A deal in Durban
Dec 11th 2011, 18:08 by J.A. | DURBAN
IN THE early hours of December 11th, after three days and nights of exhausting, often ill-tempered, final negotiations, the UNs two-week-long climate-change summit ended in Durban with an agreement.
Its terms-assuming they are acted upon-are unlikely to be sufficient to prevent a global temperature rise of more than 2C. They might easily allow a 4C rise. Yet with many governments distracted by pressing economic worries, the deal was as much as could have been expected from Durban; perhaps a little more.
The core of it is, in effect, a quid-pro-quo arrangement between the European Union and big developing-country polluters, including China and India. For its part, the EU will undertake a second round of emissions abatement under the Kyoto protocol, after its main provisions expire at the end of 2012. That will prolong the shelf-life of a treaty that imposes no emissions-cutting burden on any developing country.
In return, all countries have agreed to negotiate a new mitigation regime by 2015 and make it operational by 2020. Crucially, this new regime will see the burden of emission-cutting shared among all countries, even if rich ones will still be expected to do much more than poorer countries.
This commitment, which was reached despite last-ditch resistance from China and India, and despite little enthusiasm for it from America, looks like the Durban summits biggest achievement. It promises to break a divisive and anachronistic distinction between developed and developing countries, which has thoroughly poisoned the waters of the UN process. It has also rendered it ineffective, given that the so-called developing countries given a free pass under Kyoto, including South Korea and Saudi Arabia as well as China and India, are now responsible for 58% of global emissions.
That is why the biggest developing-country polluters, chiefly China and India, were so reluctant to relinquish their freedom to pollute. With most other elements of a deal in place, almost 36 hours after the climate summit was due to have ended, the Indians were the last major obstacle to it. Their particular objection was to the insistence of the EU and its allies that the successor to Kyoto must be legally binding on all countries. Am I to write a blank cheque and sign away the livelihoods and sustainability of 1.2 billion Indians, without even knowing what [the new agreement] contains? asked the Indian environment minister, Jayanti Natarajan. I wonder if this is an agenda to shift the blame on to countries who are not responsible [for climate change].
With the prospect of no deal looming, the Europeans and Indian delegations were urged to go into a huddle in the middle of the conference hall and work out a compromise. They did so and, as per a Brazilian suggestion, agreed that the putative new deal would be a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force.
上一篇: 考研英语阅读答题技巧
下一篇: 2015考研英语阅读管理合伙人制
年末盘点:2017年的那些文化禁令[1]
2017十大最佳“照片炸弹”(组图)[1]
爱出轨或是基因惹的祸
国内英语资讯:Chinese FM talks over phone with Dominican Republic counterpart
强大DNA检测 帮你了解自己的身体
我的星期天(My Sunday)
国际英语资讯:Fauci says coronavirus outbreak in U.S. not yet under total control
如何学习英语
英三大政党领导人圣诞卡片出炉 各具特色[1]
国际英语资讯:Global COVID-19 deaths surpass 290,000 -- Johns Hopkins University
圣诞装饰有新招 男士胡须成亮点
李克强在中国-中东欧国家经贸论坛上的致辞[1]
一个动作预测你的死亡时间
最高龄邦女郎莫妮卡·贝鲁奇从未公开的旧照[1]
英国网店推出万圣节“性感埃博拉护士服”引热议
奥巴马:千禧一代促进美国经济转型
给孩子取名犯难?从《唐顿庄园》里选一个吧!
《时代周刊》:2017十大最佳电影[1]
国内英语资讯:China to continue helping Spain fight COVID-19 epidemic: FM
国内英语资讯:Chinese defense minister holds phone talk with Indonesian counterpart