People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does.
The speaker asserts that because teamwork requires cooperative effort, people are more motivated and therefore more productive working in teams than working individually as competitors. My view is that this assertion is true only in some cases. If one examines the business world, for example, it becomes clear that which approach is more effective in motivating people and in achieving productivity depends on the specific job.
In some jobs productivity dearly depends on the ability of coworkers to cooperate as members of a team. For businesses involved in the production of products through complex processes, all departments and divisions must work in lock-step fashion toward product roll-out. Cooperative interaction is even essential in jobs performed in relative isolation and in jobs in which technical knowledge or ability, not the ability to work with others, would seem to be most important. For example, scientists, researchers, and even computer programmers must collaborate to establish common goals, coordinate efforts, and meet time lines. Moreover, the kinds of people attracted to these jobs in the first place are likely to be motivated by a sense of common purpose rather than by individual ambition.
In other types of jobs individual competition, tenacity, and ambition are the keys to productivity. For example, a commissioned salespersons compensation, and sometimes tenure and potential for promotion as well, is based on comparative sales performance of coworkers. Working as competitors a firms individual salespeople maximize productivity-in terms of profit--both for themselves and for their finn. Key leadership positions also call, above all, for a certain tenacity and competitive spirit. A finns founding entrepreneur must maintain this spirit in order for the firm to survive, let alone to maximize productivity. Moreover, in my observation the kinds of people inclined toward entrepreneurship and sales in the first place are those who are competitive by nature, not those who are motivated primarily by a sense of common purpose.
On balance, however, my view is that cooperation is more crucial for an organizations long-term productivity than individual competition. Even in jobs where individual competitiveness is part-and-parcel of the job, the importance of cooperation should not be underestimated. Competition among sales people can quickly grow into jealousy, back stabbing, and unethical behavior all of which are counterproductive. And even the most successful entrepreneurs would no doubt admit that without the cooperative efforts of their subordinates, partners, and colleagues, their personal visions would never become reality.
In sum, individual competitiveness and ambition are essential motivating forces for certain types of jobs, while in other jobs it is a common sense of mission that motivates workers to achieve maximum productivity. In the final analysis, however, the overall productivity of almost every organization depends ultimately on the ability of its members to cooperate as a team.
高一英语下册unit18 New Zealand reading课件
外研版初一英语上册学案Module9 Unit1 Vocabulary and listening
北京西城区2010年中考二模英语试题及答案
牛津版高三英语module9 unit3 grammar课件2
2011年中考英语模拟试卷(冀教版)
外研版七年级英语上册教案Module10 Unit1
高二英语4月份月考试题及答案
牛津小学一年级英语上册听力课件1A-Unit4
2011年中考英语模拟试题(二)
高二英语Unit3测试题及答案
高一英语Good Friends阅读课件 5
高二上学期英语单词拼写练习
高三英语Behind the Headlines课件
七年级英语上册Unit1 comic strip and welcome to the unit学案
高一英语上册My first ride on a train课件
外研版七年级英语上册Modules 6-7学案
福建省三明市泰宁一中2011届高三第二次质检英语试题
2011年中考英语模拟试卷(三)含参考答案
北京顺义区2010年中考二模英语试题及答案
广西崇左市龙州县高级中学高二英语《主谓一致讲解》课件
2010年中考英语综合填空题题型讲解与专项练习汇编
2011年中考英语模拟卷(新人教版)
威海市2010年初中升学考试模拟试题
安徽省蚌埠二中2011届高三第一次质检(英语)
北京石景山区2010年中考二模英语试题及答案
2010年中考英语模拟试题(二)
2013届江西省吉安一中高二英语上学期期中试卷及答案
北京市海淀区高三英语上学期期中试卷及答案
外研版七年级英语上学期期末试卷分析与讲解学案
高中英语第五册Unit7 课件
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |