Is the opinion of the majority-in government or in any other circumstances-a poor guide?
The entire idea of democracy centers around majority rule, where laws and standards are put into effect if most of the citizens support it. However, if people concentrate on only the majority in each circumstance, they often forget the voices and rights of the minorities. Simply because a person is in the minority of an opinion does not mean he can be ignored, for in a true democracy all the citizens are guaranteed the same rights. Thus in some circumstances strictly following the opinions of the majority is a poor guide to determining what actions to take.
The days before Americas Civil War, when slavery was prevalent, demonstrate that following majority rule often fails to respect peoples moral rights and liberty. The majority of white people in the early 1800s supported slavery because of the benefits they received from the suppressed blacks. Thus, the government reluctantly allowed slavery to be legal in America, despite the terrible sufferings of the slaves. The degraded slaves underwent uncountable terrifying experiences-they were beaten, separated from their families, and forced to toil laboriously in fields their entire lives. And because the government believed majority ruled,the slaves lived in such conditions until the Emancipation Proclamation was written during the bloody Civil War. Had the government not followed the opinions of the clamoring whites, slavery could have been abolished much sooner, and much suffering could have been avoided. Thus, in this circumstance of freedom vs. suppression, the opinion of the majority served as a poor guide to follow by the U.S. government.
Furthermore, the effects of majority rule impact Americans today, for there are many unsolved, controversial issues such as abortion, stem-cell research, and homosexual marriages. In the case of gay rights, the majority of Americans oppose people of the same sex marrying, and most of the states laws reflect this opinion. However, ignoring the wishes of gays and lesbians by enacting these laws will leave many of them unhappy because they cannot legally tie the knot with the person they love. The U.S. Constitution declares that everyone has the right to pursue happiness, but by banning gay marriages, some may be barred from the happiness of marriage. In addition, many oppose stem?cell research because they are angered by the fact that embryos are created and then destroyed. Once again, though, if the government passes a law banning such research, the minority may suffer. Stem?cell research may save lives by using the cells to specialize in a certain area. Those who would benefit from the discoveries of stem?cell research may die
中国考生为何对GRE高频作文情有独钟?
GRE中Argue写作技巧:开头结尾及文段指导
GRE写作中常出现的问题及解决方案!
GRE写作必备能力:逻辑能力+思维发散能力
真正理解GRE写作仿写的意义:练习+提高
GRE写作提纲举例指导(10)
GRE作文高分重点:文章新意
短期内快速提高GRE作文成绩 模板很关键
GRE写作提纲举例指导(9)
GRE ISSUE思路解析和举例、词组(一)
GRE写作关键:英语运用和表达能力
GRE写作提纲举例指导(1)
如何重击GRE写作的四大困扰?
如何写GRE话题作文?
GRE写作提纲举例指导(5)
GRE写作:远离“中国式思维”
GRE写作复习必备:写作素材
GRE写作:学习类的话题参考
GRE写作模板和提纲哪个更“靠谱”?
GRE写作技巧:类比方法
GRE作文issue备考:写作举例精讲
GRE写作提纲举例指导(2)
GRE写作:issue作文常见问题及解决方式
GRE写作话题总结之科技
GRE写作提纲举例指导(18)
GRE作文评分标准问题全解答!
GRE写作提纲举例指导(7)
GRE写作提纲举例指导(11)
满分GRE作文模板经典展示
GRE作文Argue写作指导全方略
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |