My column in last week's issue of this newspaper triggered an intense response from readers, who posted their comments online. My sincere thanks go to them all, whether proponents or opponents, whose remarks enlightened me in different ways and on different levels.
Though I generally do not give my feedback to readers' comments, online or in print, I would like to go deeper into the topic of my last column with regard to some of my critics' points of view.
The critics' repudiation of my accusation of Western media's bias against China focused on three points: first, the media's role is not to applaud a government but to keep a watchful eye on it; second, Western media do not have the obligation to manage China's image abroad; third, the Chinese media is biased itself for it "only reports bad news from abroad".
Right, media need to monitor the government rather than praise it. But this seems irrelevant to my argument, which concerns the Western media's portrayal of China rather the Chinese government.
Again, it is right that the Western media are not responsible "to manage China's image abroad". However, I did not say that. All I said was that the Western media had been tarnishing China's image before the world by focusing only on the negative aspects of the country.
Actually this controversy touches on a question that seems to have been ignored so far. The question is: What do the Western media come to China for?
My understanding is that a media organization send their journalists to another country to report whatever they see there so that their compatriots at home will get the right information about that country. For instance, social, political, economic and geographical conditions; the culture and customs; the people's livelihood; the potential for external investment and cooperation, and so on. In all, facts, both positive and negative.
Faithful reports about a foreign country's real, all-inclusive status quo is beneficial for exchanges between peoples of that country and the media's home country. Focusing only on the negative aspects of the country a foreign reporter stays in while saying nothing about the positive things is not only unfair to that country but is also cheating his/her compatriots at home.
Now, the third question in the controversy: Do the Chinese media "only reports bad news from abroad"? The person who wrote that comment challenged me to "do a quick calculation" about the Chinese media's stories on foreign countries about how many are positive and how many are negative.
This really embarrasses me for I never am good at "quick calculations". I can only speak from my general impression of Chinese media's reports on Western countries and can definitely state that the accusation is absolutely wrong.
Since China began opening itself to the outside world, a huge number of people have been to Western countries. After returning home, many wrote articles about their impressions of the countries and most of them were full of praise of the people's civilized manners, the clean environment and high efficiency in economic operations.
My wife once worked in Sydney as a correspondent for a Chinese media organization. She wrote a lot of stories about Australia. Most were "positive" reports. I have visited a number of Western countries but have seldom written stories about them. Of the few stories I have written - about four or five - none was negative. Two of them were actually "praising" Australia and the United States, for I criticized the uncivilized manners of some Chinese tourists in comparison with the people of those two countries.
Of course, my wife and I did not write "positive" stories to "manage the image" of the two Western countries. We wrote them to help our compatriots learn from the finer points of the Western world.
Finally, as for whether the Western media distort the truth. Need I say any more? The recent coverage of the riots in Tibet is the most forceful evidence to support my allegation. Now the whole world has seen that.
史上最离谱的猫咪遮羞物
耶伦面对格林斯潘难题
万万没想到!这些地方有wifi
美国人也看面相 奥巴马是有能力的面孔
应对风暴的斯沃琪
中兴回购股票的政治考虑
企鹅中的旱鸭子:落水后死命挣扎愁煞饲养员
关于马克·扎克伯格和脸书的10个事实(2)
比尔·盖茨的夏季读书清单
大圣归来:这只猴子终于惊艳了外国人!
人见人爱 2个问题决定印象分
瑞安航空邀乘客为自己代言
现金购物减肥 刷卡会买更多垃圾食品
《湛江宣言》全文
紫光收购美光的逻辑
世行正式撤回对中国金融业的批评
迪拜智能棕榈树:有WiFi能充电
张晋为爱而战 国民男神时来运转
环保节水 一厢情愿的政策难奏效
2015艾美奖提名揭晓
万万没想到:这些东西都被送入了太空!
中国第二季度经济增长率7% 稳定适度
中国设首个世行“信托基金”
坐拥儿女心系苍生:威廉王子当起空中救护员
中国电影山寨《赛车总动员》,观众不买账
北京市宣布市政府外迁计划
曲线女人长寿 宽臀降低发病风险
万达加速转型 构建四大支柱产业
英国人聊中国人睡 澳洲旅客爱买醉
境外基金撤离中国股市
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |