The general density dependence model can be applied to explain the founding of specialist firms (those attempting to serve a narrow target market). According to this model, specialist foundings hinge on the interplay between legitimation and competitive forces, both of which are functions of the density (total number) of firms in a particular specialist population. Legitimation occurs as a new type of firm moves from being viewed as unfamiliar to being viewed as a natural way to organize. At low density levels, each founding increases legitimation, reducing barriers to entry and easing subsequent foundings. Competition occurs because the resources that firms seek--customers, suppliers, and employees--are limited, but as long as density is low relative to plentiful resources, the addition of another firm has a negligible impact on the intensity of competition. At high density levels, however, competitive effects outweigh legitimation effects, discouraging foundings. The more numerous the competitors, the fiercer the competition will be and the smaller will be the incentive for new firms to enter the field.
While several studies have found a significant correspondence between the density dependence model and actual patterns of foundings, other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model. A possible explanation for this inconsistency is that legitimation and competitive forces transcend national boundaries, while studies typically restrict their analysis to the national level. Thus a national-level analysis can understate the true legitimation and competitive forces as well as the number of foundings in an industry that is internationally integrated. Many industries are or are becoming international, and since media and information easily cross national borders, so should legitimation and its effects on overseas foundings. For example, if a type of firm becomes established in the United States, that information transcends borders, reduces uncertainties, and helps foundings of that type of firm in other countries. Even within national contexts, studies have found more support for the density dependence model when they employ broader geographic units of analysis--for example, finding that the model\'s operation is seen more clearly at the state and national levels than at city levels.
Question #4.
According to the passage, which of the following may account for the inconsistency between the general density dependence model and the evidence provided by certain studies of foundings?
(A) Such studies have overemphasized the impact of preexisting firms on the establishment of new firms.
(B) Such studies have not focused strongly enough on the role of competition among newly established firms operating at the city and state levels.
(C) Such studies fail to differentiate among specialist firms with regard to the degree to which they deviate from familiar forms of organization.
(D) Such studies have not taken into account the fact that many industries are internationally integrated.
(E) Such studies have neglected to investigate firms that attempt to serve only a narrow target market.
Question #5.
In the second paragraph, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) noting various exceptions to a certain general finding
(B) examining the impact of one type of industry on another
(C) proposing a possible explanation for an inconsistency
(D) providing specific examples of a particular phenomenon
(E) defending the validity of a particular study\'s conclusions
Question #6.
The passage suggests that when a population of specialist firms reaches a high density level, which of the following is likely to occur?
(A) Foundings will decline despite legitimation that has occurred in these industries.
(B) Increasing competition will encourage many firms to broaden their target market.
(C) Competition for resources will become stabilized and thus foundings will be encouraged.
(D) Many customers will abandon their loyalty to older firms as more innovative firms enter the market.
(E) Firms will begin to cross national borders in an attempt to gain a competitive advantage.
Question #7.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) question the validity of an economic model
(B) point out some inconsistencies within an economic model
(C) outline an economic model and suggest revisions to it
(D) describe an economic model and provide specific examples to illustrate its use
(E) explain why an economic model remains valid despite inconsistent research results
托福听力陷阱:盘点听力中的“同音词”
托福听力四大音变现象应对指导
英语听力:励志狗”粘上武汉驴友 奔跑1700公里去西藏
如何做好托福听力:技巧总结-Link
新东方名师:中高级口译口语话题之家庭教育
名师:你该掌握的“英语谚语佳句汇总”(O部分)
口语点滴:“梦中情人”与“首映”
托福听力场景词汇:打工场景
2011秋季基础口译名师点睛:听译备考策略
2011秋季基础口译名师点睛:Short conversation 全攻略(1)
雅思听力最难部分Section4的应试技巧
2011秋季基础口译名师点睛:如何有效准备口译口语
2012年12月英语四六级听力高分技巧
揭秘英语学多年 仍听不懂母语人士说话的5大原因
如何克服演讲中的紧张情绪
英语四六级听力冲刺:不可小看的7类小词
托福听力指导:分类词汇之学生生活
2012年6月四六级考前十天:听力最后冲刺
朝鲜阅兵庆祝金日成诞辰百年(视频)
名师:你该掌握的“英语谚语佳句汇总”(S部分)
多说多练 英语口语学习必备武器
雅思听力场景词汇:计算机房场景
如何做好托福听力:技巧总结-Purpose
雅思听力考试中常见的动植物话题总结
雅思听力技巧:好习惯能有效提高雅思听力成绩
盘点雅思听力考试的冷门得分点
雅思听力难题解析:搭配题
高分技巧:雅思听力考试时间的高效利用方法
英语听力视频:女教师舍身救人双腿遭截肢
练好英语口语的“锦囊小妙计”
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |