Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 11 My face》ppt课件3
冀教版(一起)三下《Lesson 4 Laugh and cry》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 29 Old and new》ppt课件1
冀教版(一起)三下《lesson 21 At the toy shop》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)三上《Lesson 10 Find the food》ppt课件
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 3 Lesson20 let’s learn the alphabet》PPT课件
冀教版(一起)二上《Lesson 7 Numbers》ppt课件
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 2 Lesson12 I cook》PPT课件
冀教版(一起)二上《Lesson 27 Favourite colour》ppt课件
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 3 Lesson18 What’s for lunch 课堂教学》PPT课件包
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 3 Lesson21 Let’s visit the neighbours》PPT课件
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 11 My face》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)三上《Lesson 2 I like school》ppt课件
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 2 Lesson11 put away your toys》PPT课件
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 29 Old and new》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 26 Clothes for boys and girls》ppt课件
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 2 Lesson15 Help my family》PPT课件
冀教版(一起)二上《Lesson 2 How are you》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 15 I hear with my ears》ppt课件
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 3 Lesson18 what’s for lunch》PPT课件2
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 11 My face》ppt课件1
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 11 My face》ppt课件2
冀教版(一起)二上《lesson 26 Clothes for boys and girls》ppt课件1
冀教版(一起)三上《Lesson 20 Hamburgers and French fries》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)二上《Lesson 12 I see with my eyes》ppt课件
冀教版英语二下(一起)《Unit 3 Lesson23 Let’s have tea》PPT课件
冀教版(一起)三上《Lesson 22 It’s Jenny’s birthday》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)二上《Lesson 22 My body》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)三下《lesson 22 At the market》ppt课件
冀教版(一起)二上《Lesson 23 Letters》ppt课件
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |