People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does.
The speaker asserts that because teamwork requires cooperative effort, people are more motivated and therefore more productive working in teams than working individually as competitors. My view is that this assertion is true only in some cases. If one examines the business world, for example, it becomes clear that which approach is more effective in motivating people and in achieving productivity depends on the specific job.
In some jobs productivity dearly depends on the ability of coworkers to cooperate as members of a team. For businesses involved in the production of products through complex processes, all departments and divisions must work in lock-step fashion toward product roll-out. Cooperative interaction is even essential in jobs performed in relative isolation and in jobs in which technical knowledge or ability, not the ability to work with others, would seem to be most important. For example, scientists, researchers, and even computer programmers must collaborate to establish common goals, coordinate efforts, and meet time lines. Moreover, the kinds of people attracted to these jobs in the first place are likely to be motivated by a sense of common purpose rather than by individual ambition.
In other types of jobs individual competition, tenacity, and ambition are the keys to productivity. For example, a commissioned salespersons compensation, and sometimes tenure and potential for promotion as well, is based on comparative sales performance of coworkers. Working as competitors a firms individual salespeople maximize productivity-in terms of profit--both for themselves and for their finn. Key leadership positions also call, above all, for a certain tenacity and competitive spirit. A finns founding entrepreneur must maintain this spirit in order for the firm to survive, let alone to maximize productivity. Moreover, in my observation the kinds of people inclined toward entrepreneurship and sales in the first place are those who are competitive by nature, not those who are motivated primarily by a sense of common purpose.
On balance, however, my view is that cooperation is more crucial for an organizations long-term productivity than individual competition. Even in jobs where individual competitiveness is part-and-parcel of the job, the importance of cooperation should not be underestimated. Competition among sales people can quickly grow into jealousy, back stabbing, and unethical behavior all of which are counterproductive. And even the most successful entrepreneurs would no doubt admit that without the cooperative efforts of their subordinates, partners, and colleagues, their personal visions would never become reality.
In sum, individual competitiveness and ambition are essential motivating forces for certain types of jobs, while in other jobs it is a common sense of mission that motivates workers to achieve maximum productivity. In the final analysis, however, the overall productivity of almost every organization depends ultimately on the ability of its members to cooperate as a team.
2016届上海市高三英语一模——十选九
肯德基与百度合作 在北京推出智能点餐门店
江苏省盐城中学2016届高三英语周末回顾(8) Word版含答案
乘坐地铁自动扶梯靠右站究竟安全不安全?
2016年高考第二轮复习英语专题(浙江版)升级训练卷九完形填空(一)(附答案)
2016年高考第二轮复习英语(全国版)专题整合突破五动词和动词短语
调查权力法案生效,将英国公民置于严密监视之下
亚马逊数据显示 滑雪消费南方不输北方
双语笑话 第386期: 新型超级恶棍
无人机行业能否安全起飞
信息技术与新型全球化
2016届广东潮阳实验学校高考英语冲刺练习(12)
2016届上海市高三英语一模——选标题
2016届广东潮阳实验学校高考英语冲刺练习(10)
第74届金球奖:梅姨火力全开抨击川普
2016年高考第二轮复习英语专题(浙江版)升级训练卷五非谓语动词(附答案)
2016年高考英语冲刺抢分训练集1
2016届广东潮阳实验学校高考英语冲刺练习(2)
2016年高考第二轮复习英语(全国版)题型技法指导专题03 阅读理解
2016年高考英语冲刺抢分训练集4
江苏省盐城中学2016届高三英语周末回顾(6) Word版含答案
2016年高考英语冲刺抢分训练集16
江苏省盐城中学2016届高三英语周末回顾(7) Word版含答案
江苏省盐城中学2016届高三英语周末回顾(2) Word版含答案
2016年高考英语冲刺抢分训练集5
中国官员扬言将反击特朗普新关税
普京“下令”采取措施,为击垮美国选举信任并帮助特朗普
2016年高考第二轮复习英语专题(浙江版)一名词冠词和主谓一致
2016年高考第二轮复习英语专题(浙江版)升级训练卷六并列句和复合句(附答案)
2016年高考第二轮复习英语(陕西版)题型技法指导专题08 短文改错
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |