Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
体坛英语资讯:Australian Nikki Garrett finishes fifth in UNIQA Ladies Golf Open
体坛英语资讯:Dutch Olympic medalist tells Youth Olympics athletes to stick to faith
我国每年有近50万老人走失
体坛英语资讯:Soderling, Djokovic into U.S. Open quarters
体坛英语资讯:South African winning rugby coach wants job back
体坛英语资讯:Wozniacki wins Rogers Cup
体坛英语资讯:Cruzeiro comes from behind to beat Palmeiras 3-2
体坛英语资讯:Russias most powerful celebrity: Sharapova
体坛英语资讯:Bolt renews sponsorship deal with Puma
一次愉快的合作 A Happy Cooperation
中世纪的英国国王饮食大揭秘
体坛英语资讯:Internacional and Atletico-GO draw 1-1
雅思口语范文之gift
体坛英语资讯:Brazilian basketball fans lament continuation of jinx against Argentina
课外阅读 After-class Reading
体坛英语资讯:Wozniacki upsets Sharapova, Kuznetsova exits at U.S. Open
体坛英语资讯:Federer wins Cincinnati title
体坛英语资讯:Tiger Woods and wife Elin divorce after sex scandal: magazine
体坛英语资讯:Top seed Lee eases through opening round at badminton worlds
体坛英语资讯:Nadal, Clijsters, Venus advance while Murray out at US Open
万圣节夜话之千万别开灯
看美国大选辩论学英语系列(二)
体坛英语资讯:Barca, Real expected to dominate as Spanish league prepares kickoff
体坛英语资讯:Man. United held to 2-2 draw at Fulham
减肥MM的福音 15种越吃越瘦的食物
英语单词不用逐个背,252个词根就够了(二)
体坛英语资讯:Sevilla crashes out of Champions League to Sporting Brage
想要快乐? 那么就不要做以下三件事!
体坛英语资讯:Spain cruises to comfortable win in Liechtenstein
联合国秘书长潘基文2016年世界反对死刑日致辞
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |