In this argument, the arguer concludes that sending the mechanics of GAA to a two-week QCS on proper maintenance procedures will automatically lead to improved maintenance and to greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits for the airline. To support the conclusion, the arguer points out that the performance of the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry improved markedly after their crews had attended the seminar. In addition, the arguer reasons that since the maintenance crews of the automobile racing industry and the mechanics of GAA perform many of the same functions, the airlines will gain similar benefits from the training program. This argument suffers from several critical fallacies.
In this argument, the arguer recommends that C should advise its citizens to install both air conditioners and fans for cooling in order to reduce the cost of electricity. To justify this claim, the arguer provides the evidence that many citizens of C suffer from the rising costs of electricity. In addition, he cites the result of a recent study that using fans alone costs more than using air conditioners alone, and that using both fans and air conditioners costs less than either using fans or air conditioners alone. A careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless the conclusion is.
In this analysis, the arguer claims that P University should offer employment to the spouse of each new faculty member that they hire. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of B College where professors prefer to have their spouse employed in the same geographical area. In addition, the arguer assumes that this offer of possible job for their spouse on the campus, no matter whether it will be accepted, is the only factor that new professors consider in deciding whether to accept a university position. This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.
In this argument, the arguer advocates that the C Corporation should hire DF, a family owned local company that offers varied menu of fish and poultry, instead of GT Company, the present supplier of food in Cs employee cafeteria. The recommendation is based on the observation that the GT is expensive, that its prices have kept rising, that it does not serve special diets, and that three employees complained about it. Meanwhile, the arguer assumes D to be a better choice for C because a sample lunch of this company that the arguer happened to taste was delicious. This argument is problematic for two reasons.
The conclusion in this argument is that F College can expect to increase enrollment by promising to find jobs for students after graduation. In support of this prediction, the arguer claims that college-bound students are increasingly concerned about job prospects after graduation. Moreover, the arguer assumes that this attempt has three benefits: to enable F to compete with more famous schools; to encourage students to start career preparation early; to encourage students to complete their coursework. This argument is fraught with vague, oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions.
如何设计构造提升GMAT写作成绩
GMAT写作如何短期斩获高分
哪些GMAT作文句型经常容易出错
经典GMAT写作句型整理
GMAT写作两类档次结构介绍
来自GMAT官方的满分作文心得
GMAT写作最实用句型整理
GMAT写作快速提分有哪些技巧
GMAT写作入门需要了解哪些事儿
GMAT写作经典话题之收入类
如何利用修辞提高GMAT写作分数
GMAT写作如何做到不跑题
GMAT写作黄金句型整理
GMAT写作过渡词和修饰词如何使用
GMAT高分作文有哪些共性
GMAT写作各个段落都有哪些功能
GMAT写作开头到结尾的攻略
GMAT写作结构思路简介
GMAT写作字数是否关键
GMAT高分作文是如何诞生的
GMAT写作如何巧妙布局
GMAT写作模板应该怎样修改
GMAT写作逻辑通常有哪些漏洞
GMAT写作分数是如何评定的
GMAT写作需要多少分才够用
双向分析提升GMAT写作
GMAT写作考试经典话题整理
GMAT写作常见的三档作文
GMAT写作的段落如何划分
GMAT写作要尽量避开初级词汇
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |