The Analytical Writing section of the GRE revised General Test consists of two separately timed analytical writing tasks:
1.An Analyze an Issue task
2.An Analyze an Argument task
Analyze An Issue Task
The Analyze an Issue task assesses your ability to think critically about a topic of general interest and to clearly express your thoughts about it in writing. Each issue statement makes a claim that you can discuss from various perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions. The issue statement is followed by a set of specific instructions. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
2.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
3.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
4.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
5.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
6.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Analyze An Argument Task
The Analyze an Argument task assesses your ability to understand, analyze and evaluate arguments and to clearly convey your evaluation in writing. You are presented with a brief passage in which the author makes a case for some course of action or interpretation of events by presenting claims backed by reasons and evidence. Your task is to discuss the logical soundness of the authors case according to the specific instructions by critically examining the line of reasoning and the use of evidence. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
2.Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
3.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
4.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.
5.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
6.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
7.Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
习近平西雅图演讲(双语全文)[1]
2016白宫记者协会晚宴 段子手奥巴马火力全开
习近平英国议会发表讲话 引莎士比亚名言
奥巴马:在夏季奥运会中呈现最好的美国
威廉王子登上中国综艺节目 宣传保护野生动物
环境保护词汇集锦
马特达蒙MIT演讲--失败是走向成功的最好盔甲!
夏季衣装词汇专柜
国际货币基金组织总裁拉加德宣布人民币加入SDR
手机词汇知多少
2016年奥巴马总统父亲节演讲
Facebook桑德伯格加州大学伯克利分校2016毕业演讲--我从死亡中学到的东西
凯特王妃在英国SportsAid40周年晚宴上的致辞
水果词汇大拼盘
习近平在气候变化巴黎大会开幕式上讲话(双语全文)[1]
马云纽约经济俱乐部英语演讲
英国首相卡梅伦就脱欧公投发表讲话 宣布将辞职
美容词汇套装
纯正英伦腔:英国女王2016年议会演讲
一年一度最美英音:英女王2015圣诞致辞
希拉里参选视频(双语)
第九届上海国际电影节获奖名单
斯皮尔伯格2016年哈佛大学演讲
奥巴马发表反恐全国讲话 誓言摧毁伊斯兰国
习近平主席2016年新年贺词(双语全文)
奥巴马精彩演讲:我们为什么要上学
哈佛大学校长德鲁·福斯特2015年毕业典礼演讲
2016奥巴马母亲节致辞
纯正英音演讲,除了女王,还有凯特!
习近平在第70届联合国大会一般性辩论时讲话[1]
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |