编辑点评: 研习GRE作文考试的优秀范文不仅可以学到有用的词汇和句子,更能从中学习逻辑的构建方式和作文框架的结构等内容,这里为大家提供GRE的范文,希望对同学们的备考有所帮助。
We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
通常,我们从与我们意见相同的人身上学到的要比从那些与我们意见相悖的人身上学的东西要多得多;意见不统一会带来压力并且阻碍学习。
正文:
From people whose views we share we get confidence, encouragement, and psychological satisfaction; from people whose views contradict our own we get new angles, fresh perspectives, and pertinent advices. But excessive agreements would lead us to the morass of self-complacence; and extreme contradictions would weaken our determination of learning. Thus we should fully recognize the potential danger of limiting our vision in one of the two sides. And only through the approach of paying equal attention to both sides could we make further achievements in the process of learning.
Views and ideas from people agree with us may raise our confidence, strengthen our courage, and enhance our psychological satisfaction. According to common sense and our everyday experience, the propensity to accept the ideas from people who agree with us rather than the opinions from people disagree with us associates strongly with the nature of human beings, for we are social animals and it is the inner instinct of us to seek for approval of others. Imagine, what would you react if the work accomplished by your arduous efforts receives fierce criticism or not even a glance? You would lose your strength to march in the long road of learning.
On the contrary, agreements may cause the feeling of being accepted and consented, thus we gain the psychological satisfaction which will impulse us to learn more. Moreover, customarily, we tend to imitate and share ideas and behaviors from our parents, friends, classmates and so forth, who are in the same group of ours. By this way we form knowledge of our own. Not under all circumstances we can learn from people whose views we share. Only base on the premises that all the views of our assenters are authentic and sincere, however, could we learn useful knowledge from them. On condition that people consent and even flatter us for certain purposes which have nothing to do with learning, our learning would be hindered instead of motivated. We would be possessed in the illusive pride and limited in a narrow bound of vision. Consequently, we can see that the speaker s assertion is incomplete and oversimplified.
Contradicting views and ideas could aware us of the mistakes and flaws in our work which we can not discover by ourselves, bring us fresh angles and perspectives, and then make our work mature and complete. Thereby through the discussion and competition both we and the people disagree with us could make advancements in our learning. Debate on the same subject make it possible for human beings to make most of the achievements and advances on fields of science, technology, philosophy and the like. If we see only on the one side of the coin, we could get only a partial and distorted knowledge and view which might mislead our learning.
Also, contradiction may cause negative effects under certain conditions, especially when the debate becomes irrational denouncement or personal attack. Then our confidence would be impaired by the criticisms and our learning inhibited by the stress excessive contradictions brings us. Disagreements would be detrimental rather than beneficial to our learning under this circumstance.
Bias on each of the two sides is detrimental to our learning for that agreements and disagreements form a organic entity which can not be absolutely divided. Over reliance on one side is blind and unwise. Agreements base on no evidence are actually flatters; disagreements without rational reasons are reprimands. We would be enmeshed in the web of self-contention sewed by ourselves and could not go ahead if we and blinded by the flatters; we would be frozen in the chilly night of darkness created by reprimands and became helpless and hopeless. We must pay equal attentions on both sides to see the whole picture.
To sum up, ideas of people whose views we share and people whose views contradict our own play their respective role in our learning, and none of them should be neglected. Therefore, balance between both sides is needed. And only through this way could we achieve the further goal in our process of learning.
以上就是关于意见同与不同的GRE写作范文,考生可以认真阅读,只要我们平日里认真复习了,一点一滴地积累和总结,基本都能考到4.5分以上。扎实的练习加上新GRE写作范文模仿再加上临危不惧的心态,相信大家一定能够取得不错的成绩。
时事资讯:发手机短信会让孩子变笨?
时事资讯:美国企业能主导经济复苏吗?
时事资讯:国庆60周年庆典将采取人工消雨
时事资讯:台风凯萨娜袭击越南 至少23人死亡
时事资讯:中国率先购买500亿美元IMF债券
时事资讯:第一届迪士尼粉丝大会幕后花絮
时事资讯:中国坚持对从欧盟进口猪肉实施新规定
时事资讯:巧克力曲奇女王的创业故事
时事资讯:鸠山由纪夫主张建立东亚共同体
时事资讯:吉利在沃尔沃竞购赛中领先
川普淡化教宗对其移民政策的批评
时事资讯:制造业好转显示全球经济开始复苏
时事资讯:奥巴马:美中将"塑造21世纪"
韩国关闭开城工业园受质疑
时事资讯:微软、雅虎交易面临反垄断战?
时事资讯:美国经济回升缓慢导致美元下跌
时事资讯:多久跳一下槽比较合适?
时事资讯:社交网站好友申请爆棚 盖茨无奈退出
时事资讯:雅虎错失良机
时事资讯:比亚迪敦促政府为环保汽车提供补贴
时事资讯:Verisk将进行美国年度规模最大IPO
时事资讯:高盛交易业务秘密会议受调查
沙特与俄罗斯同意冻结石油产量
时事资讯:意总理"有染"应召女郎获盛邀出席巴黎派对
苹果拒为FBI解锁圣贝纳迪诺枪击案凶手iPhone
教皇与特朗普围绕筑墙对撕
时事资讯:美国经济已对刺激计划上瘾
兹卡病毒或可增加精神疾病风险
时事资讯:耶鲁学生死因查明 一名技工接受调查
时事资讯:高盛将向吉利汽车投资2.5亿美元
不限 |