In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is in valid and misleading. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer would have to prove that college-bound students are most concerned about the promise of jobs after graduation and the F College can keep its promise in the end. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the recommendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that promising students jobs can actually encourage them to work harder in their study. Otherwise, the arguer is simply begging the question throughout the argument.
To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept the conclusion, the arguer must present more facts that GT has indeed to meet the requirements of C Corporation. To solidify the argument, the arguer would have to produce more evidence concerning the foods and service of D and how they can better meet the needs of Cs employees.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that an offer of employment to the spouse is the only condition that new professors consider on accepting Ps offer. Additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to rule out other possible causes of the low staff morale at the university.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the percentage of the affected families and their geographical distribution. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information regarding the electric expense relevant to the actual amount of time for cooling among, respectively, the three groups of households and the amount of electricity used for other purposes in all three groups of families under survey.
In conclusion, the arguer fails to establish a causal relationship between sending Get-Aways mechanics to the Quality-Care Seminar and improved maintenance, greater customer satisfaction and greater profits for the airline. To strengthen the argument, the argument, the arguer would have to provide evidence that automobile maintenance and airplane maintenance are similar in every aspect. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the relationship between improved maintenance and greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits.
揭秘雅思听力考试的出题原则
雅思听力不过是一场游戏 揭秘通关规则
雅思听力高频短语30个
雅思听力:养成良好的听力习惯很重要
课下如何自行复习雅思听力
雅思听力考试和国内听力考试的区别
雅思听力“衔接”能力的培养方法
雅思听力练习中的初听与细听
名师简析雅思听力出题者常用的原则
攻克雅思听力电话号码考点的窍门
雅思听力备考的需要注意的三个方面
雅思听力考场上的六个注意事项
雅思听力高频短句及例句100例
雅思听力备考的常见问题解答
新手备考雅思听力的三个学习策略
雅思听力地图题的三大解题原则
雅思听力陷阱介绍及应对方法
获取雅思听力高分的关键:精听+泛听+跟读
雅思听力突破方法:立体训练法
雅思听力练习中的4个问题
雅思听力考试的数字考点及词汇
避免雅思听力考试出现失误的四个方法
雅思听力场景全面分析:环保场景
半个月提高雅思听力1.5分的方法
雅思听力答案填写的13条小贴士
全真模拟题揭秘雅思听力做题技巧
四种雅思听力题型的解题方法
影响雅思听力理解的四大因素
详解雅思听力训练方法的操作方法
雅思听力的六字训练原则:有恒,有序,有量
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |