Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful . However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions .
上一篇: 备考雅思有助于提高英文写作能力
下一篇: 雅思写作8分范文:图表作文范文(2)
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M5 Unit 1《Getting along with others》
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修6 Unit3《A healthy life》(新人教版福建专用)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修7 Unit1《Living well》(新人教版福建专用)
体坛英语资讯:Bayern, Monchengladbach progress into German Cup quarterfinals
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:M8 Unit2《Cloning》(新人教版广东专用)
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M10 Unit 2《People on the move》
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修8 Unit5《Meeting your ancestors》(新人教版福建专用)
微信“绿包”功能,当心抢红包变成发红包
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:M5 Unit4《Making the news》(新人教版广东专用)
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M3 Unit 3《Back to the past》、
体坛英语资讯:Alaves, Celta to vie for kings Cup final berth
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M2 Unit 2《Wish you were here》
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修6 Module 3《Interpersonal Relationships—Friendship》(外研版全国通用)
国际英语资讯:Israels legalization of settlement in West Bank outrages Palestinians
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M1 Unit 3《Looking good,feeling good》
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M10 Unit 1《Building the future》
国际英语资讯:Britain to trade under WTO rules if Europe rejects Brexit deal, MPs told
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M4 Unit 3《Tomorrow’s World》
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M2 Unit 1《Tales of the unexplained》
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M1 Unit 1《School life》
川普重申美国对北约的支持
体坛英语资讯:LaLiga President defends decision to suspend Celta-Madrid game
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修6 Module 4《Music》(外研版全国通用)
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M2 Unit 3《Amazing people》
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M4 Unit 2《Sporting events》
2017届高考英语1轮复习牛津译林江苏专版课件:M1 Unit 2《Growing pains》
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修8 Unit3《Inventors and inventions》(新人教版福建专用)
美司法部提上诉要求恢复川普旅行限令
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修7 Unit3《Under the sea》(新人教版福建专用)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:选修7 Module 5《Ethnic Culture》(外研版全国通用)