The falling dollar
THE dollar s tumble this week was attended by predictable shrieks from the markets; but as it fell to a 20 month low of $1.32 against the euro, the only real surprise was that it had not slipped sooner. Indeed, there are good reasons to expect its slide to continue, dragging it below the record low of $1.36 against the euro that it hit in December 2004.
The recent decline was triggered by nasty news about the American economy. New figures this week suggested that the housing market s troubles are having a wider impact on the economy. Consumer confidence and durable goods orders both fell more sharply than expected. In contrast, German business confidence has risen to a 15 year high. There are also mounting concerns that central banks in China and elsewhere, which have been piling up dollars assiduously for years, may start selling.
Yet cyclical factors only partly explain why the dollar has been strong. At bottom, its attractiveness is based more on structural factors-or, more accurately, on an illusion about structural differences between the American and European economies.
The main reason for the dollar s strength has been the widespread belief that the American economy vastly outperformed the world s other rich country economies in recent years. But the figures do not support the hype. Sure, America s GDP growth has been faster than Europe s, but that is mostly because its population has grown more quickly too. Dig deeper and the difference shrinks. Official figures of productivity growth, which should in theory be an important factor driving currency movements, exaggerate America s lead. If the two are measured on a comparable basis, productivity growth over the past decade has been almost the same in the euro area as it has in America. Even more important, the latest figures suggest that, whereas productivity growth is now slowing in America, it is accelerating in the euro zone.
So, contrary to popular perceptions, America s economy has not significantly outperformed Europe s in recent years. And to achieve this not much better than parity, America has had to pump itself full of steroids. Since 2000 its structural budget deficit has widened sharply, while American households saving rate has plunged, causing the current account deficit to swell. Over the same period, the euro area economies saw no fiscal stimulus and household saving barely budged.
America s growth, thus, has been driven by consumer spending. That spending, supported by dwindling saving and increased borrowing, is clearly unsustainable; and the consequent economic and financial imbalances must inevitably unwind. As that happens, the country could face a prolonged period of slower growth.
As for Europe, the old continent is hobbled by inflexible product and labour markets. But that, paradoxically, is an advantage: it means the place has a lot of scope for improvement. Some European countries are beginning to contemplate economic reforms. If they push ahead, their growth could actually speed up over the coming years. Once investors spot this, they are likely to conclude that the euro is a better bet than the dollar.
上一篇: 考研英语阅读真题文章三十篇之十二
山东省济宁市鱼台县实验中学2018届九年级上学期期中考试英语试题
浙江绍兴建功教育集团2018年九期中测试卷英语答案
山东省济南市槐荫区2018届九年级上学期期中考试英语试题()
山东省五莲县2018届九年级上学期期中考试英语试题答案
浙江2018届外研版九年级英语上学期期中教学质量检测卷答案
2018年陕西省西安市未央区西航二中第一学期期中考试九年级英语答案
河南信阳风景区中学2018九上期中英语试题答案()
2018年牛津译林版9A英语期中试卷专题练习—时态填空答案
2019山东济南天桥十三中九年级上英语期中试题
2018学年度第一学期山东省德州市乐陵大孙中学九年级英语期中测试题 答案()