The Analytical Writing section of the GRE revised General Test consists of two separately timed analytical writing tasks:
1.An Analyze an Issue task
2.An Analyze an Argument task
Analyze An Issue Task
The Analyze an Issue task assesses your ability to think critically about a topic of general interest and to clearly express your thoughts about it in writing. Each issue statement makes a claim that you can discuss from various perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions. The issue statement is followed by a set of specific instructions. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
2.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
3.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
4.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
5.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
6.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Analyze An Argument Task
The Analyze an Argument task assesses your ability to understand, analyze and evaluate arguments and to clearly convey your evaluation in writing. You are presented with a brief passage in which the author makes a case for some course of action or interpretation of events by presenting claims backed by reasons and evidence. Your task is to discuss the logical soundness of the authors case according to the specific instructions by critically examining the line of reasoning and the use of evidence. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
2.Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
3.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
4.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.
5.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
6.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
7.Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
12岁女孩考上大学 5岁熟识英语常用单词及语句
名师给小升初学生的12个单词记忆法
小升初孩子需要培养的:英语学习好习惯
新概念英语123课堂笔记集锦
专家建议 小升初孩子暑期计划学习尽快适应初中
小升初孩子怎样学好英语音标?
“三步走”帮助小升初孩子摆脱哑巴英语
常用英语口语排行榜 50句
名师谈怎样利用音乐让小升初孩子学好英语
剑桥少儿英语学习的几点建议
五龄童能识字读报 翻译英语单词
小学英语课堂用语100句
剑桥少儿英语二级下 口语对话
剑桥少儿英语一级考试纲要
三一口语应试有何技巧?
人大附中英语奇才 三岁开始英语启蒙教育
新概念英语大赛落幕 学而思获最佳组织奖
剑桥少儿英语二级主要句型
“小升初”英语 咋过渡 名师给孩子“引路”
剑桥少儿英语音标与发音 七大规则
家长必读:剑桥少儿英语三级考前全揭秘
三一口语三级考试复习题大全
能玩会学 她12岁过英语四级
小学孩子怎样学英语最有效
09年6月剑桥五级KET/PET通过的学而思学员名单
苦练两个月 10岁娃英语演绎经典故事(图)
训练小学生正确英语发音的三妙招
从现实生活中帮助小学生学英语
小学英语“F”字母开头的单词
小升初家长自述孩子失败教训:新概念英语没学好
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |