The general density dependence model can be applied to explain the founding of specialist firms (those attempting to serve a narrow target market). According to this model, specialist foundings hinge on the interplay between legitimation and competitive forces, both of which are functions of the density (total number) of firms in a particular specialist population. Legitimation occurs as a new type of firm moves from being viewed as unfamiliar to being viewed as a natural way to organize. At low density levels, each founding increases legitimation, reducing barriers to entry and easing subsequent foundings. Competition occurs because the resources that firms seek--customers, suppliers, and employees--are limited, but as long as density is low relative to plentiful resources, the addition of another firm has a negligible impact on the intensity of competition. At high density levels, however, competitive effects outweigh legitimation effects, discouraging foundings. The more numerous the competitors, the fiercer the competition will be and the smaller will be the incentive for new firms to enter the field.
While several studies have found a significant correspondence between the density dependence model and actual patterns of foundings, other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model. A possible explanation for this inconsistency is that legitimation and competitive forces transcend national boundaries, while studies typically restrict their analysis to the national level. Thus a national-level analysis can understate the true legitimation and competitive forces as well as the number of foundings in an industry that is internationally integrated. Many industries are or are becoming international, and since media and information easily cross national borders, so should legitimation and its effects on overseas foundings. For example, if a type of firm becomes established in the United States, that information transcends borders, reduces uncertainties, and helps foundings of that type of firm in other countries. Even within national contexts, studies have found more support for the density dependence model when they employ broader geographic units of analysis--for example, finding that the model\'s operation is seen more clearly at the state and national levels than at city levels.
Question #4.
According to the passage, which of the following may account for the inconsistency between the general density dependence model and the evidence provided by certain studies of foundings?
(A) Such studies have overemphasized the impact of preexisting firms on the establishment of new firms.
(B) Such studies have not focused strongly enough on the role of competition among newly established firms operating at the city and state levels.
(C) Such studies fail to differentiate among specialist firms with regard to the degree to which they deviate from familiar forms of organization.
(D) Such studies have not taken into account the fact that many industries are internationally integrated.
(E) Such studies have neglected to investigate firms that attempt to serve only a narrow target market.
Question #5.
In the second paragraph, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) noting various exceptions to a certain general finding
(B) examining the impact of one type of industry on another
(C) proposing a possible explanation for an inconsistency
(D) providing specific examples of a particular phenomenon
(E) defending the validity of a particular study\'s conclusions
Question #6.
The passage suggests that when a population of specialist firms reaches a high density level, which of the following is likely to occur?
(A) Foundings will decline despite legitimation that has occurred in these industries.
(B) Increasing competition will encourage many firms to broaden their target market.
(C) Competition for resources will become stabilized and thus foundings will be encouraged.
(D) Many customers will abandon their loyalty to older firms as more innovative firms enter the market.
(E) Firms will begin to cross national borders in an attempt to gain a competitive advantage.
Question #7.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) question the validity of an economic model
(B) point out some inconsistencies within an economic model
(C) outline an economic model and suggest revisions to it
(D) describe an economic model and provide specific examples to illustrate its use
(E) explain why an economic model remains valid despite inconsistent research results
瑞典赛刘翔抢跑遭罚下 罗伯斯轻松夺冠
今年你想要挑战什么?
立即恢复体能的6种方法
2017NBA全明星赛西部险胜东部队 杜兰特荣膺MVP
1/3男性愿意和不爱的女人走进婚姻围墙
英国现私立离婚法庭:离婚可秘密进行
名画《呐喊》将拍卖估价超八千万美元
中国建筑师王澍获普利兹克奖
凤姐看不上林书豪 因为林书豪不够帅
巴黎获评最佳大学城市 伦敦全球第二
手纸筒里的无限创意
中国网友占领奥巴马Google+ 戏称推广汉语人人有责
苹果引发教育新革命
你是一个成功者吗?
美国白宫提出“网络隐私权议案”
关于狗狗你不知道的10件事
“龙抬头”传统习俗英语版
爱因斯坦错了?还是电缆松了?
科学家发现爱情功效堪比毒品
“羊群效应”引发团购热潮?
乌镇:江南水乡的诗意生活
唯冠诉苹果侵权案上海开庭 iPad或遭禁售
职场双语:八个被遗忘的求职秘诀
英国将为外来人口免费治疗艾滋病
英语全球化的功与过
四年一遇的2.29:女生表白求婚的专属日!
“雷锋精神”的新诠释
美版《福尔摩斯》开拍 刘玉玲扮演华生
巴菲特公开信认错 股神误判楼市错得离谱
网络制造爱情 也终结爱情
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |