The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine
The decline in the numbers of amphibians worldwide clearly indicates the global pollution of water and air. Two studies of amphibians in Yosemite National Park in California confirm my conclusion. In 1915 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there were abundant numbers of each species. However, in 1992 there were only four species of amphibians observed in the park, and the numbers of each species were drastically reduced. The decline in Yosemite has been blamed on the introduction of trout into the parks waters, which began in 1920 . But the introduction of trout cannot be the real reason for the Yosemite decline because it does not explain the worldwide decline.
Sample Essay
In this argument, the writer of the letter concludes that global pollution of water and air has caused a decline in the number of amphibians worldwide. To support his or her conclusion, the writer cites the results of two studies, seventy-five years apart, that purportedly show that the number of amphibians in one park in California, Yosemite National Park, have drastically declined. Additionally, the writer casts aside a given reason for the decline, stating that the introduction of trout to the park does not explain the worldwide decline in the number of amphibians. This argument defies simple logic and suffers from several critical fallacies.
First of all, the argument is based on only two studies in one specific part of the world, Yosemite National Park in California. It is impossible to pinpoint a worldwide theory for the decline of amphibians based on any number of studies in only one specific location in the world - the specific varieties of amphibians, geographical conditions and other location specific variables prohibit such a sweeping generalization. One very specific location cannot be used as a model for all other locations, even within one particular country, let alone the entire world. The writer provides no evidenced whatsoever that links the Yosemite study with any purported effects anywhere else in the global environment.
Secondly, the two separate studies were done seventy-five years apart. There is no evidence that the two studies were conducted in a similar manner over the same duration of time or even over the same exact areas of Yosemite National Park, or that the exact same study methods were used. For example, perhaps the first study lasted over an entire year and was conducted by twenty-five experts in amphibious biology, resulting in the finding of seven species of amphibians in abundant numbers. By contrast, perhaps the second study was conducted over a period of one week by a lone high school student as a school science project. The writer offers no basis on which to compare the two studies, leaving it open as to whether the two are truly comparable in their breadth, scope and expertise.
Finally, the writer notes that the decline in the amphibian population has been blamed on the introduction of trout into the parks waters in 1920, but then dismisses that argument on the purely specious basis that it does not explain the worldwide decline. This part of the argument blithely dismisses the very relevant fact that trout are known to eat amphibian eggs. This attempt to prove a negative is the last resort of those in search of some vain attempt to prove the truth of the matter that they are asserting. It is basically impossible to prove a negative this is an attempt to shift the burden of proof back on to the nonbelievers of the argument. The global environmental situation and that of Yosemite National Park are not perfectly correlated, and the fact that the trout may very well be responsible for the decline cannot simply be dismissed without further proof.
In summary, the writer fails to establish any causal relationship between global air and water pollution and the decline of amphibious life worldwide. The evidence presented is extremely weak at best and narrowly focuses on one tiny area of the globe, as well as putting forward as proof two studies about which almost nothing is known. For a stronger argument, the writer would need to directly put forth evidence associating air and water pollution with not only the decline at Yosemite but also throughout other areas of the world.
法国在强奸案发学校进行大规模DNA测试
总觉得自己不够好?你需要记住的14句话
自恋美少年爱自拍:自称“澳版帕里斯希尔顿”
现如今北京全球化程度已超华盛顿
商务人士 一部手机不够用怎么办?
中国游客最爱去哪儿旅游
外语让你更聪明:双语学习的七大优势
韩国整容后回不了国?医院给海关开证明
国际英语资讯:Trump approval rating drops as expectations for recession, China trade concerns grow
为什么要读名著:阅读经典名著能锻炼大脑!
再见NOKIA:诺基亚将更名微软移动Oy
重燃人们快速阅读的兴趣
体坛英语资讯:2nd China Youth Games concludes in Taiyuan
儿时记忆良多 成人后它们都有什么威力?
一些与伴侣增进感情的小秘诀
至死不渝!夫妻结婚70载 15小时先后离世
贫民窟的百万球星:印16岁男孩入选曼联
奖励辛苦工作的你:来一趟悠然假期吧!
美翻了:哥斯达黎加间歇火山喷花瓣雨
莎士比亚——赞誉与质疑并存
拒绝心力衰竭 打造强健心脏之路
国际英语资讯:Italys new govt survives final parliament challenge; 2020 budget debate awaits
《百年孤独》作者加西亚-马尔克斯去世
英发廊用金正恩发型做广告 遭朝鲜官员警告
35年!有爱父亲为女儿完成精美玩偶小屋
196本书带你读懂196个国家
世界最大的兔子 每天吃12根胡萝卜
马尔克斯名言录:你跳过的舞只属于你
国际英语资讯:Israeli PMs annexation plan draws condemnation from Palestinian, Arab leaders
英媒:中国留学生为何不能取得好成绩?
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |