Task 2 Question: Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists includes painters, musicians, poets, however, other people think that is a waste of money for providing this assistance. Discuss it from the perspective of Chinese student.
To be of assistance or not, it indeed is debatable if artists deserve and require funding by the government. Firstly, I acknowledge that the benefits from artists and poets can enrich our everyday lives in so many different ways; otherwise our life would have been a lot drabber without them.
Any genuine artist most certainly deserves some form of aid and there can not be any doubt about that, however, whether they require government assistance is another issue altogether. Contrary to popular belief it seems to be that not all artists and literary personalities are wealthy, and most renowned personalities are deservedly rich and famous.
While the other large group of artists is neither rich nor famous, they do continue to produce the art works as for the passion and often the passion is what drives them. It would be ridiculous to think that any kind of financial incentives could power their creativity. However, not many of them are able to take up their passion on a full time basis because they cannot afford to. It is import to note that most creative artists are made, and were not born so. It is the vagaries of life struggles that they have to face which fuels their creativity, in the process they need to mature into renowned to be an artist or a writer. When they do and when their work is recognized, there will not be any dearth of money or fame.
In my opinion, it would be criminal to take away this very drive and shun their creativity. Having said that, I do believe that they need to have some kind of incentives, it can be in the way of appreciation and opportunity to present their talent to the rest of the world. This could be done in various ways, for instance, giving tax incentives to amateur artists and writers or financial rebates in government owned auditoriums to stage their presentations.
In talking about artists in Australia, which has a concrete social security system in place to take care of all kinds of basic needs, any kind of added financial incentives are not only an added burden on the taxpayer. It would be an issue to find out worthy beneficiaries and there will be enough crooks who will misuse any well intended government assistance schemes. Every human being craves for recognition and money happens to be one of the means towards this end, however, as I mentioned in the beginning it is more important to acknowledge their work than provide financial assistance.
On the other hand, as a Chinese, my perception of the governments assistance is more questionable. Firstly, we need to give artists a definition and how do you classify a person who is an artist. In essence, calligraphy, poetry, music and art they all can be extended to a person who writes well, paints well in his/her Blog. To extend this artist sense further, can we say a singer is an artist? Well, there are many pop song and folk music singers in China. In the same way, a dancer, a talk shows talent, a movie star, the director, the photographer they can all be artists. And this number of artists would add up to whole population of Australia. How could the Chinese government provide any assistance without any discrimination to those artists in every classification? I personally do not believe our government has enough financial ability to accommodate this wide ganging number of artists.
As a Chinese I can see that in my country, there is still a big gap between the poor and the rich, I would rather governments financial assistance be directed toward the poor, this does not mean that I would think to provide assistance to artists is a waste of money. My point is that while we can give a true definition of artists, government should use our taxes in a way to be more accountable for.
Chinese culture has more than a five-thousand-year history, have we not seen many arts produced by the poor and without any government assistance. My conclusion as a Chinese, I would prefer that government provides financial assistance to the poor first, and then gives incentives to all kinds of artists.
上一篇: 雅思大作文的常用写作结构
下一篇: 雅思写作句型变化很重要 但不一定要倒装
2017届高考英语一轮复习限时训练:1-2 English around the world(新人教版)
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题09 连词和状语从句(解析版)
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题11 特殊句式(原卷版)
体坛英语资讯:Warriors, Timberwolves to play two preseason games in China
甘肃省天水市、兰州市2017届高三下学期一模考试英语试卷
追求性别平等 澳大利亚引入女版红绿灯
BBC:非英语公司规定说英语,越来越普遍
外媒看中国:中国整容院承诺给你整成伊万卡
Rescued chimp, Professor's viral fame 黑猩猩幼崽重获新生、意外成名的教授家庭
Making money from your spare room 空房间变生财之道
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题12 交际用语(原卷版)
报告显示 中国内地和香港超级富豪人数均激增
美参议院将为确认最高法院大法官人选听证
体坛英语资讯:Roger Federer defeats Stan Wawrinka for historic Indian Wells title
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题13 人物传记、故事类(原卷版)
The whole of July
如何为求职面试做准备?
妈妈的双手 My Mother’s Hands
对鼻子形状不满意?这要怪气候咯
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题14 资讯报道、广告类(原卷版)
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题10 名词性从句(原卷版)
福建省厦门市2017届高三3月质量检测英语试卷
综合国力最强国家TOP10!你猜中国排第几?
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题16 科普类说明文(原卷版)
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题15 社会生活、说理议论类(原卷版)
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题12 交际用语(解析版)
中国一小学组织活动抗议韩国部署萨德
体坛英语资讯:Xinjiang into CBA finals following 111-103 victory over Liaoning in semis Game 5
2017届高考英语一轮复习限时训练:1-1 Friendship(新人教版)
近三年高考(2017-2016)英语试题分项版解析:专题07 非谓语动词(原卷版)