Reader question:
Please explain this headline: Politicians huff and puff – markets call their bluff (Reuters, August 12, 2011).
My comments:
Good question – we will try to kill two or three birds with one stone by mastering three words and two idioms at one go.
The three words are “huff”, “puff” and “bluff”, the two idioms being “huff and puff”, “call their bluff”.
First the three “ff” words.
To huff is to catch in short and quick breaths. The puff is to let the air out in an equally short and hurried manner. To bluff on the other hand is to brag, exaggerate one’s good qualities.
Now, when do people huff and puff?
Yes, when they’re exerting themselves and are getting tired and exhausted. Hence to huff and puff suggests great physical and mental effort.
To call someone’s bluff, on the other hand, is to point flat out that they’re bragging, i.e. telling better stories about themselves in order to make them look better. Hence, to call someone’s bluff suggests that they’ve been lying, deceiving, not telling the truth – in other words, they’re not as good, competent or effective as they say they are.
In the top example, politicians, whenever they are described as huffing and puffing as a matter of fact, are working hard at talking empty talks, promising many measures they say they are taking or are about to take in order to improve the economy.
However, markets, the stock markets that is, keep calling their bluff, i.e. the stock markets never respond in a positive manner. In fact, from New York to Shanghai, London to Tokyo, share prices continue to fall.
To wit, sluggish markets make an unequivocal statement – that world leaders are not effective, even though they go on bragging and whimpering about how capable they are.
To call someone’s bluff, by the way, is an expression developed originally from the game of poker. To bluff in poker is to subtly give your opponents the impression that you have a much stronger hand than you actually possess. This exaggeration of the truth is meant to intimidate the opponents, forcing them to quit or at least waver in their attempt to mount effective counter-attacks.
This is perfectly in compliance, of course, with the principles of Sun Tzu’s Art of War, which stipulates that the best war-winning strategy is to win without battle, by creating an impression, for example, that you outnumber the enemy by 10 to one, thus convincing the enemy that they cannot possibly win. Hence the enemy surrenders without putting up a fight. Hence and therefore bloodshed is avoided.
To call your bluff, on the other hand, is for the opponent to tell you straight in the face that you’re fooling. In other words, they have seen through your tricks. They realize that you’re a paper tiger, all show and no substance.
That means trouble for you, of course.
Alright, here’s a media example of “calling someone’s bluff” to hammer the point home:
In President Barack Obama’s most recent State of the Union address, he vowed to “win the future” by jumpstarting innovation through ambitious government investment in education, research, technology and infrastructure. In the wake of the recent debt ceiling debacle, this rarefied promise has dwindled miserably into its unfortunate acronymic husk: WTF.
While there is plenty of blame to spread around the Beltway for these manufactured debt-ceiling shenanigans, the role of the US media deserves our keen attention. The media – and, in particular, their treatment of the Tea Party movement – have been a key ingredient in this recipe for political dysfunction.
But let’s start with the most obvious culprit. To say President Obama fell prey to Republican brinkmanship is to give the GOP too much credit. Obama entered negotiations braying about a balanced approach that included tax increases for the super-rich, but once hunkered at the negotiating table, he got worked over like a Grand Canyon pack mule. Lowlights include a mid July meeting when the president reportedly told Virginia Republican Eric Cantor, “Eric, don’t call my bluff.” This slip of the tongue could be the laugh track for an amateur hour poker tournament. At the high-stakes negotiations with “real deal” government funds on the congressional chopping block, Obama’s remark foretold disaster.
Then, there’s the Tea Party movement. In a way, you’ve got to hand it to them. They’ve managed to hijack the national conversation from job creation and overall economic health to one of deficit and default. This despite the fact that a recent CBS News/New York Times poll found that when asked to identify the most important problem currently facing the United States, more than half (53%) responded jobs or the economy while a mere 7% mentioned the budget deficit or national debt.
- How the Tea Party turned the media’s ‘liberal bias’, Guardian.co.uk, August 5, 2011.
About the author:
Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.
浅谈词汇基础对雅思听力备考的重要性
雅思听力考试的5个特点及学习方法
适用于雅思听力备考的立体训练法
如何提高雅思听力的基本能力
从表述形式详解雅思听力考试中的观点题
雅思听力高分的4个解题步骤
详解雅思听力考试中的七个陷阱
雅思听力考试时如何调整紧张心情
增加雅思听力备考效率的练习方法
雅思听力填空题和选择题的猜题技巧
雅思听力考试需要遵循的原则与运用技巧
分享雅思听力租房场景的备考指南
雅思听力:影子练习法助你拉长瞬间记忆
四个实用的雅思听力词汇背诵方法
雅思听力图形标签题的三种分类
中国考生备考雅思听力的三种状态
雅思听力Section 1的常见场景总结
雅思听力考前一周要加强“边听边记”训练
雅思听力Section4的应试技巧及常见话题介绍
雅思听力反应速度慢需要对症下药
拿下雅思听力考试高分的6个策略
雅思听力旅游场景的出题思路和考点归纳
雅思听力动物场景中的冷门知识点
适合不同学生的雅思听力备考方案
雅思听力记笔记时要同时做到的两件事
雅思听力答题的三大失分点总结
13条实用的雅思听力答题规律
雅思听力小词分析:but
雅思听力提高的难点在哪里
雅思听力心得分享:一次只看一个session
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |