Anyone can post information on the Internet. Some people say most of what we read on the Internet is inaccurate. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It seems quite interesting that the Internet is ubiquitous among the general publics daily work and life, symbolizing the advent of the Internet era. The internet empowers us to seek the very information we need. However, due to the fact that posting news and information is totally available to everyone, some claim that the message we acquire may prove less precise. This essay is to discuss this topic in a more balanced way with exemplifications.
The most pressing problem is that some individuals take advantage of the Internet to commit fraud. An abundance of information on the Internet, amazingly, is not severely regulated. It is apparent that anyone with a certain amount of money and minimal skills with computer based knowledge is capable of posting an article immediately. One impressive case in point is that one famous milk company hired a group of staff to make up false comments on his rivals commodities such as the inferior quality of products and the poor customer service via the Internet, but intensify great efforts to promote the quality of their products in the name of the real customers. As a consequence, a countless number of clients are cheated and fall victims to these false customers feedback.
However, the advocating voice can also be heard about such a free posting mode. Although Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, for instance, it has a large group of active and professional editors who remove erroneous information. It is true that Wikipedia serve vast quantities of information concerning almost all fields, rendering prompt helps to the reaserchers.
Undoubtedly, some postings on the Internet are of immense importance to us, especially ones about the advice for the computers. We tend to be encountered with quite a few intractable problems such as how to update and edit some documentaries or files, and the postings related to these headaches will be the very suggestion we can turn to.
In summary, to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the information on the Internet, the government may attempt to establish increasingly stringent censorship like demanding the supply of the posters real and overall personal information, which is a fairly practical way.
上一篇: 雅思G类小作文范文之咨询信
下一篇: 如何在30分钟内又快又好拿下雅思写作
国内英语资讯:Commentary: New China turns 70, witnessing a golden age
英语六级作文答案:试卷三 职责与兴趣
Living In the Small Cities 生活在小城市
习近平在庆祝中华人民共和国成立70周年大会上的讲话要点
Chinese Features Are Everywhere 中国特色无处不在
如何用英语介绍昨晚天安门广场的联欢活动?
体坛英语资讯:Carvajal says time is needed for a revolution at Real Madrid
国内英语资讯:Xi stresses unity, striving for national rejuvenation at PRC anniversary reception
Chinese Tourists Are Around the World 中国游客满世界
国际英语资讯:Russia to target any U.S. missiles deployed in Europe after nuclear treaty terminated: Kreml
体坛英语资讯:Chinese sports official ambiguous about hosting 2030 World Cup
我国计划到2035年新增216个机场
国际英语资讯:Brazils Lula refuses to move to semi-open prison
娱乐英语资讯:Renowned U.S. orchestra to celebrate Chinese musical culture with special concert
Study Environment 学习环境
体坛英语资讯:Palmeiras dump head coach Scolari
国内英语资讯:China Focus: Xi says no force can ever undermine Chinas status
国际英语资讯:Putin says ready for direct dialogue with Trump
国际英语资讯:Spotlight: U.S. Defense Secretary Mattis to quit at end of February
国内英语资讯:Xi, Putin exchange congratulations on 70th anniversary of diplomatic ties
The Policy of Road and Belt 一带一路政策
国际英语资讯:EU should open accession talks with North Macedonia: Montenegrin president
体坛英语资讯:Maradona close to taking charge of Gimnasia, says president
体坛英语资讯:E-sports Shanghai Masters to be held in November
国际英语资讯:Libyan govt warns of continued IS threat to national security
体坛英语资讯:USA still unbeaten in FIBA World Cup after routing Japan 98-45
报告显示 中国劳动者超时工作率高达42.2%
体坛英语资讯:Germany beat U.S. 4-0 to make FIFA U-17 Womens World Cup quarterfinal
国际英语资讯:U.S. to force asylum seekers to stay in Mexico
国际英语资讯:Spotlight: U.S. western city embraces immigrants as officials bash White House rhetoric