There is a group of people in this country who regard themselves as the "elites of society". They take themselves to be the most advanced part of society in China's progress toward modernity. They always try to distinguish themselves from the public by saying something special. Their most favorite tactic is to publish an opinion that challenges the masses' common sense. They are best at exaggerating a situation to produce a sensational effect.
A recent event gave them such a chance.
Fan Meizhong, a middle school teacher in Sichuan, ran away from a soon-to-collapse classroom when the earthquake struck, leaving his students behind. His act provoked widespread criticism on the Internet and in the media. Most critics remarked that he had violated the professional ethics of a teacher though his involuntary dodging of danger was understandable as a human being.
Meanwhile, quite a number of people expressed their sympathy for Fan. They placed more emphasis on the need to forgive the weaker side of human nature. They surely have reasons to hold this opinion. And it is reassuring to hear a different voice in the unanimous criticism against Fan, for it represents an effort to create a democratic atmosphere in the circle of critics.
Some people, however, went too far in defying the public sentiment. They challenged the mainstream opinion by accusing it of "moral autocracy". One of them published a commentary titled "Can we become more noble by defaming Fan"?
The commentator, who gave his surname as Cao, said the critical remarks on the Internet forums "generally demonstrated an excessively excited sentiment of moral trial". He debunked the online criticism as a "moral campaign the pseudo moralists and young radicals have waged in order to erect a chastity arch (to honor themselves)".
These words show that Cao was targeting at the whole community of Fan's critics.
He based his argument on the assumption that everybody has the same "weakness" in his/her innermost soul as Fan displayed. Therefore, he said, people should not blame Fan but should instead regard him as an excusable pal and "reflect on the human weakness together with Fan". He urged Fan's critics to "approach him rather than abandon him; understand him rather than wantonly vilify him".
Cao was wrong in his argument at least on three points. First, not everybody will behave the same way Fan did, as suggested by Cao. This has been proved by thousands of people who bravely saved others in the quake risking their own lives.
Second, the fact that most people have the same human weakness does not mean that they are not eligible to criticize Fan. People condemned him out of their understanding of what is morally right and wrong. Do they need to do something heroic before they start criticizing Fan?
Third, Fan's critics did not blame him for being afraid of death but for ignoring his students' safety and claiming that he would even abandon his mother in the same situation.
An ugly behavior was made known to the public and the public expressed their disapproval, or even anger, at the behavior. This is only too natural. What traces of "autocracy" can one find in the critical remarks? It is true that some of the critics used harsh words in denouncing Fan. But such unwanted expressions are understandable, given Fan's shameless showing off of his behavior. They are far from "brandishing a moral club" to "kill" Fan, as Cao alleged them to be in his commentary.
Like other "social elites", Cao "imagines himself as a safeguard of justice" - to quote Cao's own words in his criticism of Fan's critics - and tries to teach the public a lesson about democracy and human rights. Regrettably, the public do not want to hear their garrulous preaching; they have seen through the hypocrites.
上一篇: Doesn't cut it?
下一篇: Zero tolerance
国际英语资讯:Sudans military council urges opposition to facilitate power transition
国际英语资讯:Trump cuts off infrastructure talks with Democrats, demands end to investigations
国际英语资讯:Modi-led BJP wins Indian elections: Election Commission
国际英语资讯:Mongolian president urges parliament to dissolve itself
体坛英语资讯:Kakko secures another win for Finland in ice hockey worlds
国际英语资讯:State aid for film production in Romania a success: PM
体坛英语资讯:Djokovic wins Madrid Open without dropping a set
体坛英语资讯:Matchday 37 in Spain leaves lots to be decided in final round
研究表明:听悲伤的歌会让抑郁患者快乐
国内英语资讯:China plans to remove all expressway toll booths by end of 2019
国内英语资讯:Political advisors propose better protecting Grand Canal
你的人生中最后悔的事是什么?
国内英语资讯:Chinese, Kyrgyz officials vow to enhance bilateral cooperation
国内英语资讯:China Focus: China honors amputee demining soldier
国际英语资讯:Turkey holds joint military drill with 7 countries
体坛英语资讯:Rondon, Rincon lead Venezuela Copa America squad
日本外相喊话外媒:安倍晋三的正确写法应该是Abe Shinzo
体坛英语资讯:Latvia turns tables against Austria in ice hockey worlds
国内英语资讯:Senior CPC official calls for advances in philosophy, social sciences
国内英语资讯:China to set demonstration areas on rule-of-law for govts
体坛英语资讯:Manchester City claim Premier League title with 4-1 win in Brighton
国内英语资讯:Xinhua Headlines: U.S. tariff addiction -- a cause of concern to global economy
2019年6月大学英语四级作文范文:英语拼写
体坛英语资讯:Labordes goal gives Montpellier hope of finishing top four with Saint-Etienne win
国际英语资讯:News Analysis: Italy opens competition probe into Google in face off with Italian utility En
体坛英语资讯:Nantes extend defender Pallois contract until 2022
体坛英语资讯:Ma Long, Boll to play 2019 table tennis China Open
国内英语资讯:China, Kenya relations have developed with deep roots: Chinese envoy
国内英语资讯:Chinese envoy asks for adherence to political solution in Libya
体坛英语资讯:Germany edge Denmark at ice hockey worlds