Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions.
上一篇: 雅思写作高分范文:technology
下一篇: 十个雅思写作高分模板句
体坛英语资讯:Ducks triumph in Beijing derby in CBA
2019年豆瓣评分最高的十部BBC推荐电影
体坛英语资讯:Slovakia beat Azerbaijan 2-0 in Euro 2020 qualifiers
国际英语资讯:Israels Likud ruling party prepares for leadership primary
国内英语资讯:Discover China: Green shoots of prosperity as asparagus takes root in rural China
科学研究:抹茶粉能减肥?假的
吃奶酪会上瘾?
体坛英语资讯:Serbian Partizan beat Lithuanian Rytas to advance to basketball Eurocup top 16
体坛英语资讯:South Africa beat Ghana on penalties to qualify for Tokyo Olympics mens soccer
体坛英语资讯:Poland beat Slovenia in Lukasz Piszczeks farewell
更环保的墨水诞生了!不用石油,用海藻
体坛英语资讯:Beijing Renhe demoted from Chinese Super League after home defeat to Jiangsu Suning
幸福是一种香水
国内英语资讯:Guangzhou Baiyun Airport to handle 90 million passengers in 2025
国内英语资讯:South China building new test zone for self-driving cars
国内英语资讯:Xi Focus: Xi stresses preparations for Winter Olympics as new high-speed railway opens
给孩子零花钱开始变得"移动化"
国内英语资讯:Across China: Yiwu: Santas new hometown
美国发布最新电子烟报告,引起严重肺病的物质基本确定
盘点:2019年最热门的12首流行歌曲
元旦节的习俗介绍英文版
国际英语资讯:Egypt, France agree to intensify cooperation for political solution to Libyan crisis
2020"美国小姐"花落24岁女博士
School Violence 校园暴力
体坛英语资讯:Mourinho appointed as new manager of Tottenham Hotspur
国际英语资讯:U.S. Fed policy-making committee could see more consensus on monetary policy in 2020: media
新研究:每天觉得累?可能是严重的健康问题
国际英语资讯:Putin advocates normalizing ties in message to Trump
体坛英语资讯:Interview: Sir Mark Todd still has Tokyo Olympics in mind
国内英语资讯:Yearender: 2019 marks fruitful year of China-Cambodia cooperation in culture, tourism