Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(八):文艺类阅读2
SAT考试阅读难点讲解(一)
SAT阅读Sentence Completion题型讲解
SAT考试阅读难点讲解(二)
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(五)
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 1
SAT阅读答题技巧与题型分析
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(四)
SAT阅读技巧讲解
SAT阅读完成句子试题6 含中文注释
SAT考试填空常考单词总结2
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 4
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(一)
SAT阅读完成句子练习题(十)
SAT阅读真题
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(九):文艺类阅读
SAT考试阅读高分不再难
SAT填空练习贵在精细
SAT阅读完成句子习题(二)
SAT阅读讲解:文章的分类
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(三)
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(十一):短篇阅读
SAT阅读考试三大误区
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 10
SAT阅读高分攻略系列(八):文艺类阅读3
如何深入理解SAT考试阅读题
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 11
SAT阅读题Sentence Completion第四套
SAT阅读考试不再难,破解生词有方法
SAT阅读练习题:Reading Comprehension Test 14
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |