In this argument, the arguer concludes that sending the mechanics of GAA to a two-week QCS on proper maintenance procedures will automatically lead to improved maintenance and to greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits for the airline. To support the conclusion, the arguer points out that the performance of the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry improved markedly after their crews had attended the seminar. In addition, the arguer reasons that since the maintenance crews of the automobile racing industry and the mechanics of GAA perform many of the same functions, the airlines will gain similar benefits from the training program. This argument suffers from several critical fallacies.
In this argument, the arguer recommends that C should advise its citizens to install both air conditioners and fans for cooling in order to reduce the cost of electricity. To justify this claim, the arguer provides the evidence that many citizens of C suffer from the rising costs of electricity. In addition, he cites the result of a recent study that using fans alone costs more than using air conditioners alone, and that using both fans and air conditioners costs less than either using fans or air conditioners alone. A careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless the conclusion is.
In this analysis, the arguer claims that P University should offer employment to the spouse of each new faculty member that they hire. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example of B College where professors prefer to have their spouse employed in the same geographical area. In addition, the arguer assumes that this offer of possible job for their spouse on the campus, no matter whether it will be accepted, is the only factor that new professors consider in deciding whether to accept a university position. This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.
In this argument, the arguer advocates that the C Corporation should hire DF, a family owned local company that offers varied menu of fish and poultry, instead of GT Company, the present supplier of food in Cs employee cafeteria. The recommendation is based on the observation that the GT is expensive, that its prices have kept rising, that it does not serve special diets, and that three employees complained about it. Meanwhile, the arguer assumes D to be a better choice for C because a sample lunch of this company that the arguer happened to taste was delicious. This argument is problematic for two reasons.
The conclusion in this argument is that F College can expect to increase enrollment by promising to find jobs for students after graduation. In support of this prediction, the arguer claims that college-bound students are increasingly concerned about job prospects after graduation. Moreover, the arguer assumes that this attempt has three benefits: to enable F to compete with more famous schools; to encourage students to start career preparation early; to encourage students to complete their coursework. This argument is fraught with vague, oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions.
影响雅思听力的7个因素及对策
提高雅思听力水平的4点技巧
有效提高雅思听力的四个方法
掌握正确地学习方法 五步提高雅思听力
雅思听力独白类文章答题分析
雅思听力答题的大写规则
雅思听力高分突破的七个方法
雅思听力中的替换原则
浅析雅思听力中的速度与反应力
雅思听力经典场景透析:银行
雅思听力考场的六点注意事项
雅思听力场景词汇:银行
提高雅思听力的三要素
雅思听力数字题9大难点分析
雅思听力高频词汇汇总(二)
雅思听力场景高频词:校园生活场景
雅思听力对话类文章答思路分析
雅思听力场景高频词:授课场景
雅思听力地图题解题步骤
雅思听力记笔记的技巧
雅思听力:提高英语听力水平的5个练习方法
雅思听力必备场景解析
雅思听力如何一遍就听懂
雅思听力场景攻关:新生报到篇
提高雅思听力需关注的4点
雅思听力答题的13点小细节需注意
雅思听力:提高听力水平的五个关键
如何突破雅思听力7分
浅析雅思听力的“三考点两场景”
雅思听力场景词汇:图书馆
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |