The Analytical Writing section of the GRE revised General Test consists of two separately timed analytical writing tasks:
1.An Analyze an Issue task
2.An Analyze an Argument task
Analyze An Issue Task
The Analyze an Issue task assesses your ability to think critically about a topic of general interest and to clearly express your thoughts about it in writing. Each issue statement makes a claim that you can discuss from various perspectives and apply to many different situations or conditions. The issue statement is followed by a set of specific instructions. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
2.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
3.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
4.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
5.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
6.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Analyze An Argument Task
The Analyze an Argument task assesses your ability to understand, analyze and evaluate arguments and to clearly convey your evaluation in writing. You are presented with a brief passage in which the author makes a case for some course of action or interpretation of events by presenting claims backed by reasons and evidence. Your task is to discuss the logical soundness of the authors case according to the specific instructions by critically examining the line of reasoning and the use of evidence. The specific instructions could be one of the following:
1.Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
2.Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
3.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
4.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.
5.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
6.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
7.Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
马云开推特,宣布向美国、非洲捐物资,外国网友齐刷刷:Thank you!
体坛英语资讯:PSG beat Nantes 2-1 to go 15 points clear on table
国内英语资讯:Chinese premier stresses support for market entities
经济自由度:美国排名日益萎缩
国内英语资讯:China calls for targeted measures to curb cross-border COVID-19 transmission
国内英语资讯:China ready to help Britain in COVID-19 fight: Chinese FM
NSA每天搜集2亿条短信
国际英语资讯:Indian PM Modi appeals to citizens to isolate at home, self-impose curfew amid COVID-19 scar
米歇尔50岁生日:美媒解开米歇尔5大神话
国内英语资讯:Wuhan to reopen commercial outlets in part of residential communities
关于日本人口危机你不得不知道的几件事
疫情全球爆发,有航空公司裁员90%
国内英语资讯:Iranian diplomat speaks highly of Chinas support to Iran amid outbreak
求职面试中怎样谈自己的缺点?
We Are Families 民族团结一家亲
国际英语资讯:Zimbabwes Mnangagwa thanks China for support in fight against COVID-19
日本取消赏樱活动 武汉大学在线赏樱获赞
国际英语资讯:U.S. imposes Iran-related sanctions amid Irans suffering from coronavirus
体坛英语资讯:Marseille beat Saint-Etienne to cut gap to PSG
国际英语资讯:Nepal announces ban on incoming international flights
An Old Man 一位老人
体坛英语资讯:Second division Mirandes into Copa del Rey semifinal
体坛英语资讯:Bayern carve out 4-3 win over Hoffenheim to book German Cup quarterfinals
国内英语资讯:Chinas Hubei sends over 1,600 migrant workers to Guangdong
国际英语资讯:Palestinian president stresses fight against COVID-19
国际英语资讯:Irans president calls for removal of U.S. sanctions amid COVID-19 outbreak
美文赏析:回忆再美 也不要徘徊不前
体坛英语资讯:Cheruiyot relishes fifth Olympic Games, anchors Kenyas marathon team
国内英语资讯:Xi, Putin discuss strengthening cooperation on fighting COVID-19 by phone
国内英语资讯:Chinese mainland reports 41 newly imported COVID-19 cases
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |