原文:
Is the opinion of the majority-in government or in any other circumstances-a poor guide?
The entire idea of democracy centers around majority rule, where laws and standards are put into effect if most of the citizens support it. However, if people concentrate on only the majority in each circumstance, they often forget the voices and rights of the minorities. Simply because a person is in the minority of an opinion does not mean he can be ignored, for in a true democracy all the citizens are guaranteed the same rights. Thus in some circumstances strictly following the opinions of the majority is a poor guide to determining what actions to take.
The days before Americas Civil War, when slavery was prevalent, demonstrate that following majority rule often fails to respect peoples moral rights and liberty. The majority of white people in the early 1800s supported slavery because of the benefits they received from the suppressed blacks. Thus, the government reluctantly allowed slavery to be legal in America, despite the terrible sufferings of the slaves. The degraded slaves underwent uncountable terrifying experiences-they were beaten, separated from their families, and forced to toil laboriously in fields their entire lives. And because the government believed majority ruled,the slaves lived in such conditions until the Emancipation Proclamation was written during the bloody Civil War. Had the government not followed the opinions of the clamoring whites, slavery could have been abolished much sooner, and much suffering could have been avoided. Thus, in this circumstance of freedom vs. suppression, the opinion of the majority served as a poor guide to follow by the U.S. government.
Furthermore, the effects of majority rule impact Americans today, for there are many unsolved, controversial issues such as abortion, stem-cell research, and homosexual marriages. In the case of gay rights, the majority of Americans oppose people of the same sex marrying, and most of the states laws reflect this opinion. However, ignoring the wishes of gays and lesbians by enacting these laws will leave many of them unhappy because they cannot legally tie the knot with the person they love. The U.S. Constitution declares that everyone has the right to pursue happiness, but by banning gay marriages, some may be barred from the happiness of marriage. In addition, many oppose stem?cell research because they are angered by the fact that embryos are created and then destroyed. Once again, though, if the government passes a law banning such research, the minority may suffer. Stem?cell research may save lives by using the cells to specialize in a certain area. Those who would benefit from the discoveries of stem?cell research may die
GMAT写作考试如何提高速度
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文十九
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文十五
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文二十
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文二十
GMAT写作辅导:109题Argument范文(二十四)
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文七八
GMAT近年来新增作文题目
GMAT写作辅导:109题Argument范文(二十八)
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文六五
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文二四
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文十八
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文七四
GMAT作文Argument范文
GMAT写作辅导:109题Argument范文(二十三)
名师点津:如何提高写作能力
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文六一
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文三
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文六六
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文十三
GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文二五
GMAT写作辅导:109题Argument范文(二十一)
GMAT ISSUE写作高频话题:员工激励的作用
GMAT新黄金80题及范文(三)
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文六
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文三二
近期GMAT作文考题汇编一
2007近期GMAT作文考题汇编二
GMAT写作考试中43个常见话题总结
GMAT写作辅导:109题Argument范文(二十七)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |