Essay Response Score 3
There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. For example, the problem of dibilitating illnesses and diseases such as alzheimers disease is slowing being solved by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing new brain cells and the possibility to reverse the onset of alzheimers is now becoming a reality. This shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think.
One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds is the use of internet and cell phones. In the past humans had to seek out information in many different enviroments and aspects of life. Now humans can sit in a chair and type anything into a computer and get an answer. Our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularily substituted for other information sources such as human interactions and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.
Reader Commentary for Essay Response Score 3
This essay never moves beyond a superficial discussion of the issue. The writer attempts to develop two points: that advancements in technology have progressed our knowledge in many fields and that supplementing rather than relying on technology is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race. Each point, then, is developed with relevant but insufficient evidence. In discussing the potential of technology to advance knowledge in many fields , the writer uses only one limited and very brief example from a specific field .
Development of the second point is hindered by a lack of specificity and organization. The writer creates what might be best described as an outline. The writer cites a need for regulation/supplementation and warns of the detriment of over-reliance upon technology. However, the explanation of both the problem and solution is vague and limited . There is neither explanation of consequences nor clarification of what is meant by supplementing. This second paragraph is a series of generalizations that are loosely connected and lack a much-needed grounding.
In the essay, there are some minor language errors and a few more serious flaws . Despite the accumulation of such flaws, the writers meaning is generally clear. Thus, this essay earns a score of 3.
SAT阅读考试四大备考重点
SAT小说类文章阅读技巧
如何提高SAT文章阅读速度?
SAT填空题高频词汇与答题技巧
如何分析SAT阅读的题干和选项?
SAT阅读文章练习:Weddell seal
如何解决SAT阅读"读不懂"问题
SAT阅读高分攻略:抓住文章核心思想
理解SAT阅读文章的三个方法
SAT填空题答题过程解析
SAT填空题的解答方式分类
SAT阅读生词的破解方法
SAT填空题4个高分做题原则
SAT文章阅读中的三类重点题目
SAT阅读8道填空练习题精选
SAT填空题出题方式介绍
备考SAT填空题的三大方向
SAT文章阅读修辞手法举例
SAT填空:七大逻辑关系总结
SAT填空题答题的两个注意事项
四种SAT文章阅读的常见题型介绍
SAT填空题所需的6类逻辑性词汇
SAT阅读高分技巧:突破三大难点
SAT阅读考试高分宝典
SAT填空题是如何考察逻辑关系的
SAT阅读常见技巧之排除法
攻克SAT阅读五阶段
SAT阅读三大出题方法
如何分析SAT文章阅读的题目?
如何理清SAT阅读文章结构?
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |