A photograph that shows some railway staffers helping passengers get into a train through the windows cost two station managers their jobs.
Last Thursday, some 1,500 passengers waited at Dongguan railway station in Guangdong province to board a train, which was scheduled to stop there for only 4 minutes. When some of them tried to get into the carriages through the windows, some staffers gave them a helping hand.
After seeing the photographs on Internet websites, the Guangdong Railway Group sacked the station's director and Party chief for "poor management of the station". The decision triggered a debate both on the Net and in the traditional media.
While 90 percent of the respondents in online surveys have sympathized with the sacked officials, the commentaries focus on whether they deserved the punishment. Most of the commentators agree with the Guangdong Railway Group that the "chaotic state at the station" suggests the station managers had been negligent and were incapable of handling situations, though they acknowledge the "kindness" of the railway staff.
In my opinion, the fact that so many people have sympathized with the sacked officials - when usually the public exults at news of officials being punished - deserves more attention than whether the managers deserved the punishment.
In the Dongguan incident, railway employees showed concern for the passengers, most of who were migrant workers. It is inconsistent with the stereotyped image of employees of government organizations or certain State-owned enterprises that enjoy monopoly. In people's impressions, such employees are usually arrogant and indifferent.
Many passengers have unpleasant experiences of traveling in public transport. They have memories of being directed here and there by staffers or confronting a cold face when seeking information. Others remember being scolded for some unintentional offense.
Admittedly, railway employees' attitude has improved significantly in recent years. It is not uncommon to see carriage conductors helping the weak and senior citizens to their seats.
But I suspect they do so more out of concern for the "performance assessment" in the annual selection of "advanced train" and less because they sincerely want to help passengers. But there indeed are some staffers who are sincere and kind-hearted, and they do help passengers.
What makes me suspicious is the difference in attitude I have seen when there is no such assessment or selection in progress. You just have to walk to a ticket counter or a station entrance and see the cold, rigid faces of employees and hear their answers to find out whether my judgment is right or groundless.
But the Dongguan railway station case is different. The staffers were definitely not acting to get favorable assessment when they helped the passengers get into the train through the windows. On the contrary, they were running the risk of getting a demerit point, because they were violating the rules. Anyone who has seen the photographs will agree that those staffers were sincere.
Boarding a train through a window is what a passenger should never have to do but sometimes has to in our country, because the railways' capacity to carry passengers is far short of the demand, especially during festivals.
I have had the experience of squeezing my way into a train, including using the window as a door.
Nearly all the common people have had the same experience. We all understand how one feels in such a situation when a government staff, who otherwise should have stopped you, gives a helping hand.
The Dongguan railway station staff have shown the best part of human nature. That is why they have moved so many readers, viewers and commentators. The station managers may need to be punished but the staffers merit commendation.
I hope to see more such heart-warming scenes in government organizations, public service venues and public transport facilities.
上一篇: Let the chips fall
下一篇: Divine ambrosia
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book2 module1 Our Body and Healthy Habits(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book4 module3 Body Language and Nonverbal Communication(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book3 module5 Great People and Great Inventions of Ancient China(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专题提分考点课件:10.2.2 从属连词
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专题提分考点课件:10.1 并列连词
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book2 module4 Fine Arts—Western, Chinese and Pop Arts(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专题提分考点课件:5 非谓语动词
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专题提分考点课件:9 介词
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book1 module3 My First Ride on a Train(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book6 module3 Interpersonal Relationship—Friendship(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book6 module6 War and Peace(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book5 module6 Animals in Danger(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book5 module2 A Job Worth Doing(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book5 module3 Adventure in Literature and the Cinema(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book6 module2 Fantasy Literature(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专题提分考点课件:8 代词
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专题提分考点课件:7 冠词
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book1 module6 The Internet and Telecommunications(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book1 module1 My First Day at Senior High(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book8 module1-3(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book1 module5 A Lesson in a Lab(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习语法专题提分考点课件:10.2.1 从属连词
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book3 module3 The Violence of Nature(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book3 module2 Developing and Developed Countries(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book6 module1 Small Talk(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习词法课件:名词(全国通用)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book4 module1 Life in the Future(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book3 module4 Sandstorms in Asia(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习课件:book3 module6 Old and New(外研版)
2017届高考英语一轮复习词法课件:构词法(全国通用)