GMAT思为大家整理了GMAT写作5.5分:ARGUMENT写作模板,供考生们参考,以下是详细内容。
总模板:
In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.
In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that . However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the result that .. It is likely that , ..; it is also likely that Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that Therefore, this argument in question nee not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility.
In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesnot necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.
In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establisha general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.
In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. No evidence is provided to support this assumption. However there are all kinds of important differences between . and other making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, A..., however, B....Thus lacking this assumption, the conclusion that is entirely unfounded.
Last but no least, the validity of the survey on which the argument relies is doubtful in itself. The survey cited by the author is too vague to be informative.
The claim does not indicate who conducted this survey and when and how the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results of this survey are worthless as evidence to support that.
Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results.
普通的结尾
In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that . Because the evidence cited in the analysis is too weak to lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.
建议文章的结尾:
In conclusion, it is imprudent for to solely on the basis of the evidence presented. Because the evidence cited in the analysis is too weak to lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer should provide more substantial evidence concerning thatMoreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the recommendation untilthe arguer could provide all concrete evidence to rule out all the above possibilities that I analyzed.
调研文章的结尾:
In conclusion, the survey on which the argument relies lacks credibility and therefore does not lend strong support to the conclusion thatTo strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the recommendation until the arguer could provide all concrete evidence to rule out all the above possibilities that I analyzed.
以上就是GMAT写作5.5分:ARGUMENT写作模板的详细内容,考生可针对文中介绍的方法进行有针对性的备考。最后,GMAT预祝大家在GMAT考试中取得好成绩!
上一篇: GMAT满分作文独家炼制秘方分享
下一篇: GMAT写作如何应用公理
求职面试中怎样谈自己的缺点?
国内英语资讯:China ready to help Britain in COVID-19 fight: Chinese FM
米歇尔50岁生日:美媒解开米歇尔5大神话
体坛英语资讯:History beckons for Kipchoge on Tokyo Olympic marathon mission
NSA每天搜集2亿条短信
国际英语资讯:Brazilian Congress approves state of emergency to contain spread of COVID-19
疫情全球爆发,有航空公司裁员90%
J·K·罗琳犯罪小说《布谷鸟在呼唤》销量大增
经济自由度:美国排名日益萎缩
国际英语资讯:Trump says currently not considering nationwide lockdown
国际英语资讯:Zimbabwes Mnangagwa thanks China for support in fight against COVID-19
国内英语资讯:Xi, Putin discuss strengthening cooperation on fighting COVID-19 by phone
国际英语资讯:Pakistani PM calls for social distancing amid coronavirus spread
关于日本人口危机你不得不知道的几件事
奥朗德绯闻女友起诉八卦杂志 “第一女友”发声否认被抛弃
We Are Families 民族团结一家亲
Airbnb积极应对疫情,现在可以免费取消订单
体坛英语资讯:Bremen upset Dortmund, Schalke edge Hertha in German Cup
国际英语资讯:Irans president calls for removal of U.S. sanctions amid COVID-19 outbreak
体坛英语资讯:Bayern carve out 4-3 win over Hoffenheim to book German Cup quarterfinals
英国抗疫最新进展:不搞群体免疫了
谁才是最佳雇主?
体坛英语资讯:PSG beat Nantes 2-1 to go 15 points clear on table
体坛英语资讯:Leverkusen beat Stuttgart 2-1 to reach German Cup quarterfinals
国际英语资讯:Nepal announces ban on incoming international flights
国内英语资讯:China calls for targeted measures to curb cross-border COVID-19 transmission
国内英语资讯:France to learn from Chinas experience in fight against coronavirus: FM
当心“愤怒的小鸟”:英美利用手机程序搜集情报
马云开推特,宣布向美国、非洲捐物资,外国网友齐刷刷:Thank you!
国内英语资讯:Chinas Hubei sends over 1,600 migrant workers to Guangdong