A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
The speaker would prefer a national curriculum for all children up until college instead of allowing schools in different regions the freedom to decide on their own curricula. I agree insofar as some common core curriculum would serve useful purposes for any nation .At the same time , however , individual states and communities should have some freedom to augment any such curriculum as they see fit; otherwise, a nations educational system might defeat its own purposes in the long term.
A national curriculum would be beneficial to a nation in a number of respects .First of all, by providing all children with fundamental skills and knowledge, a common core curriculum memebers of society. In addition, a common core curriculum would provide a predictable foundation upon which college administrators and faculty could more easily build curricula and select course materials for freshmen that are neither below nor above their level of educaitonal experience.Finally, a core curriculum would ensure that all school-children are taught core values upon which any democratic society depaends to thrive, and even survive-values such as tolerance of others with different viewpoints ,and respect for others.
However, a common curriculum that is also an exdusive one would pose certain problems, which might outweight the benefits, noted above, First of all, on what basis would certain likelihood these decisions would be in the hands of federal legislators and regulators, who are likely to have theis own quirky notions of what should and should not be taught to children-notions that may or may not reflect those of most communities , schools, or parents.Besides,government officials are notoriously susceptible to influence-pedding by lobbyists who do not have the best interests of societys children in mind.
Secondly, an official, federally sanctioned curriculum would facilitiate the dissemination of propaganda and other dogma which because of its biased and one-sided nature undermines the very purpose of true education: to enlighten. I can easily foresee the banning of certain text books ,programs ,and websites which provide information and perspectives that the government might wish to suppress-as some sort of threat to its authority and power.Althought this scenario might seem far-fetched,these sorts of concerns are being raised already at the state level.
Thirdly, the inflexible nature of a uniform national curriculum would preclude the inclusion of programs. courses, and materials that are primarily of regional or local signifcance.For example, California requires children at certain grade levels to learn about the history of particular ethnic groups who make up the states diverse population. A national curriculum might not allow for this feature, and Californias youngsters would be worse off as a result of their ignorance about the traditions,values,and cultural contributions of all the people whose citizenship they share.
finally, it seems to me that imposing a uniform national curriculum would serve to undermine the authority of parents over their own children , to even a greater extent than uniform state laws currently do . Admittedly ,laws requiring parents to ensure that their chiledren receive an education that meets certain minimum standards are well-justified,for the reasons mentioned earilier.However, when such standards are imposed by the state rather at the community level parents are left with far less power to particapate meaningfully in the decision-making process.This problem would only be exacerbated where decisions left exclusively to federal regulations.
In the final analysis, homogenization of elementary and secondary education would amout to a double-edged sword. while it would serve as an insurance policy against a future populated with illiterates and ignoramuses, at the same time it might serve to obliterate cultural diversity and tradition. The optimal federal approach, in my view, is a balanced one that imposes a basic curriculum yet leaves the rest up to each state -or better yet, to each community.
北京奥运村迎来首批“村民”
双语:牙膏会让胎儿大脑受损?
北京奥运闭幕式:贝克汉姆“领衔”伦敦8分钟
玛丽亚凯莉带孕大秀59美元平价钻戒
双语:《绝望主妇》第七季被爆有新主妇加入
捷克男主持效仿Lady Gaga穿鲜肉装
罗格北京奥运会开幕式致辞全文
今年圣诞不寂寞 “扁平爸爸”相作伴
漂亮妈妈多生女 美男渐成稀缺品
加媒抱怨“亚洲学生太多” 亚裔表示强烈不满
NASA首次发现土星卫星中含有氧气
韩电视台曝光奥运开幕式遭谴责
威廉王子未婚妻凯特订婚长裙惨遭山寨
20世纪最无聊一天:1954年4月11日
刘欢、莎拉•布莱曼将演唱奥运主题歌
奥运双语八卦:中国羽坛的夫妻档
美国人视角:享受奥运,向中国学习
网通电信宣布:台湾地震受损电缆恢复运作
英国全民打赌:谁为准王妃凯特做嫁衣
台湾学生数学成绩全球排名第一
澳大利亚青年欲破世界最长说唱纪录
北京奥运主题歌《我和你》传递温暖
谷歌街景拍到有人街头生孩子 旁边医院毫不知情
巴西男足教练:“奥运会夺金比世界杯夺冠难”
美国人喜好调查:最爱披头士最恨慢车
崔始源林依晨加盟内地版《绯闻女孩》
研究发现:人类大脑无法判断对方性别
英学生爱提笔忘字 高考竟出题测拼写
大小贾斯汀共享“恋爱秘籍”:冷静承诺
走马观花看美国:芝加哥繁华下的另一面
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |