Reader question:
Please explain “for good”, as in, “Twitter is a force for good” and “He’s here for good.”
My comments:
These two examples of “for good” are different. They’re not all for the common “good” (not “common good”, which is another matter entirely), as in good and bad.
In the first example, “Twitter is a force for good” is a fixed phrase. Here, “good” means morally right, as in “good and evil”. In talking about Twitter being a force for good, the speaker means to point out the fact that people sharing information quickly and en mass is a good thing, socially progressive that is.
In second example, “He’s here for good”, the phrase to note is “for good” and here it means for ever, or permanently. In other words, he’s here to stay – for a long time and perhaps never to leave again.
Back to “force for good” for one moment. The Internet, in general, is a force for good, you may argue. Information (knowledge) is important. Crucial. With up-to-date (or up-to-the-minute in the case of Twitter) information, an individual is more likely to make the right decisions for himself. Obviously. On a larger scale, instant spread of information helps social stability as it may help curb systematic malpractice. Governments, for example, knowing that the public knows exactly what they’re up to, will think twice before going ahead with any potentially unpopular initiatives. The Nazis, to use a horrible example, would never be able to do the terrible things they did to the Jews in this age, the age of the Internet.
This is why people both here and in the West keep striving for (greater) transparency in government.
That is also why Wikileaks is so popular at the moment.
Popular at the popular level at any rate.
Anyways, I think the world is, by and large, I mean, speaking in broad terms and not to put too fine a point on it better off with Twitter, Wikileaks and the Internet in general.
I means, at least the world will be a better off place if all people know what phrases such as “for good” means.
So then, how does one learn these things, such as a simple and innocuous sounding phrase like “for good”?
Speaking for myself and through experience, I think one picks these things up via reading rather than through the classroom, you know, through asking the teacher to EXPLAIN everything.
I, for example, can’t explain why “he’s here for good” means he’ll be here for ever. I’ve never looked it up in dictionary either, but I somehow have come to know that it’s a common colloquialism that’s been in use for centuries. For instance, I find this example from an old classic, Great Expectations by Charles Dickens, in a conversation between Pip and his benefactor, the ex-convict who’s come back from Australia:
“Is there no chance person who might identify you in the street?” said I.
“Well,” he returned, “there ain’t many. Nor yet I don’t intend to advertise myself in the newspapers by the name of A. M. come back from Botany Bay; and years have rolled away, and who’s to gain by it? Still, look’ee here, Pip. If the danger had been fifty times as great, I should ha’ come to see you, mind you, just the same.”
“And how long do you remain?”
“How long?” said he, taking his black pipe from his mouth, and dropping his jaw as he stared at me. “I’m not a-going back. I’ve come for good.”
In short, one learns best from real examples, in passing and via context. Here are two up-to-date examples from the media:
1. The world is deeply divided on the question of whether religion is a force for good, a survey by Ipsos Reid suggests.
The pollster found that 48 per cent of the more than 18,000 people it reached online in 23 countries agreed that “religion provides the common values and ethical foundations that diverse societies need to thrive in the 21st century.”
A bare majority — 52 per cent — thought otherwise. They agreed with the sentiment that “religious beliefs promote intolerance, exacerbate ethnic divisions and impede social progress.”
There was wide regional variation in the results. Respondents in Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, where there are large Muslim populations, overwhelmingly said they believed religion was a force for good, while respondents in European countries tended to disagree with that.
About two-thirds of Americans polled thought religion was a force for good, but only 36 per cent of Canadians thought the same.
- Poll underlines sharp divide on religion, CBC News, November 26, 2010.
2. The Dallas Mavericks are plotting an aggressive push to acquire Carmelo Anthony, even if they don’t get assurances that the three-time All-Star would agree to a contract extension as part of the trade, league sources told CBSSports.com.
Despite his team’s emergence as one of the powers of the Western Conference -- and, as Dallas proved Monday night in Miami, the whole league -- owner Mark Cuban is said to be not only willing to take a chance on Anthony, but eager to steal him from the Nets, who are owned by his billionaire rival, Mikhail Prokhorov. In a deal that would provide Denver with little more than future savings, the Mavs are planning what one rival executive described as a “hard” push...
Another team that various team executives believe is very much in the mix -- either to make a push to land Melo as a rental or become involved as a third-team facilitator -- is the Rockets. Houston fully expects to receive a disabled-player exception for Yao Ming totaling $5.8 million and already has a $6.3 million exception from the Trevor Ariza trade. Such exceptions can’t be combined, but individually they could be used to absorb a contract -- such as, for example, the Nuggets’ J.R. Smith’s or Harrington’s -- without sending equal money back. In return, the Rockets would either have to get a player they want or be compensated accordingly with draft picks or other assets. The Rockets also are flush with the expiring contracts of Shane Battier, Jared Jeffries, and even Yao, whose contract is insured due to his season-ending foot injury.
Rockets owner Leslie Alexander has a history of bold moves, and has placed few restrictions on his front office, led by GM Daryl Morey, to spend money in order to win. The Rockets, for example, are currently a tax-paying team and are under no mandate from ownership to shed salary even though they are off to a slow start and have lost Yao for the season -- and maybe for good.
- Sources: Mavs poised to enter Melo chase, CBSSports.com, December 21, 2010.
雅思听力备考练习方法介绍
浅谈雅思听力中的衔接手段
适合不同学生的雅思听力备考方案
雅思听力考试时如何调整紧张心情
适用于雅思听力备考的立体训练法
雅思听力:心理原因造成的“落差”需引以为戒
四个实用的雅思听力词汇背诵方法
初学者如何准备雅思听力考试?
从表述形式详解雅思听力考试中的观点题
详解雅思听力中的对话与独白
雅思听力备考的魔鬼训练法
雅思听力中的高频地名总结
雅思听力提高的难点在哪里
浅谈词汇基础对雅思听力备考的重要性
雅思听力的提高需要长期的努力
雅思听力答题的三大失分点总结
雅思听力Section4的应试技巧及常见话题介绍
增加雅思听力备考效率的练习方法
雅思听力中的三种信号词分析
雅思听力提高需要技巧和实力的结合
雅思听力:影子练习法助你拉长瞬间记忆
雅思听力考试的5个特点及学习方法
雅思听力高分奥秘:从声音到全篇
雅思听力旅游场景的出题思路和考点归纳
雅思听力Section 1的常见场景总结
雅思听力小词分析:but
浅谈雅思听力技巧中的“读”和“猜”
雅思听力的三类场景分析
雅思听力心得分享:一次只看一个session
雅思听力动物场景中的冷门知识点
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |