Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
上一篇: 模板式作文在雅思写作中难得高分
下一篇: 雅思写作提纲18篇(汇总)
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题2 阅读理解8
2017最精彩的8部历史片
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题2 阅读理解9
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达13
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达8
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题2 阅读理解10
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达11
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题2 阅读理解15
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题1 单项选择13
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达4
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达12
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达2
2016届高考英语第一轮课时检测试卷28
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题1 单项选择6
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题1 单项选择19
2016届高考英语第一轮课时检测试卷16
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达5
国内英语资讯:B&R initiative new opening-up strategy: scholar
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题2 阅读理解1
2016高考英语二轮复习专题限时训练(江苏专用)专题5 书面表达9