Choking on Choice?
In America, people are faced with more and more decisions every day, whether its picking one of 31 ice cream flavors or deciding whether and when to get married. That sounds like a great thing. But as research from a Swarthmore College psychology professor has shown, too many choices can make us confused, unhappyeven paralyzed with indecision.
Thats particularly true when it comes to the workplace, says Barry Schwartz, an author of six books about human behavior. Students are graduating with a multitude of skills and interests, but often find themselves overwhelmed when it comes to choosing an ultimate career goal.
In a study, Schwartz observed decision-making among college students during their senior year. Based on answers to questions regarding their job-hunting strategies and career decisions, he divided the students into two groups: maximizers who consider every possible option, and satisficers who look until they find an option that is good enough.
You might expect that the students whod undertaken the most exhaustive search would be the most satisfied with their final decision. But it turns out thats not true. Schwartz found that while maximizers ended up with better paying jobs than satisficers on average, they werent as happy with their decision.
Why do these people feel less satisfied? Maybe because a world of possibilities is also a world of missed opportunities. When you look at every possible option you tend to fixate more on what was given up than what was gained. After surveying every option, a person is more acutely aware of the opportunity cost of their decision, or all the opportunities they had to turn down to pursue just one career.
So is it better to be a happy satisficer or a successful maximizer?
Some people may not be just one or the other; they may change their decision-making style to fit different situations. Columbia University business professor Sheena Iyengar, the studys co-author, thinks maximizing is only a problem if its a full-time strategy. People have to pick and choose what domains theyre going to maximize on, she says. There may be people out there who try to maximize on everything and, in the process, end up making decisions that dont satisfy what theyre looking for. These people will, literally, never be satisfied.
In Schwartzs view, its better to settle for good enough most of the time. Lower expectations and fewer regrets will make people who settle happier. He believes considering every option is almost never necessary, and should be reserved for the most important life decisions. Ultimately, its more important to maximize happiness than options.
争议画作终被鉴定为伦勃朗真迹
俄中破译斯诺登文件致英国撤回一线特工
总统家族? 布什亲弟弟宣布竞选美国总统
境外旅客内地购物正式享11%退税
中国造埃博拉药物挽救生命 却卷入专利纠纷
爱自拍的纽约警察成为网络红人
国际足联 你是如何摊上事儿的
也门各交战派系前往参加和平谈判
古巴电脑人才上网寻找美国客户
“付费国产剧”或明年试水
五大理由:苹果可能要造汽车
为世界打开一扇观察朝鲜的窗口
卷福当爸 爱妻生下“漂亮儿子”
充分享受生活,这些经历你有过多少?
传媒大亨默多克将辞去福克斯公司CEO职位
英国推“忠诚”订婚戒指
房地产投资放缓拖累中国经济增长
“暮光女”克里斯汀•斯图尔特宣布出柜!
人脸识别:双胞胎了没?
发展中国家面临经济结构性放缓
晒图:万磁王X教授亲上了!好基友一辈子
人民币或纳入“SDR货币篮子”
希腊与债权国谈判局面破裂
日行一万步真的有益健康吗?
宝宝一出生就该给他们iPad?
我国六年来首次全面晒公积金家底
洪水冲毁动物园 格鲁吉亚首都野兽横行
中国加大对南太平洋国家援助
成功并不只垂青女汉子
逆天设计:罗马剧场建到悉尼港了?
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |