The Analytical Writing section of the GRE revised General Test consists of two separately timed analytical writing tasks:
1.An Analyze an Issue task
2.An Analyze an Argument task
Analyze An Issue Task
The Analyze an Issue task assesses your ability to think critically about a topic of general interest and to clearly express your thoughts about it in writing. Each issue statement makes a claim that you can discuss from various perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions. The issue statement is followed by a set of specific instructions. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
2.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
3.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
4.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
5.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
6.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Analyze An Argument Task
The Analyze an Argument task assesses your ability to understand, analyze and evaluate arguments and to clearly convey your evaluation in writing. You are presented with a brief passage in which the author makes a case for some course of action or interpretation of events by presenting claims backed by reasons and evidence. Your task is to discuss the logical soundness of the authors case according to the specific instructions by critically examining the line of reasoning and the use of evidence. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
2.Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
3.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
4.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.
5.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
6.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
7.Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
雅思写作参考资料:旅游的利弊(英)
雅思写作头脑风暴:保留文化传统
雅思写作头脑风暴:适合学外语的年龄
雅思作文怎么写才能拿高分?
雅思写作高频词汇替换语料库
雅思写作头脑风暴:发明新语言
雅思写作头脑风暴:年轻人辍学工作就业率低
雅思写作范文赏析:留学的利弊
中国考生的三大雅思写作备考误区
雅思写作考试的七点注意事项
雅思写作头脑风暴:监狱的功能
雅思写作头脑风暴:手机的使用
雅思写作部分的七大注意事项
雅思写作头脑风暴:保护文化特点
雅思写作头脑风暴:记者应具备的品质
雅思写作头脑风暴:应该阻止人们用汽车吗?
雅思写作:雅思小作文的写作步骤指导
雅思写作备考必知的九个注意事项
暑假期间备考雅思写作的方法介绍
雅思写作头脑风暴:大力发展旅游业
雅思句子分析:But on any given day…
词汇量不足也能写好雅思作文
浅谈雅思议论文的论证方法(二)
雅思写作头脑风暴:空运水果和蔬菜
让你的雅思作文保持“简洁完美”的三条建议
雅思写作头脑风暴:对高等教育的资助
雅思造句练习:A的产生不仅因为B 也因为C
雅思写作头脑风暴:课堂教育
雅思写作需要培养的两大基本功:词汇和句型
雅思写作头脑风暴:非面对面活动
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |