这是一篇关于SAT Essay题目popular culture的延伸讨论
From the November 2009 SAT, defines popular culture broadly:
Popular culture refers to television shows, movies, books, musical selections, artworks, products, activities, and events that appeal to the interests and desires of large numbers of people. Popular culture tells us a lot about the people of a society. Some people may criticize popular culture or deny its influence on their lives, but one thing is clear: popular culture typically displays the ideas and principles that people value most.
Are the values of a society most clearly revealed in its popular culture?
This SAT prompt, from October 2005, seems to almost foresee the rise of Hollywood-fueled Twitter feeds:
1. Celebrities have the power to attract communities of like-minded followers; they provide an identity that people can connect to and call their own. Celebrities are trusted; they stand for certain ideas and values to which followers can express allegiance.Adapted from William Greider, Who Will Tell the People?
2. Admiration for celebrities is often accompanied by contempt for average people. As we focus on the famous, other people become less important to us. The world becomes populated with a few somebodies and an excess of near-nobodies.
Adapted from Norman Solomon and Jeff Cohen, Wizards of Media Oz
Is societys admiration for famous people beneficial or harmful?
Here, from December 2006, is an SAT prompt on media and reality that could be a companion to the more recent TV-show prompt:
All around us appearances are mistaken for reality. Clever advertisements create favorable impressions but say little or nothing about the products they promote. In stores, colorful packages are often better than their contents. In the media, how certain entertainers, politicians, and other public figures appear is more important than their abilities. All too often, what we think we see becomes far more important than what really is.
Do images and impressions have too much of an effect on people?
And then, in October 2009, SAT-takers were asked to opine on the state of the news:
Good news is, for the most part, no news. It is not sufficiently compelling or important to make leading stories and front pages in the media, certainly not as often as bad news. Bad news sells, or so it seems from the books, newspapers, and television reports that fill our lives. But in this endless focus on the bad, the media present a distorted view of the world.
Adapted from Richard B. McKenzie, The Paradox of Progress: Can Americans Regain Their Confidence in a Prosperous Future?
Do books, newspapers, and other media focus too much on bad news?
Finally, that same month, other takers of the SAT were asked about something near and dear to many, but perhaps not all: their cellphones:
An Internet phone service is offering unlimited free telephone calls for anyone who signs up. There is only one catch: the company will use software to listen to customers phone conversations and then send customers advertisements based on what they have been talking about. For example, if they talk about movies with their friends, advertisements for movies will appear on their computer screens. Commentators have voiced concern about customers giving up their privacy in exchange for phone service.
Should people give up their privacy in exchange for convenience or free services?
And here, at last, is the one, similar prompt that administrators of the ACT gave to us:
As the amount of time students spend watching television increases, teachers debate whether television channels should be required to devote at least 20 percent of their programming to educational shows about topics such as science and history.
Some teachers support this policy because they think television is an ideal teaching instrument with a very large and very receptive audience. Other teachers do not support this policy because they think what is considered educational by some could be considered merely entertaining by others.
In your opinion, should television channels be required to devote at least 20 percent of their programming to educational shows?
In your essay, take a position on this question. You may write about either one of the two points of view given, or you may present a different point of view on this question. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.
玛丽亚凯莉带孕大秀59美元平价钻戒
北京奥运村迎来首批“村民”
双语:天桥骄子主持客串绯闻女孩第四季
双语:英国“最大狗”新鲜出炉
最新研究挑战传统:男生学理科未必有优势
诗词英译:沉醉东风-秋日湘阴道中
美国人视角:享受奥运,向中国学习
360度看伦敦 世界最清晰全景图出炉
英国全民打赌:谁为准王妃凯特做嫁衣
谷歌街景拍到有人街头生孩子 旁边医院毫不知情
奥运前夕中国加紧空气治理
牛津字典收录微博词汇 网络用语受宠
机器人沉睡45年后重见天日
北京奥运主题歌《我和你》传递温暖
台湾学生数学成绩全球排名第一
美国人喜好调查:最爱披头士最恨慢车
网通电信宣布:台湾地震受损电缆恢复运作
双语:未来“台湾塔”
百万张奥运门票发放全国中小学
双语:《绝望主妇》第七季被爆有新主妇加入
奥运给北京树起新地标
大小贾斯汀共享“恋爱秘籍”:冷静承诺
英皇后人选引热议 卡梅伦力挺卡米拉
研究发现:人类大脑无法判断对方性别
捷克男主持效仿Lady Gaga穿鲜肉装
罗格北京奥运会开幕式致辞全文
双语资讯:台湾外海发生6.6级地震
双语:中国人均寿命增速有点慢
阿凡达发光树或成真 未来可代替路灯
双语欣赏:温总理诗作《仰望星空》
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |