In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is in valid and misleading. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer would have to prove that college-bound students are most concerned about the promise of jobs after graduation and the F College can keep its promise in the end. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the recommendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that promising students jobs can actually encourage them to work harder in their study. Otherwise, the arguer is simply begging the question throughout the argument.
To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept the conclusion, the arguer must present more facts that GT has indeed to meet the requirements of C Corporation. To solidify the argument, the arguer would have to produce more evidence concerning the foods and service of D and how they can better meet the needs of Cs employees.
As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that an offer of employment to the spouse is the only condition that new professors consider on accepting Ps offer. Additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to rule out other possible causes of the low staff morale at the university.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the percentage of the affected families and their geographical distribution. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information regarding the electric expense relevant to the actual amount of time for cooling among, respectively, the three groups of households and the amount of electricity used for other purposes in all three groups of families under survey.
In conclusion, the arguer fails to establish a causal relationship between sending Get-Aways mechanics to the Quality-Care Seminar and improved maintenance, greater customer satisfaction and greater profits for the airline. To strengthen the argument, the argument, the arguer would have to provide evidence that automobile maintenance and airplane maintenance are similar in every aspect. To better evaluate the argument, we would need more information about the relationship between improved maintenance and greater customer satisfaction along with greater profits.
考生备考误区:雅思阅读 “慢工出细活”
雅思阅读:考试阅读技巧之学会浏览
雅思考试:summary题型备考方法
突破雅思阅读考试的 关键
雅思阅读:判断题的答案书写形式问题
边玩边学、提高雅思阅读能力 (上)
雅思阅读:浅析同义转换在中的重要性
喷饭雅思作文经典笑话
粗谈雅思阅读的基本复 习思路
超实用 !雅思阅读全面应对法
雅思阅读:制胜4部曲
雅思阅读:考试:认真地对待、积极地准备
雅思阅读:Choices题型攻略小总结
跨过雅思阅读障碍: 解析生词种类做到对症下药
雅思阅读真题类似文章 :蚂蚁智力
雅思阅读:巧记单词,技巧取胜
雅思“剑桥系列”阅读题
如何备战雅思阅读
法国雅思A类考试阅读原文:chocolate evolution
雅思阅读SUMMARY 题型解答
雅思阅读泛读中雅思词汇的 心有灵犀
雅思阅读单选题如何 做对
在考场中应对雅思阅读 考试的秘诀
雅思阅读:会“找”会“挑”
雅思阅读:如何攻克两大瓶颈
雅思阅读:考试技巧之逻辑关系
雅思阅读:全面应对法
雅思阅读:泛读中雅思词汇的心有灵犀
给低龄烤鸭 的雅思阅读 攻略
雅思阅读:Summary(摘要填空)题的终极技巧
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |