Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业48
一周热词榜(12.24-30)[1]-30)
2016届高考英语一轮复习 语法专题 交际用语 外研版
2016届高考英语一轮复习 语法专题 情态动词 外研版
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:选修8Modules1-2
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业38
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:选修8Modules3-4
伊拉克2016年近7千平民死于恐怖袭击和其他暴力
2016届高考英语一轮复习 语法专题 动词和动词短语 外研版
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:必修4Module3
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业37
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业46
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:必修5Module4
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:必修5Module1
叙利亚反政府力量中止和谈计划
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业47
全球领导人新年贺词都说了些啥?
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:必修2Module3
2016届高考英语一轮复习 语法专题 代词 外研版
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:选修7Modules3-4
2016届高考英语一轮复习 语法专题 虚拟语气 外研版
2016届高考英语一轮复习 语法专题 介词和介词短语 外研版
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业35
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:必修4Module6
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:必修5Module3
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业36
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业41
2016届高考英语(外研版 全国)一轮复习教学案:选修6Modules5-6
2016届北师大版高三一轮总复习英语课时作业39
2016届高考英语一轮复习 语法专题 非谓语动词 外研版
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |