编辑点评: GRE写作的复习离不开逻辑思维的锻炼、内容框架的建构、词汇的积累等,这些大家都可以通过研究范文来实现,本文为大家分析的是The end of the free lunch,大家不妨来学习一下。
本文为大家例举了GRE作文中的范文,希望大家可以从文章和分析中收获不错的GRE写作的方法。
The demise of a popular but unsustainable business model now seems inevitable.
IN RECENT years, consumers have become used to feasting on online freebies of all sorts: news, share quotes, music, e-mail and even speedy internet access. These days, however, dotcoms are not making news with yet more free offerings, but with lay-offs and with announcements that they are to start charging for their services. These words appeared in The Economist in April 2001, but they re just as applicable today. During the dotcom boom, the idea got about that there could be such a thing as a free lunch, or at least free internet services. Firms sprang upto offer content and services online, in the hope that they would eventually be able to monetise the resulting millions of eyeballs by selling advertising. Things did not work out that way, though, and the result was the dotcom crash. Companies tried other business models, such as charging customers for access, but very few succeeded in getting people to pay up.
Then it happened all over again, starting in 2004 with the listing of Google on the stockmarket, which inflated a new Web 2.0 bubble. Google s ability to place small, targeted text advertisements next to internet-search results, and on other websites, meant that many of the business models thought to have been killed by the dotcom bust now rose from the grave. It seemed there was indeed money to be made from internet advertising, provided you could target it accurately a problem that could be conveniently outsourced to Google. The only reason it had not worked the first time around, it was generally agreed, was a shortage of broadband connections. The pursuit of eyeballs began again, and a series of new internet stars emerged: MySpace, YouTube, Facebook and now Twitter. Each provided a free service in order to attract a large audience that would then at some unspecified point in the future attract large amounts of advertising revenue. It had worked for Google, after all. The free lunch was back.
Now reality is reasserting itself once more, with familiar results. The number of companies that can be sustained by revenues from internet advertising turns out to be much smaller than many people thought, and Silicon Valley seems to be entering another nuclear winter .
Internet companies are again laying people off, scaling back, shutting down, trying to sell themselves to deep-pocketed industry giants, or talking of charging for their content or services. Some Web 2.0 darlings managed to find buyers before the bubble burst, thus passing the problem of finding a profitable business model to someone else . But quite how Facebook or Twitter will be able to make enough money to keep the lights on for their millions of users remains unclear. Facebook has had several stabs at a solution, most recently with a scheme called Facebook Connect. Twitter s founders had planned to forget about revenues until 2010, but the site now seems to be preparing for the inclusion of advertising.
The bill, sir
The idea that you can give things away online, and hope that advertising revenue will somehow materialise later on, undoubtedly appeals to users, who enjoy free services as a result. There is business logic to it, too. The nature of the internet means that the barrier to entry for new companies is very low indeed, thanks to technological improvements, it is even lower in the Web 2.0 era than it was in the dotcom era. The internet also allows companies to exploit network effects to attract and retain users very quickly and cheaply. So it is not surprising that rival search engines, social networks or video-sharing sites give their services away in order to attract users, and put the difficult question of how to make money to one side. If you worry too much about a revenue model early on, you risk being left behind.
Ultimately, though, every business needs revenues and advertising, it transpires, is not going to provide enough. Free content and services were a beguiling idea. But the lesson of two internet bubbles is that somebody somewhere is going to have to pick up the tab for lunch.
补摹写类~
1、not yet.....but...
It s strange that our boss not yet punished them but made a rise in their salary
2、连着用动名词的那句~
The students are again ,after the examination, complaining about lack of time, regreting their inattention or checking answers with others in fear and trembling.
大家不妨模仿这篇文章,来进行练习。
英语讲义【127】名词惯用语
英语讲义【104】中英词序不同
英语讲义【92】含on的三字一体片语动词
英语讲义【84】助动词与情态动词
英语讲义【71】名词修饰语㈠
英语讲义【109】及物动词不需要介词
英语讲义【98】以IT为宾语的句型
英语讲义【120】与五官相关的惯用语
英语讲义【116】名词句型的优点
英语讲义【128】名词修饰动词
英语讲义【82】修饰语位置错误
英语讲义【115】三合一动词组及副词组
英语讲义【118】Be+不定式动词
英语讲义【108】由take引导的动词短语
英语讲义【86】形容词句型
英语讲义【102】不以进行式时态出现的动词
英语讲义【123】只有其意,不见其形
英语讲义【87】动词形态的误用
英语讲义【96】由have引导的动词短语
英语讲义【72】名词修饰语㈡
英语讲义【69】句子的类别
英语讲义【91】混淆的动词形态
英语讲义【144】效益良好的句法
英语讲义【100】词序不同,句义有异
英语讲义【106】由put引导的动词短语
英语讲义【131】由“形容词或分词+名词”组成的名词惯用语
英语讲义【114】三合一名词组及形容词组
英语讲义【94】句子结构不当
英语讲义【122】以动名词为宾语的动词句型
英语讲义【68】英语惯用语的简化
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |