我们今天来介绍一下SAT写作的评分标准,SAT写作是由两个人独立评分,1~6分,也就是你最后的得分在2~12分之间。关于写作,SAT的写作没有题库,但是据说和GRE的题库差不太多,就是没有GRE那么深。SAT的写作要求是纯粹的学术写作,提出观点、提出支持观点的论点、提出论据、最后总结。视题目的要求,可能会需要一个让步段。一般5段式为好。
下面是SAT写作的评分标准,全英文的:
SCORE OF 6
An essay in this category is outstanding, demonstrating clear and consistent mastery, although it may have a few minor errors. A typical essay
effectively and insightfully develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates outstanding critical thinking, using clearly appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
is well organized and clearly focused, demonstrating clear coherence and smooth progression of ideas
exhibits skillful use of language, using a varied, accurate, and apt vocabulary
demonstrates meaningful variety in sentence structure
is free of most errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
SCORE OF 5
An essay in this category is effective, demonstrating resonably consistent mastery, although it will have occasional errors or lapses in quality. A typical essay
effectively develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates strong critical thinking, generally using appropriate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
is well organized and focused, demonstrating coherence and progression of ideas
exhibits facility in the use of language, using appropriate vocabulary
demonstrates variety in sentence structure
is generally free of most errors in grammar, usage and mechanics
SCORE OF 4
An essay in this category is competent, demonstrating adequate mastery, although it will have lapses in quality. A typical essay
develops a point of view on the issue and demonstrates competent critical thinking, using adequate examples, reasons, and other evidence to support its position
is generally organized and forcused, demonstrating some coherence and progression of ideas
exhibits adequate but inconsistent facility in the use of language, using generally appropriate vocabulary
demonstrates some variety in sentence structure
has some errors in grammar, usage and mechanics
SCORE OF 3
An essay in this category is inadequate, but demonstrates developing mastery, and is marked by one or more of the following weaknesses
develops a point of view on the issue, demonstrating some critical thinking, but may do so inconsistently or use inadequate examples, reasons, or other evidence to support its position 分页标题#e#
is limited in its organization or focus, but may demonstrate some lapses in coherence or progression of ideas
displays developing facility in the use of language, but sometimes uses weak vocabulary or inappropriate word choice
lacks variety or demonstrates problems in sentence structure
contains an accumulation of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics
SCORE OF 2
An essay in this category is seriously limited, demonstrating little mastery, and is flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses
develops a point of view on the issue that is vague or seriously limited, demonstrating weak critical thinking, providing inappropriate or insufficient examples, reasons, or other evidence to support its position
is poorly organized and/or focused, or demonstrates serious problems with coherence or progreesion of ideas
displays very little facility in the use of language, using very limited vocabulary or incorrect word choice
demonstrates frequent problems in sentence structure
contains errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics so serious that meaning is somewhat obscured
SCORE OF 1
An essay in this category is fundamentally lacking, demonstrating very little or no mastery, and is severely flawed by one or more of the following weaknesses:
develops no viable point of view on the issue, or provides little or no evidence to support its position
is disorganized or unfocused, resulting in a disjointed or incoherent essay
displays fundamental errors in vocabulary
demonstrates severe flaws in sentence structure
contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that peresistently interfere with meaning
SCORE OF 0
Essays not written on the essay assignment will receive a score of zero
以上就是SAT写作的评分标准,由此可见,要写一篇好的文章要做到逻辑清晰,观点明确,词汇丰富,句子多样,语法上没有大问题才可以。
国内英语资讯:China pledges to deepen cooperation with WIPO
国内英语资讯:Lawmakers mull regulation to protect memorial ceremony for Nanjing Massacre victims
客机越飞越慢?航企为规避赔偿,对航班时间进行“增肥”
国际英语资讯:French President Macron calls for stronger Danish commitment on EU defense
美国一家企业推出共享保姆服务
国际英语资讯:Intl humanitarian appeal for Rohingya crisis significantly underfunded: UN chief
睡眠不足还能导致发胖?
国际英语资讯:Mattis says no plans to suspend more military exercises with S. Korea
国际英语资讯:Myanmars highway temporarily closed due to collapse of dam spillway
国际英语资讯:Reshuffled Greek cabinet sworn in
体坛英语资讯:Lee Harry Erwin joins Iranian side Tractor Sazi
Education System 教育体系
研究人员研发出可以改变味道的电子筷子
国际英语资讯:China Harbour builds new terminal south of Egypts Suez Canal
Teenager’s argument with parents 青少年和父母的争吵
体坛英语资讯:Hu Mingxuans decisive three helps China Team Blue beat Finland 87-84 in overtime
国内英语资讯:Senior official stresses IPR protection to promote innovative development
体坛英语资讯:Ronaldinhos son to play with Cruzeiro youth team
国内英语资讯:Premier Li calls on Chinese, Japanese young people to deepen mutual trust
国内英语资讯:Chinese lawmakers voice support for amendment to criminal procedure law
国际英语资讯:Japans defense white paper hypes up regional threat
国内英语资讯:Xinhua Headlines: Chinas private businesses gain momentum amid challenges
国内英语资讯:FOCAC effective to boost China-Africa cooperation: envoy
夏洛特小公主的爱好是什么?竟然和女王一样...
My View on Private Car 论私家车
Is the Twitter Assignment Good or Bad? 推特作业好还是不好?
体坛英语资讯:Zhao Ruis 18 points help China Team Red beat Croatia 81-69
国内英语资讯:Chinas top legislator listens to advice on improving lawmakers role
体坛英语资讯:Russian international Denis Cheryshev joins Valencia
职场饼干文化:独享惹人厌 分享更快乐
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |