Conservationistsmay be miscalculating the numbers of the threatened animals such as elephants.say African and American researchers.The error occurs because of a flaw in the way they estimate animal numbers from the piles of dungthe creatures leave behind.
The mistake could 1ead researchers to think that there are twice as many elephants as there really are in some regions according to Andrew Plumptre of the Wildlife Conservation Society in New York
Biologist Katy Payne of Cornell University in Ithaca,New York,agrees.We really need to know elephant numbers and the evidence that we have is quite indirectsays Payne,who electronically tracks elephants
Counting elephants from planes is impossible in the vast rainforests of Central Africa.So researchers often estimate elephant numbers by counting dung piles in a given area.They also need to know the rate at which dung decays Because its extremely difficult to determine these rates.however,researchers counting elephants in one region tend to rely on standard decay rates established elsewhere
But researchers at the WCS have found that this decay rate varies from region to region depending on the climate and environment Using the wrong values can lead the census astray,says Plumptre
He and his colleague Anthony Chifu Nchanji studied decaying elephant dung in the forests of Cameroon They found that the dung decayed between 55 and 65 per cent more slowly than the dung in the rainforests of neighbouring Gabon.If researchers use decay rates from Gabon to count elephants in Cameroon,they would probably find more elephants than are actually around.This could mean estimates in Cameroon are at least twice as high as those derived from decay rates calculated locally,says PlumptreHowever accurate your dung density estimate might be.the decay rate can severely affect the result
Plumptre also says that the dungpile census should be carried out over a region similar in size to an elephants natural range The usual technique of monitoring only small,protected areas distorts numbers because elephants move in and out of these regions,he saysIf the elephant population increases within the protected area,you can not determine whether 1t is a real increase or whether it is due to elephants moving in because they are being poachedoutside.
Plumptre says that similar problems may also affect other animal census studies that rely on indirect evidence such as nests,tracks or burrows
1The wordthreatenedin the first sentence of the first paragraph could be best replaced by
A endangered
B frightened
C killed
D angered
2 Why do researchers estimate elephant numbers in an area by counting dung piles?
A Because elephants are difficult to catch
B Because it is not possible to count elephants from a plane.
C Because it is not possible to keep track of elephants.
D Because elephants are shy animals
3 Piles of dung cant be relied upon when it comes to estimating elephant numbers because
A they are different in size
B they scatter an over the region.
C they are different in decay rate.
D they are different in quality.
4 According to Plumptre,the region over which a dungpile census is carried out should be
A small enough
B well protected.
C carefully monitored.
D large enough
5The first wordHein paragraph 6 refers to
A Andrew Plumptre
B Katy Payne.
C Anthony Chifu Nchanji.
D the writer of the article.
参考答案
1 A 2 B 3 c 4 D 5 A
1月22日雅思写作预测20题及语料库
2015年1月19日雅思口语预测完整版
2015年1月18日雅思考试预测(汇总)
2015年2月13日雅思口语预测完整版
2月8日雅思写作机经预测
1月25日雅思阅读预测
2015年2月8日雅思口语预测小范围版
2015年2月6日雅思写作预测20题及语料库
2月6日雅思口语Part1精准预测15题及语料库
2月1日及8日雅思口语Part Two预测25题及思路拓展
2015年2月份雅思口语全方位预测
1月22日雅思口语预测小范围版
2月13日雅思口语预测小范围版
2015年2月雅思阅读预测
2月13日雅思口语Parttwo预测25题及语料库
1月22日雅思口语预测完整版
2月20日雅思写作预测小作文10题及语料库
雅思考试写作最新预测发布(权威)
2月16日雅思考试预测(汇总)
2月25雅思口语预测及新题汇总Part1&2
2月20日雅思考试预测
雅思考试口语考题权威预测的发布
雅思考试考试口语考前预测出炉
2015年2月13日雅思考试预测(汇总)
2月6日及7日雅思口语完整版
2015年2月8日雅思考试预测(汇总)
2月雅思G类写作预测终极25题
2月8日雅思听力机经预测
雅思口语Part2精准预测25题及语料库
2月10日雅思写作小作文预测(10题)
| 不限 |
| 英语教案 |
| 英语课件 |
| 英语试题 |
| 不限 |
| 不限 |
| 上册 |
| 下册 |
| 不限 |