原文:
Is the opinion of the majority-in government or in any other circumstances-a poor guide?
The entire idea of democracy centers around majority rule, where laws and standards are put into effect if most of the citizens support it. However, if people concentrate on only the majority in each circumstance, they often forget the voices and rights of the minorities. Simply because a person is in the minority of an opinion does not mean he can be ignored, for in a true democracy all the citizens are guaranteed the same rights. Thus in some circumstances strictly following the opinions of the majority is a poor guide to determining what actions to take.
The days before Americas Civil War, when slavery was prevalent, demonstrate that following majority rule often fails to respect peoples moral rights and liberty. The majority of white people in the early 1800s supported slavery because of the benefits they received from the suppressed blacks. Thus, the government reluctantly allowed slavery to be legal in America, despite the terrible sufferings of the slaves. The degraded slaves underwent uncountable terrifying experiences-they were beaten, separated from their families, and forced to toil laboriously in fields their entire lives. And because the government believed majority ruled,the slaves lived in such conditions until the Emancipation Proclamation was written during the bloody Civil War. Had the government not followed the opinions of the clamoring whites, slavery could have been abolished much sooner, and much suffering could have been avoided. Thus, in this circumstance of freedom vs. suppression, the opinion of the majority served as a poor guide to follow by the U.S. government.
Furthermore, the effects of majority rule impact Americans today, for there are many unsolved, controversial issues such as abortion, stem-cell research, and homosexual marriages. In the case of gay rights, the majority of Americans oppose people of the same sex marrying, and most of the states laws reflect this opinion. However, ignoring the wishes of gays and lesbians by enacting these laws will leave many of them unhappy because they cannot legally tie the knot with the person they love. The U.S. Constitution declares that everyone has the right to pursue happiness, but by banning gay marriages, some may be barred from the happiness of marriage. In addition, many oppose stem?cell research because they are angered by the fact that embryos are created and then destroyed. Once again, though, if the government passes a law banning such research, the minority may suffer. Stem?cell research may save lives by using the cells to specialize in a certain area. Those who would benefit from the discoveries of stem?cell research may die
一道非常容易出错的定语从句考题
关系副词引导的定语从句
关系代词引导的定语从句
关系代词that 的用法
如何快速区别非限制性定语从句与并列句
in which case的用法
at which point的用法
though/although习惯上不与but连用吗
that还是when
whose引导定语从句可以指物吗
这道题中的as是关系代词
as, which 非限定性定语从句
用作从属连词的六类名词结构
英语紧缩定语从句用法说明
时间或地点名词后一定要用where, when来引导定语从句吗
也谈that和which的用法区别
使用关系副词的三点注意
of whom / which引导的定语从句
It’s time后接定语从句的几点用法说明
关系代词作定语的定语从句
是around which还是around where
做题时当心定语从句的干扰
介词+关系词
是none of them还是none of which
考查above which的一道高考题
能用what引导定语从句吗
place后接定语(从句)的特殊性
the way后可接how引导的定语从句吗
限制性和非限制性定语从句
关系词代词和关系副词的意义与用法
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |