Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
Should parents and communities participate in local education because education is too important to leave to professional educators, as the speaker asserts? It might be tempting to agree with the speaker, based on a parents legal authority over, familiarity with, and interest in his or her own children. However, a far more compelling argument can be made that, except for major decisions such as choice of school, a childs education is best left to professional educators.
Communities of parents concerned about their childrens education rely on three arguments for active parental and community participation in that process. The first argument, and the one expressed most often and vociferously, is that parents hold the ultimately legal authority to make key decisions about what and how their own children learn including choice of curriculum and text books, pace and schedule for learning, and the extent to which their child should learn alongside other children. The second argument is that only a parent can truly know the unique needs of a child including what educational choices are best suited for the child. The third argument is that parents are more motivated--by pride and ego--than any other person to take whatever measures are needed to ensure their children receive the best possible education.
Careful examination of these three arguments, however, reveals that they are specious at best. As for the first one, were we to allow parents the right to make all major decisions regarding the education of their children, many children would go with little or no education. In a perfect world parents would always make their childrens education one of their highest priorities. Yet, in fact many parents do not. As for the second argument, parents are not necessarily best equipped to know what is best for their child when it comes to education. Although most parents might think they are sufficiently expert by virtue of having gone through formal education themselves, parents lack the specialized training to appreciate what pedagogical methods are most effective, what constitutes a balanced education, how developmental psychology affects a childs capacity for learning at different levels and at different stages of childhood. Professional educators, by virtue of their specialized training in these areas, are far better able to ensure that a child receives a balanced, properly paced education.
There are two additional compelling arguments against the speakers contention. First, parents are too subjective to always know what is truly best for their children. For example, many parents try to overcome their own shortcomings and failed self-expectations vicariously through their childrens accomplishments. Most of us have known parents who push their child to excel in certain areas--to the emotional and psychological detriment of the child. Secondly, if too many parties become involved in making decisions about day-to-day instruction, the end result might be infighting, legal battles, boycotts, and other protests, all of which impede the educational process; and the ultimate victims are the children themselves. Finally, in many jurisdictions parents now have the option of schooling their children at home, as long as certain state requirements are met. In my observation, home schooling allows parents who prefer it great control over a childs education, while allowing the professional educators to discharge their responsibilities as effectively as possible--unfettered by gadfly parents who constantly interfere and intervene.
In sum, while parents might seem better able and better motivated to make key decisions about their childs education, in many cases they are not. With the possible exceptions of responsible home-schoolers, a childs intellectual, social, and psychological development is at risk when communities of parents dominate the decision-making process involving education.
体坛英语资讯:Chinas top male shuttlers quit Hong Kong Open with top duo ousted
体坛英语资讯:Zhejiang bounce back to beat Henan in WCBA
体坛英语资讯:Ronaldo says tired of soccer
体坛英语资讯:Brown resigns from Bobcats coaching post
体坛英语资讯:Mourinho pleased with his achievements in 2010
体坛英语资讯:Maria keeps Real in chase of Barcelona
体坛英语资讯:Big names in doping news as biological passport shows power
体坛英语资讯:Benitez to rescind contract with Inter
体坛英语资讯:Leonardo appointed as new coach of Inter Milan
体坛英语资讯:Yao Ming injured again to endanger career
体坛英语资讯:Man. United stride to lead after win over Sunderland
体坛英语资讯:Internacional re-signs coach Celso Roth for 2011
体坛英语资讯:Benitez sacked by Inter
体坛英语资讯:CBA kicks off new season and battle against scandal
体坛英语资讯:PSV striker Reis out for the season
体坛英语资讯:Brazils Atletico-MG signs Richarlyson
体坛英语资讯:FIFA awarded tax-free in Brazil to organize 2014 World Cup
体坛英语资讯:Borriello scores as Milan lose to Roma 1-0
体坛英语资讯:U.S. golfer Gates takes 2nd round lead in Australian PGA
体坛英语资讯:Barca held to scoreless in Spanish Cup
体坛英语资讯:Gremio close to signing Ronaldinho from AC Milan
体坛英语资讯:Carlos Alberto Parreira retires from coaching
体坛英语资讯:Etoo named African Footballer of the Year
体坛英语资讯:Sevilla draws against Dortmund to reach last 32 of Europa League
体坛英语资讯:Napoli coach happy with tough win against Lecce
体坛英语资讯:Zico approves Flamengos desire for Ronaldinho
体坛英语资讯:Adriano confirms stays in Italy
体坛英语资讯:Els wins South African golf open
体坛英语资讯:Parma beat Fiorentina in Italian Cup
体坛英语资讯:Brazilian racer Di Grassi wins karts competition
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |