To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, all that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing. One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.
For example, a grandmotherly woman staffing an animal rights booth at a recent street fair was distributing a brochure that encouraged readers not to use anything that comes from or is tested in animalsno meat, no fur, no medicines. Asked if she opposed immunizations, she wanted to know if vaccines come from animal research. When assured that they do, she replied, Then I would have to say yes. Asked what will happen when epidemics return, she said, Dont worry, scientists will find some way of using computers. Such well-meaning people just dont understand.
Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way -- in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmothers hip replacement, a fathers bypass operation, a babys vaccinations, and even a pets shots. To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
Much can be done. Scientists could adopt middle school classes and present their own research. They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. If good people do nothing there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.
上一篇: 值得背诵的考研阅读真题十八
下一篇: 得背诵的考研阅读真题八
体坛英语资讯:Saudi national football team visits West Bank for 1st time
欧盟“惩罚性关税”
什么是“汇率中间价”?
国际英语资讯:Egypt to host new round of talks on Nile dam issue
国际英语资讯:Feature: Former U.S. Vice President Biden takes aim at gun violence at LA campaign rally
国际英语资讯:UN chiefs envoy holds talks with Cypriot community leaders ahead of crucial meeting
中国未出现大面积“房地产泡沫”
体坛英语资讯:Kenyas Kosgei breaks world record at 2019 Chicago Marathon
体坛英语资讯:Hungary defeats Azerbaijan 1-0, keeping hopes alive for Euro 2020
“骑警”及各类警种的英文表达
了解“双侧乳腺切除术”
国际英语资讯:News Analysis: Italy to move ahead with 2020 web tax despite intl pressures
中印“边界对峙”
电子烟为什么引发肺部疾病?美国锁定了里面一种物质
盘点动物们的九大有趣行为
用好“批评和自我批评”的武器
“以房养老”受争议
国际英语资讯:5 killed, including 3 children, in Southern California shooting
台湾对菲八项“制裁”
体坛英语资讯:Kipchoge nominated for IAAF Male Athlete of the Year