My column in last week's issue of this newspaper triggered an intense response from readers, who posted their comments online. My sincere thanks go to them all, whether proponents or opponents, whose remarks enlightened me in different ways and on different levels.
Though I generally do not give my feedback to readers' comments, online or in print, I would like to go deeper into the topic of my last column with regard to some of my critics' points of view.
The critics' repudiation of my accusation of Western media's bias against China focused on three points: first, the media's role is not to applaud a government but to keep a watchful eye on it; second, Western media do not have the obligation to manage China's image abroad; third, the Chinese media is biased itself for it "only reports bad news from abroad".
Right, media need to monitor the government rather than praise it. But this seems irrelevant to my argument, which concerns the Western media's portrayal of China rather the Chinese government.
Again, it is right that the Western media are not responsible "to manage China's image abroad". However, I did not say that. All I said was that the Western media had been tarnishing China's image before the world by focusing only on the negative aspects of the country.
Actually this controversy touches on a question that seems to have been ignored so far. The question is: What do the Western media come to China for?
My understanding is that a media organization send their journalists to another country to report whatever they see there so that their compatriots at home will get the right information about that country. For instance, social, political, economic and geographical conditions; the culture and customs; the people's livelihood; the potential for external investment and cooperation, and so on. In all, facts, both positive and negative.
Faithful reports about a foreign country's real, all-inclusive status quo is beneficial for exchanges between peoples of that country and the media's home country. Focusing only on the negative aspects of the country a foreign reporter stays in while saying nothing about the positive things is not only unfair to that country but is also cheating his/her compatriots at home.
Now, the third question in the controversy: Do the Chinese media "only reports bad news from abroad"? The person who wrote that comment challenged me to "do a quick calculation" about the Chinese media's stories on foreign countries about how many are positive and how many are negative.
This really embarrasses me for I never am good at "quick calculations". I can only speak from my general impression of Chinese media's reports on Western countries and can definitely state that the accusation is absolutely wrong.
Since China began opening itself to the outside world, a huge number of people have been to Western countries. After returning home, many wrote articles about their impressions of the countries and most of them were full of praise of the people's civilized manners, the clean environment and high efficiency in economic operations.
My wife once worked in Sydney as a correspondent for a Chinese media organization. She wrote a lot of stories about Australia. Most were "positive" reports. I have visited a number of Western countries but have seldom written stories about them. Of the few stories I have written - about four or five - none was negative. Two of them were actually "praising" Australia and the United States, for I criticized the uncivilized manners of some Chinese tourists in comparison with the people of those two countries.
Of course, my wife and I did not write "positive" stories to "manage the image" of the two Western countries. We wrote them to help our compatriots learn from the finer points of the Western world.
Finally, as for whether the Western media distort the truth. Need I say any more? The recent coverage of the riots in Tibet is the most forceful evidence to support my allegation. Now the whole world has seen that.
外媒:智能手机屏幕调暗真能省电吗?
外媒看中国 动物变身南京市地震预报员
为什么长城在渐渐消失?
女性每周花90分钟纠结穿什么
债务危机中的希腊旅游攻略
教育部严禁“有偿补课”
韩国的创意经济
准新娘真会玩:厕纸婚纱风潮来袭
2015上半年网络流行语双语版出炉啦!
夏天必备!全球最棒的10家冰淇淋店!
自助业的革新:麦当劳,“配”你所爱
大众工厂机器人杀人是工业事故
《纽约时报》详解:希腊经济危机始末
罗琳爆料 弗农姨夫为啥讨厌哈利波特
比伯新爱好:中式拔火罐
中国楼市出现复苏迹象
李克强敦促欧盟与中国达成双边投资协定
德日二战反思录译成八语种
希腊公投否决援助方案 或退出欧元区
德国文化 德国红灯亮了28年
解决伦敦交通需要的不是自行车
转眼16周年 贝克汉姆全家福秀甜蜜
优步将收购部分微软地图技术
中国互联网巨擘加紧争夺O2O市场
《花千骨》英文片花逆袭:玛丽苏台词合集
史上最强汽车防盗法 你绝对想不到
以技术革命拯救地球
印巴将加入“上合组织”
中美高科技公司角逐印度市场
再买就剁手 男性冲动购物比女性花费多
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |