Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
奥运英语作文:中国跳水队(Diving into Gold: China's Dream Team)
高考英语作文备考资料:常用词汇集合及用法
经典英语作文范例阅读:改革开放30年
奥运英语作文 北京奥运开幕式
文章结构好似人骨架 09年高考英语作文构思法
2009年高考英语热点作文经典范文阅读
奥运志愿者短文 微笑Smile
北京市08年高考英语开放式作文点评和习作修改
2002年高考英语作文 看图作文
奥运志愿者短文 对手 Opponent
高考英文写作务必提高“结构设计能力”
经典英语写作资料:高考英语作文万能模板
高考英语作文写作:六种结尾方式示例指导
2009年高考英语作文题目预测及范文阅读
高考英语作文的文章的结尾
看电视的好处 英语作文
2009年高考英语作文指导:最新三篇范文阅读
日常进行积累 权威名师指导高考英语写作练习
高中英语作文 Keeping Water Sources Clean(保持水源清洁)
奥运英语作文 关于北京奥运会闭幕式的
高考英语作文可引用的高频36句谚语格言
奥运志愿者短文 Olympic Athletes
高考英文写作技巧 让整个文章“靓”起来
奥运英语作文:我最喜欢的中国体操队员(The Chinese gymnast I like best)
充分发挥想象力 高考英文景物写作技巧
英语作文中常用到的名人名言
高考英语写作辅导:注意记住和累积固定句型
奥运英语作文 奥运会上中国队能否夺得最多的金牌?
高考英语作文经典句式及过度句
学习方法:坚持八条英文写作守则
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |