【英文原文】
Eight hard truths about online media
Many a consumer looks at an “overnight sensation” such as Twitter or Facebook and muses: “That service is so simple — I could do that.” If only it were true.
It turns out that starting a business on the web is hard. Very hard. And I’m not talking about the technology – although that part is hard, too. I’m talking about the business part: building a user base and finding a way to make money. Those are really hard problems.
Whether you’re a start-up or an established company, here are the hard truths you must face if you want to build a successful online media property.
All the good names are taken. All the “real word” URL’s are taken and buying one will cost you a pretty penny. That means your options are made-up words and phrases (YouTube) or deliberate misspellings (Digg). These names are hard for users to remember and type correctly into a browser.
Once you do find a name and launch a site, good luck getting the press to cover you. The modern public relations channel is broken. No one reads newspapers anymore, and they only cover “stories” anyway. Unless you have some big time founder or VC, you’re probably not a “story.” Blogs can give you some exposure, but their audiences are typically not big.
Offline advertising won’t help you with exposure. Don’t bother spending your money on billboards, TV ads, radio spots or print ads – none of them will grow your audience. People don’t migrate their attention from offline ads to online activity. Spending your money on this type of marketing is a well-beaten path to failure.
Online advertising won’t work much better. Banner ads suck – no one clicks on them. Search ads are great for one-off visitors (or if you’re actually selling something and then they’re an arbitrage play), but won’t convert to organic visits. You’re buying your visitors literally one at a time, and that’s no way to build an audience.
Search engine optimization is an option, but a limited one. Sure, you can likely scrounge together some visits and show some growth but you won’t build direct traffic or a direct audience through it. To make matters worse, even long-tail queries—think “daily vitamins for German Shepherds”—can be very competitive. Only Wikipedia has pulled off the trick of building a leading Web property through SEO, and they needed 2% of Google’s total traffic to do it.
If you are an established media company, your offline brand probably won’t translate into a large, ready-made online audience. The web is an entirely different medium, and old brands have lots of trouble translating. Just ask the newspapers and magazines how their online brands are doing.
Stealing the competition’s audience doesn’t work online. The two traditional ways of stealing market share – price competition and convenience – don't work. Media on the web is free and every site is literally one click away. Product is the only way to build an audience. And the product you build has to deliver a unique experience. And that’s no small feat.
If, in spite of all of these obstacles, you are successful in building an audience, here’s your reward: low monetization rates. Ad rates online are priced by CPMs (cost per thousand impressions). Your typical news or media site (i.e. not search or ecommerce) probably commands, on average, CPMs of a buck or two — site-wide. If the site is a social network, a forum page or other community offering, that number goes down to $0.15-$0.30. To make any real money, you need to serve A LOT of page views.
In other words, online is not for the faint of heart. It’s very far from an easy place to build an audience, much less make any real money. Ecommerce and search are the only really proven businesses online – and those have a whole host of other issues that go along with them.
So the next time you see some company build a site that grabs a big piece of the market and starts making real money, don’t dismiss its success as easy or lucky. Rather admire it for rising to the top in a very difficult environment.
体坛英语资讯:11 ministries join hands to combat doping
体坛英语资讯:Alonso and Hamilton wait on FIA hearings
体坛英语资讯:Ekstroem beats Schumacher in Wembley final
体坛英语资讯:Inter maintain lead with 2-0 win at Fiorentina
体坛英语资讯:Gonzalez stuns Federer in round-robin in Shanghai
体坛英语资讯:McGrady, Yao lead Rockets to win
体坛英语资讯:Yao, Yi shine in first matchup
体坛英语资讯:China sweeps womens top three at Xiamen marathon
体坛英语资讯:Diving champ marries pop singer
体坛英语资讯:Nadal reaches Shanghai semis with Ferrers help
体坛英语资讯:New Asian champion Pan returns to starting line
体坛英语资讯:McClaren: Successor will benefit from my flop
体坛英语资讯:Chang breaks with Peng but still wants to help China
体坛英语资讯:McClaren pays price for England Euro flop
体坛英语资讯:WR holder Du expects improvement in three positions
体坛英语资讯:Sampras upstages Federer in exhibition
体坛英语资讯:Pairs skaters challenged by system
体坛英语资讯:Mourinho is Terrys choice for England coach
体坛英语资讯:Totti denies considering Italy return
体坛英语资讯:French drive plus local nous to revive women
体坛英语资讯:CBA struggling to find TV audience
体坛英语资讯:England job will be my last - excited Capello
体坛英语资讯:Xinjiang stripped of CBA playoff spot
体坛英语资讯:Nadal the latest upset at Masters Cup
体坛英语资讯:Nothing guaranteed in group of death
体坛英语资讯:Federer wins clash of titans
美国和俄罗斯的关系从重启走向倒退
体坛英语资讯:Did Yi get an All-Star snub?
体坛英语资讯:Vintage Federer wins fourth Masters Cup
体坛英语资讯:Ferguson: Ronaldo victim of diving reputation
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |