Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
如何运用新概念英语第二册提高高考分数
貌似神离的英语句子解读
英国议会抨击边境管理局
新概念英语第二册 写作宝典
冀教版直接引语和间接引语知识点梳理及练习
中招试题中的动词时态专练
英国重申欢迎华为投资
让今年更赚钱的六大投资思路
学习经验:其实英语实在太简单了
中考英语词汇用法复习课件(共9份打包)
新概念英语学习记忆英语单词的十种妙法
新概念英语背诵具体方法
浅谈新概念英语五步剖析的学习方法
背诵新概念英语的正确方法
浅谈英语学习中单词及学习方法积累的作用
如何高效率的自学外语?
网帖折射中国80后的养老焦虑
学生时代如何学习英语
新概念英语第二册单词、背诵和写作学习总结
感动:那溢满鲜花的巴士
新概念英语课文背诵对学习英语的重要性
三个月背108篇 新概念英语学习方法经验谈
新加坡推出“把车停到家里”的豪华公寓
外滩地块引发中国开发商法律战
背单词的技巧方法:背一记二不过三
日本抗议中国渔政船进入钓鱼岛海域
东盟对美国态度转冷
中考英语语法复习课件(共5份打包)
新东方名师指导新概念的背法
FT社评:奥巴马对缅甸应鼓励与施压并举
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |