下面是一篇关于wage 的GRE官方满分范文。这篇GRE官方范文的主要背景是大多数公司都同意认为相较于工作带来的物理上的伤害的增加,员工的工资也应该增加。因为这会使员工在经济上觉得工作的地方是安全的:他们减少自己的薪金总额的花销然后存钱。
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.
The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.
This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment 。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.
上面就是GRE官方满分范文的全部内容,这篇GRE官方范文的 字数高达599words, 充分体现了字数为王的判分倾向。另外这篇官方范文是 标准的五段制,首段、GRE末端,中间三段,看上去非常舒服;而且整篇文章没有陈词滥调、没有满篇废话的模板式语言。这也是这篇文章能作为GRE官方范文的最主要原因。
精选英语美文阅读:Five Balls of Life 生命中的五个球
美国经典英文演讲100篇:Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech
英文名著精选阅读:《傲慢与偏见》第六章 第4节
希拉里在美中生态伙伴关系协定签署仪式的讲话(交传视频)
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第一章:朝圣 第8节
奥巴马每周电台演讲之圣诞节
演讲好比考试
美国经典英文演讲100篇:"Truth and Tolerance in America"
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第二章:圣诞快乐 第3节
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第二章:圣诞快乐 第2节
【双语阅读】同一个国家 不同的信仰
奥巴马竞选获胜演讲文稿
小知识:“HHP”究竟是神马意思?
英文名著精选阅读:《小妇人》第一章:朝圣 第1节
克林顿在香港关于美国亚太地区政策的演讲口译10
克林顿在香港关于美国亚太地区政策的演讲口译3
第26届世界大学生夏季运动会组织委员会副主席王荣致辞
口译笔译综合:胡锦涛工商领导人峰会演讲
美国经典英文演讲100篇:"Religious Belief and Public Morality"
[双语]奥巴马祝贺诺贝尔和平奖获得者声明
2011诺贝尔奖得主托马斯•萨金特加州大学伯克利分校毕业演讲
美国经典英文演讲100篇:Farewell Address
胡锦涛深圳第26届大运会开幕式欢迎宴会致辞
八段经典演讲节选(中英文对照)
[双语]12岁小姑娘6分钟的联合国大会演讲
温总理剑桥大学演讲对译稿(上)
克林顿在香港关于美国亚太地区政策的演讲口译11
【留美日记】嘿你,感恩节了没?
美国经典英文演讲100篇:"Television News Coverage"
英文名著精选阅读:《傲慢与偏见》第11章 第2节
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |