也不容错过
调查发现:工作时听古典音乐能提高效率
国内英语资讯:Chinese premier urges unremitting efforts to prevent, treat AIDS
亚马逊推出了一个大板子,功能:自动帮你剁手买买买
国内英语资讯:Giant pandas well adapting first winter on Qinghai Plateau
国际英语资讯:BoE governor appointed UN special envoy for climate action
国际英语资讯:Feature: Laundry room in Syrias Aleppo gathers women with loads of clothes, stories
The Things that Money Cant Buy 钱买不到的东西
体坛英语资讯:Kipkorir, Changwony win 2019 Nairobi International Marathon
国际英语资讯:Israel attacks Hamas targets in Gaza
2019年12月英语四级作文范文:卡奴
国内英语资讯:New govt team shows spirit of reform, innovation: Macaos fifth-term chief executive
国际英语资讯:Spotlight: UN climate change conference COP25 opens with focus on challenges
国际英语资讯:Croatia, Germany agree to co-host EU-NATO meeting next year
网恋渐成主流 “E时代新生儿”将迎大爆发
体坛英语资讯:Halep rebounds to defeat Andreescu in WTA finals group stage
国内英语资讯:China suspends Hong Kong visits by U.S. military ships, aircraft, sanctions U.S. NGOs
体坛英语资讯:Hamilton wins F1 Mexican GP but must wait for title win
国际英语资讯:Libyas Tripoli intl airport to resume flights on Dec. 12
昨晚我看到了真爱
国际英语资讯:Over 2 dozen militants killed, 31 IS fighters surrender in Afghanistan
体坛英语资讯:Analysis: Four things we learned in Spains Matchday 10
被危险动物叮咬是什么感觉?《疼痛之王》告诉你
布什:不得人心无所谓
Uber在伦敦失去牌照了,彻底不能运营
美国82岁老太把28岁劫匪打到送医:我又老又孤单但很强
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |