Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
威廉王子25岁了!
八国峰会:默克尔丈夫有点“羞涩”
调查:选秀节目风光不再
英国工作时间居发达国家之首
国内英语资讯:Senior official urges efforts to end poverty on time
布莱尔首相“幸运鞋”大曝光!
国内英语资讯:Xi, Bolsonaro exchange congratulations on satellite launch
你让孩子姓什么?
《你如此美丽》获封“最烦人歌曲”
一把木吉他送给布莱尔……
“谨防”职场友谊!-英语点津
调查:莫斯科当选“最贵”城市
国内英语资讯:Xi urges Macao SAR govt officials to demonstrate sense of responsibility
凯瑟琳•泽塔-琼斯:老公、孩子最重要
美容护肤别乱搞,越来越多人因植物精油中毒
唱给戴安娜王妃的歌……-英语点津
姚明叶莉八月完婚!
八国峰会:加总理不见U2主唱波诺
父亲节!来给老爸挑礼物!
Friends Around Me 身边的朋友
撒切尔夫人:香港没有让我失望
八国峰会:萨科奇夫人请人“帮忙”
体坛英语资讯:Medvedeva leads over Trusova in ladies short program at ISU Grand Prix Rostelecom Cup
英国第一夫人之初印象
英国人都在愁些什么?
科学家发明出新型电脑,和人一样能忘事
新型的悬浮火车超级快,可能要取代飞机
希拉里:信仰帮我度过婚姻危机
健康讲堂:宝宝不宜经常洗澡
联合国的气候峰会,又没解决问题
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |