Reader question:
Please explain “whip hand”, as in this: Voters have the whip hand.
My comments:
In other words, your votes count. They mean something.
In an election for public office, for example, voters via their votes control who gets elected. Therefore, indirectly, they control the man or woman and their policies.
That’s the ideal, i.e. idealistic situation. Usually, you see, after people get elected, they begin to ignore their policy promises. Or, to put it another way, they often fail to keep their promises for whatever reason.
Otherwise, the world would’ve been different.
I mean, we won’t delve into it because it’s a big topic to tackle. Here, let’s instead be satisfied with mastering the phrase “whip hand”.
Whip hand, you see, is literally the hand that wields the whip. If you go to places driving a cart horse, as was the case in the old days before automobiles occupy all the streets, you’ll see the point immediately. The driver, by cracking the whip, leads the horse to go to this place and that, wherever.
Hence, he who has the whip in hand is the one who is in control. Metaphorically speaking, people who have the whip hand have power over others in a particular situation.
In other words, they have, um, the upper hand.
If, for example, we say so-and-so always have the whip hand over another, we notice that this so-and-so gets to boss the other one around.
If, for another example, someone is given the whip hand, they are given the rein, so to speak, and get to do pretty much what they want, whatever they want.
Here are more examples, in greater detail, from the media:
1. Modern medicine may help us to discover the real reasons behind King George III’s erratic behaviour, writes historian Lucy Worsley.
George III is well known in children’s history books for being the “mad king who lost America”.
In recent years, though, it has become fashionable among historians to put his “madness” down to the physical, genetic blood disorder called porphyria. Its symptoms include aches and pains, as well as blue urine.
The theory formed the basis of a long-running play by Alan Bennett, The Madness of George III, which was later adapted for film starring Nigel Hawthorne in the title role.
However, a new research project based at St George’s, University of London, has concluded that George III did actually suffer from mental illness after all.
Using the evidence of thousands of George III’s own handwritten letters, Dr Peter Garrard and Dr Vassiliki Rentoumi have been analysing his use of language. They have discovered that during his episodes of illness, his sentences were much longer than when he was well.
A sentence containing 400 words and eight verbs was not unusual. George III, when ill, often repeated himself, and at the same time his vocabulary became much more complex, creative and colourful.
These are features that can be seen today in the writing and speech of patients experiencing the manic phase of psychiatric illnesses such as bipolar disorder.
Mania, or harmful euphoria, is at one end of a spectrum of mood disorders, with sadness, or depression, at the other. George’s being in a manic state would also match contemporary descriptions of his illness by witnesses.
They spoke of his “incessant loquacity” and his habit of talking until the foam ran out of his mouth. Sometimes he suffered from convulsions, and his pages had to sit on him to keep him safe on the floor.
The researchers have even thrown doubt on one of the key planks in the case for porphyria, the blue urine. George III’s medical records show that the king was given medicine based on gentian. This plant, with its deep blue flowers, is still used today as a mild tonic, but may turn the urine blue.
So maybe it wasn’t the king’s “madness” that caused his most famous symptom. It could have simply been his medicine. ...
George III’s recurring bouts of illness caused him to withdraw from daily business to recuperate out of the public eye at secluded Kew Palace, near Richmond.
Each time he withdrew to Kew, this triggered a crisis - who was to make decisions in his absence?
His son, the Prince of Wales, with whom George III had a terrible relationship, wanted to be appointed regent, and to act as the king in everything but name. But the future George IV was very much associated with the political opposition, and the government was determined to keep him out.
Strikingly, although the crisis caused a good deal of arguing, it was in fact resolved quite easily. This was partly because the king just got better (despite the bizarre and sometimes inhumane treatments given to him by the royal doctors) and partly because he was, by this stage in British history, a constitutional king.
When the Hanoverians had been invited over from Germany in 1714 to take the throne after the failure of the Stuart line, they came at the invitation of Parliament. Parliament therefore held the whip hand over them, and the powers of the monarchy declined.
But despite his illness, George III was a dedicated and diligent king, and won the respect of his politicians. In fact, when his illness drove him off the political scene, they realised how much they needed his calming effect on their squabbles.
It is counter-intuitive to suggest it, but royal health issues can actually strengthen the monarchy, not least by creating sympathy and affection for an afflicted individual.
- What was the truth about the madness of George III? BBC.com, April 15, 2013.
2. Two New York city council members, Brad Lander and Ritchie Torres, have called for an end to “school segregation” in the city and the elimination of “apartheid schools”—meaning schools in which 90 percent of the students are either black or Latino. Others have defined “apartheid schools” as those with less than 1 percent white enrollment.
The term “apartheid,” of course, refers to the brutal system of legalized racial segregation that existed in South Africa from 1948 to 1994. Its use is meant to convey the sense that an elite minority population wields the whip hand over a racial majority. Most New Yorkers would probably wonder what the city’s Department of Education—not known as a nest of white supremacy—has in common with a programmatic policy of racial classification and restriction. While New York, like America in general, has divisions of income that sometimes cleave along ethno-racial lines, no well-off black or Latino families in New York are prevented from moving into any neighborhood they can afford. Ethnic enclaves in New York are largely determined by group affinity. Chinese immigrants have gravitated toward communities in Lower Manhattan, Brooklyn’s Sunset Park, and Flushing, Queens, but it would be absurd to suggest that Asian-Americans in New York are somehow victims of segregation, along the lines of Jim Crow-era Dixie.
The 90 percent black and Hispanic figure cited by Lander and Torres is striking until one considers that more than two out of three kids (68 percent) in the city’s public school system are black and Latino. It thus takes only a minimal amount of population concentration for a public school to fall into the “apartheid” category—in which, as Lander and Torres see it, poor children are concentrated with one another in schools that consign them to “steep disadvantage.” The council members assert that “the average black or Latino student attends a school where nearly 70% of the students are low-income.” But again, context is needed: according to the Department of Education, 78 percent of all students in the system are poor or attend schools where all students get free lunches. And 90 percent of all city public schools have student bodies that are at least 50 percent poor. So it’s no surprise that black and Latino kids attend primarily lower-income schools.
- New York Has No “Apartheid” Schools, City-Journal.org, August 18, 2017.
3. Unloved, untimely, and unnecessary, the putative free trade pact between Europe and America is dying a slow death.
The Dutch people have amassed 100,000 signatures calling for a referendum on this Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP as we know it. The number is likely to soar after Greenpeace leaked 248 pages of negotiation papers over the weekend. The documents do not exactly show a “race to the bottom in environmental, consumer protection and public health standards” - as Greenpeace alleges - but they do raise red flags over who sets our laws and who holds the whip hand over our eviscerated parliaments.
Dutch voters have already rebuked Brussels once this year, throwing out an association agreement with Ukraine in what was really a protest against the wider conduct of European affairs by an EU priesthood that long ago lost touch with economic and political reality.
French president François Hollande cannot hide from that reality. Faced with approval ratings of 13pc in the latest TNS-Sofres poll, a TTIP mutiny within his own Socialist Party, and electoral annihilation in 2017, he is retreating. “We don't want unbridled free trade. We will never accept that basic principles are threatened,” he said.
In Germany, just 17pc now back the project, and barely half even accept that free trade itself a “good thing”, an astonishing turn for a mercantilist country that has geared its industrial system to exports.
The criticisms have struck home. The Dutch, Germans, and French, have come to suspect that TTIP is a secretive stitch-up by corporate lawyers, yet another backroom deal that allows the owners of capital to game the international system at the expense of common people.
- Let the TTIP trade pact die if it threatens Parliamentary democracy, Telegraph.co.uk, May 4, 2016.
About the author:
Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.
2013年高考英语北京卷听力真题+原文+答案+MP3
2010年全国高考上海英语听力试题
2014高考英语听力辅导:对话中常用的关键词
2014高考英语听力试题答题攻略
2015高考英语听力提前读题的意义
高考英语听力全真模拟15(2005年高考英语听力全-全国卷I)
六人行(老友记)friends第9季第14集
2010年全国高考英语听力大全
掌握快速读题技巧 高考英语听力稳得高分
高考冲刺阅读理解专项强化训练
2015高考英语听力考点归纳
2010年高考英语北京卷听力真题+原文+答案+MP3
高考英语听力:提高“有法可依”
高考英语听力全真模拟03
2014高考英语听力辅导:否定意义的句型结构
2014高考英语听力辅导:抓住话语中的指示词
2011年高考英语北京卷听力真题+原文+答案+MP3
高考英语听力全真模拟05
2015高考英语听力提分实用技巧
高考英语听力满分技巧:5点决定成败
2011年高考英语全国卷听力真题+原文+答案+MP3
2014高考英语听力辅导:用否定短语表达否定含义
2010年高考英语阅读理解自测试题二
高考英语听力出现频率最高的十个场景词汇集合
高考英语听力全真模拟02
2014高考英语听力辅导:领会对话中的重点句
2009-2014年高考北京卷英语听力真题+原文+答案+MP3汇总
高考英语听力真题精讲:巧妙推断言外之意
高考英语听力提分技巧3篇
2010年全国高考北京英语听力试题
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |