Major companies are already in pursuit of commercial applications of the new biology. They dream of placing enzymes in the automobile to monitor exhaust and send data on pollution to a microprocessor that will then adjust the engine. They speak of what the New York Times calls metal-hungry microbes that might be used to mine valuable trace metal from ocean water. They have already demanded and won the right to patent new lifeforms.
Nervous critics, including many scientists, worry that there is corporate, national, international, and inter-scientific rivalry in the entire biotechnological field. They create images not of oil spills, but of microbe spills that could spread disease and destroy entire populations. The creation and accidental release of extremely poisonous microbes, however, is only one cause for alarm. Completely rational and respectable scientists are talking about possibilities that stagger the imagination.
Should we breed people with cow-with stomachs so they can digest grass and hay, thereby relieving the food problem by modifying us to eat lower down on the food chain? Should we biologically alter workers to fit the job requirement, for example, creating pilots with faster reaction times or assembly-line workers designed to do our monotonous work for us? Should we attempt to eliminate inferior people and breed a super-race? Should we produce soldiers to do our fighting? Should we use genetic forecasting to pre-eliminate unfit babies? Should we grow reserve organs for ourselves, each of us having, as it were, a savings bank full of spare kidney, livers, or hands?
Wild as these notions may sound, every one has its advocates in the scientific community as well as its striking commercial application. As two critics of genetic engineering, Jeremy Rifkin and Ted Howard, state in their book Who Should Play God? , Broad scale genetic engineering will probably be introduced to America much the same way as assembly lines automobiles, vaccines, computers and all the other technologies. As each new genetic advance becomes commercially practical, a new consumer need will be exploited and a market for the new technology will be created.
1. According to the passage, the exhaust from a car engine could probably be checked by
A) using metal-hungry microbes.
B) making use of enzymes.
C) adjusting the engine.
D) patenting new life forms.
2. According to the passage, which of the following would worry the critics the most?
A) The unanticipated explosion of population.
B) The creation of biological solar cells.
C) The accidental spill of oil.
D) The unexpected release of destructive microbes.
3. Which of the following notions is NOT mentioned?
A) Developing a savings bank of ones organs.
B) Breeding soldiers for a war.
C) Producing people with cow-like stomachs.
D) Using genetic forecasting to cure diseases.
4. According to the passage, Hitler attempted to
A) change the pilots biologically to win the war.
B) develop genetic farming for food supply.
C) kill the people he thought of as inferior.
D) encourage the development of genetic weapons for the war.
5. What does Jeremy Rifkin and Ted Howards statement imply?
A) the commercial applications of genetic engineering are inevitable.
B) America will depend on other countries for biological progress.
C) Americans are proud of their computers, automobiles and genetic technologies.
D) The potential application of each new genetic advance should be controlled.
KEYS: BDDCA
雅思阅读辅导8组常见的关系词拯救阅读困难户
雅思阅读考场技能训练方法略读细读交叉运用
教你为你的雅思口语加分添彩实用小招数
雅思听力备考秘籍:常用信号词分类整理
雅思口试中会遇到的问题及应对策略
雅思听力的五步备考策略摆脱听力难题不是梦
高效准备雅思考试技巧内功修行题海战术
雅思剑9即将发布听力完成句子拿分五大要领
雅思口语考试应该要把握的两大高分原则
黄金法则不同题型的雅思阅读题解答技巧
雅思阅读高分的三个策略
雅思阅读选择题如何应对干扰项
精准定位三类不同考生的雅思听力备考策略
世界杯32强口号巴西最霸气意大利很浪漫
雅思秘籍大公开多元化视角透析雅思阅读
雅思口语快速提升大法注意选材短文复述
雅思口语中的常用地点词汇和句型总结
雅思阅读词汇量之外的四大重要技能
2013年2月1617日雅思口语机经及备考指导
提高雅思成绩的10个建议
怎样解决雅思听力流动语感不敏感的问题
2月23日24日雅思口语机经汇总及备考指导
雅思常用精品短句
雅思大解密2014上半年雅思考情分析报告
雅思宝典:写作高分备考的七大关键点
高效经验分享通道雅思考试7分单项学习计划
合理安排雅思阅读做题顺序充分发挥英语水平
高效备考雅思阅读的经验分享
阅读做题技巧通过关键词判断作者意图
雅思口语较难话题应对技巧
不限 |
英语教案 |
英语课件 |
英语试题 |
不限 |
不限 |
上册 |
下册 |
不限 |